Category: Culture

Some observations,

1.) Palin has the pentecostal lingo down.

2.) Reformed people had better ask themselves hard questions about whether or not they want to yoke themselves with Palin’s version of Christianity.

3.)Pentecostalism has a long history of women leaders in its Churches. It is not surprising that Palin would have the convictions that she has about female leadership growing up in pentecostalism.

4.) Since it is a Pentecostal age it shouldn’t be surprising that the representative of Evangelicals in politics is a Pentecostal.

5.) Palin really does come across as the lady next door. Watching that video on Youtube I thought of a resemblance to several pentecostal ladies I know in Charlotte.

I’d be interested in hearing from anybody else who has a gut reaction to those video clips.

Part of the premise of Political Correctness and Multiculturalism is that White males have been oppressive and what is necessary to overcome White male injustice is to empower minorities and women. And so organizations devoted to that end have arisen. We have organizations like the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the National Organization of Women (NOW) and the Congressional Black Caucus and other sundry clubs dedicated to overthrowing evil white male rule.

Once in awhile though the curtain gets pulled back and we begin to see that these organization are not really dedicated to minority advancement so much as they are dedicated to the destroying the worldview (Christianity) that made the West the West. Every so often this whole mindset is exposed for being a clever way to destroy Christianity while using protestations about the failures in Western culture as a stalking horse to cover their anti-Christ agenda.

The fact that their agenda isn’t really about promoting the cause of minorities or women but really is devoted to an agenda to implement a pagan worldview upon the destruction of the worldview that underpins the West is seen by their response when one of the people who they are supposed to be representing goes off the reservation by supporting the worldview and ideology that made the West the West. Clarence Thomas was the first example where political correctness and multiculturalism was exposed for what it was. Clarence Thomas was a Colored man about to advance to the Supreme Court but because he wasn’t a NAACP homeboy and opposed the NAACP anti-Christ ideology it was determined by the NAACP types that he wasn’t Black enough and so wasn’t fit for the job of Supreme Court justice. The NAACP types, by their rabid opposition to Thomas as a member of SCOTUS, thus announced that the organization really isn’t about the advancement of colored people but rather it about the destruction of the Christian West through their Marxist ideology.

The next example where the myth that multiculturalism and political correctness is all about empowering and defending minorities was seen in the whole Monica Lewinsky affair. In that affair a 50 something chief executive took advantage of a 20 something female intern. In a sane world a organization devoted to defending women against abuse would have rallied behind Monica Lewinsky. Instead, what NOW types did was to support pervert Clinton, and the reason that they did so is because their agenda is not really about defending and empowering women but rather is about destroying the Christian West through their Marxist ideology. The reason they supported the aged white male pervert and perjurer is that the aged white male pervert and perjurer was their guy advancing the destruction of the West. Their organization was never about empowering or defending women. Their organization is about implementing a pagan ideology on the ashes of the Christian Worldview they are trying to destroy.

Today we are living through the most recent example where multiculturalism and political correctness is being exposed for the lying filth belief system that it really is. Sarah Palin is a woman. According to standard multicultural and political correctness belief Sarah Palin ought to be cheered on because of her nomination to the Vice Presidency. Instead those very people, who, by their own testimony ought to be championing Sarah Palin, are seeking to destroy her. Just as Clarence Thomas wasn’t the right kind of Black man to be advanced so Sarah Palin isn’t the right kind of woman to be cheered by those devoted to the death of the West. Indeed, not only is Palin not to be applauded she must be destroyed because the success of Palin, like the success of Thomas reveals that the Christian West can make room for qualified minorities. This is abhorrent to multi-culturalism and political correctness for their success relies on the idea that minorities can’t advance without them while holding a set of convictions completely contrary to their pagan worldview.

Finally, all of this exposes the emptiness when allegations of sexism and racism arise. Both of these accusations have served as the weapons of mass destruction used by people who embrace political correctness and multiculturalism against those who think they are full of shaving cream. What we are learning here is that the charges of sexism or racism, more often that not, can only be applied to people who oppose multiculturalism and political correctness. If people had asked the kind of questions of Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi that they are asking of Sarah Palin they would be labeled Sexist, but because the people who are dragging Sarah Palin through the mud have the proper pagan ideology the scurrilous sexist material that they write is perfectly acceptable.

Multiculturalism and political correctness isn’t about minority fairness. Multi-culturalism and political correctness is about destroying the worldview that made the West the West.

“You know what? Our country is the best.”

Kobe Bryant
Olympian On US Basketball Team

Yeah, what other country could you get away with a vicious rape without serving any jail time just because your a famous athlete?

Is this a great country or what?

Uses of language have historically varied according to the company one was in or according to the setting and context in which one was speaking. A man might use different language when speaking to his compatriots informally then he would use if he needed to communicate the same idea in proper company or in a formal atmosphere. Men understood that other men could take direct speech without freaking out like preadolescent little girls who have just been given a stern lecture by their fathers on not getting their assigned homework finished.

With the rise of political correctness the gonads of masculine speech are being crushed between the failing testosterone of the omnipresent metro-sexual “male” and the estrogen of a permanent and twisted feminine class who seem to be perpetually on their periods. In our henpeckified climate today it is largely irrelevant anymore whether or not one is correct in their argument if the person making the argument can be dismissed because they have violated some kind of artificial psychologically invented and p.c. enforced “you hurt my feelings” code.

Please don’t mistake this as a essay advocating brutish and sottish conversation. I’ve worked much of my life with guys who could make whole sentences using nothing but scatological language. I know what it means to hear the same exact four letter word in a sentence used as adjective, noun, and verb. When I argue for the ability for men to be able to speak as men again, I am not arguing that all men should be allowed to be verbal cretins. I am merely arguing that men be allowed to speak as men again, which means a certain pointedness,and angular brevity, garlanded with a rhetorical splash. This kind of speech is only rude if you’ve grown up during the henpeckification of masculine discourse.

The ironic thing is that the current p.c. speech that is being pursued today is not only not masculine speech it is not even feminine speech. I would be embarrassed if my daughters began to be limited by its strictures. Rather, it is a speech code designed to create timid slaves who are afraid to speak their minds lest they offend the ruling class who is making these “boy George” speech rules. This p.c. henpeckificaiton of the language has the intent of impoverishing the language so that the great ideas that need great language to be adequately expressed will be impoverished along with the language.

If you want to control a people one way to do it is by controlling their language and speech. Greatness will never arise from a people where their speakers and writers are left inchoate, inarticulate, and sissified.

“The trouble with Scotland is that it’s full of Scots….If we can’t get them out, we’ll breed them out.”

English King Edward I (Longshanks)
Dialog From The Film Braveheart

Part of the theme of Braveheart was the will of the Scottish people to retain their own unique ethnic identity over against the attempt by the English to destroy Scottish culture and ethnicity. This is a theme that is likewise picked up in the film “Rob Roy.” I’ll venture to guess that when most people viewed these films they were outraged by the attempt of the English to squash Scottish identity, ethnicity and culture as it was depicted in the film.

The attempted destruction of a set people and culture may raise the ire of movie goers but it seemingly barely raises the blood pressure of Americans as life imitates art in America. This week Americans were given a view of our end as a unique culture and people. News outlets reported that,

White people will no longer make up a majority of Americans by 2042, according to new government projections. That’s eight years sooner than previous estimates, made in 2004.

By 2050, whites will make up 46 percent of the population and blacks will make up 15 percent, a relatively small increase from today. Hispanics, who make up about 15 percent of the population today, will account for 30 percent in 2050, according to the new projections.

Asians, which make up about 5 percent of the population, are projected to increase to 9 percent by 2050.

People need to realize that this diminution of white people in the West is not some kind of freak accident. Indeed, it is not not anymore accidental then the plan of Longshanks in Braveheart to destroy the Scots. Ever since the Teddy Kennedy inspired immigration bill in the 1960’s there has been a concerted effort to destroy white ethnicity in America and the culture that is attendant with it.

This attempted destruction has not only been pursued through immigration policies but also it has been pursued through the government schools which have inculcated a mindset, through its educational and curriculum dominance, that embraces both cultural-cide and ethnocide. This idea has now likewise been picked up in Churches which have embraced the multi-cultural assumptions that are driving the elimination of the ethnic makeup that has made and makes the West, the West. The Church has taken it all one step further by wrapping the multi-cultural agenda in Christian jargon.

This drive towards the death of the West that we are heading for serves the agenda of globalist who are intent of building a uni-culture that reduces and flattens out all cultural, ethnic, religious and racial distinctiveness. What is coming in the West with the reduction of its historic majority population will either be a new mongrel ethnicity that results from the combination of intermarriage, or more likely what will occur is a balkanization where different people groups will cordon themselves into regional and demographic pockets with the peace being kept between disparate people groups by a strong centralized government.

It’s an odd thing that many Christians can watch Braveheart and cheer like wild when the Scots defeat the English attempt to crush their ethnicity and culture, and yet they get all contemptuous when some Americans desire to keep their ethnic and cultural identity accusing them of silly things like racism. Similarly, people would have understood that any ending of Braveheart where the Scots lose their ethnic, cultural and national identity would have been unsatisfactory but yet they have no problem with the prospect of America losing its ethnic, cultural and national identity.

The trouble with America is that it is full of Americans. If we can’t get them out we’ll breed them out.