Category: Ethnic considerations

Daily Kinist Quotes (DKQ)

Given the continued lobotomized lunacy of the NAPARC/CREC/SBS churches on the subject of Kinism (i.e. – racial realism, familialism, ethno-nationalism, White Christian Nationalism, etc.) I thought I would begin posting daily Kinist quotes (DKQ) in order to demonstrate how utterly braindead these “churches” are that are excommunicating, and deposing ministers over the Kinist issue as well as passing sundry language that is born of egalitarian, neo-Marxist thinking. We have established already at Iron Ink that the Church is now advocating for the very same thing that Marxists have advocated for throughout history. I have posted the Marxist quotes more than a few times. Marxists “intellectuals” would be very comfortable with the course that these denominations are pursuing. In point of fact these denominations would have to say on this point, if they were honest and consistent, that the Marxist were right when it comes to affirming a policy that pursues the elimination of nations and races.

I’ve already posted myriads of these quotes in a post here;

So Say We All … A Protest To Dr. Sproul 2.0’s Comments

I posted all these before two Anthology volumes were published that contain myriads upon myriads more quotes saying much the same thing that you will find in the above link. The volumes, “Who Is My Neighbor” and “A Survey of Racialism in Christian Sacred Tradition,” reveals that the current denominations are violating the principle of Vincent of Lerins which taught, that true Christian faith must be what has been believed “everywhere, always, and by all.” The Anabaptists, who were renown levelers, would be exceptions but the Reformed don’t consider them Christian.

As I have said before, so I say again now, this issue is to our time what the issue of the eternality of Christ was in the contest between Arius and Athanasius in the 4th century, what the contest was between Augustine and Pelagius was in the 5th century, and what the contest was between Luther and Eck was in the 16th century. If we get this issue of egalitarianism wrong here the Church of Jesus Christ will not get back on track until we finally do go back and get it right. The Reformed throughout the centuries have always fought against levelling and the erasure of God ordained distinctions because they knew that such levelling was both born of and led to levelling the distinction between God and man. Levelling the creature-creature distinctions can’t happen without levelling the Creator-creature distinction.

With all that said, I will, day by day, bring you at least one, but often a few, quotes daily demonstrating where the Church Fathers have been on this subject over the centuries. By doing so, you will see how out of step the contemporary Church (we use the word “church” only by way of courtesy) is.

“Each town should support its own poor and should not allow strange beggars to come in, WHATEVER THEY MAY CALL THEMSELVES, pilgrims or mendicant monks, (or immigrants – BLMc). Every town could feed its own poor; and if it were too small, the people in the neighboring villages should be called upon to contribute. As it is, they have to support knaves and vagabonds under the name of beggars….”

Martin Luther
Address to the Nobility of the German People

Now ask yourself, if Luther argued that strangers (whatever they may call themselves) should not be allowed into towns how much more is it the case that strangers (whatever they call themselves) should not be allowed into family lines via marriage?

Also, this quote shoots holes into the idea that we have to treat illegal immigrants in the same way as neighbor as we do deal with fellow Americans. One can argue that Christians must treat all men as neighbors but if one argues that way they must introduce the idea of gradation of neighbors. After all, if everyone is your neighbor, no one is your neighbor.

“What, there is to be no serf because Christ has redeemed us all? What is this? This means that Christian liberty is turned into liberty of the flesh? Did not Abraham and other patriarchs and prophets own serfs? Read what St. Paul has to say about servants, who at that time were all in bondage. Therefore this article is directly opposed to the Gospel and it is rapacious, for everyone who is a bondman to remove himself from his master. A bondman can very well be a Christian and have Christian freedom, just as a prisoner or a sick person can be a Christian, and yet is not free. This article proposes to free all men, and turn the spiritual kingdom of Christ into a worldly one, which is impossible. For a worldly kingdom cannot exist where there is no class distinction, where some are free, some are prisoners, some are masters, and some are vassals, etc. As St. Paul says in Gal. 3:28, that in Christ both master and vassal are one.”

Martin Luther
Admonishment to Peace on the 12 Articles of the Swabian (Anabaptist) Farmers
Works Vol. 46 – p. 39

Pretty sure that this counts as a quote that supports Southern slavery.

 

The Cultural Marxist Contradiction That Gives Away The Game

The Cultural Marxist left has a glaring contradiction at the center of their warfare against blood and soil nationhood. On one hand the WOKE crowd wants to say that nations are not blood and soil but only voluntary to anybody who would affirm certain propositions. This conviction is so central to the Cultural Marxist crowd that they will insist that an third world immigrant who has been here for 10 minutes can be just as American as a White man whose family has been here for 10 generations. At this point the Cultural Marxist vehemently denies ethnicity, heritage, and identity in favor of nations as a social construct.

However, the Left is in contradiction here when it pivots, for example, to indict the White man with colonialism or his alleged mistreatment of minorities. Now, the Cultural Marxist has shifted feet, and is now saying that ethnicity, heritage, and identity does exist. Now, it is the case for the Cultural Marxist, that a nation is not a social construct, as he insisted in the first paragraph, but rather now the Cultural Marxists are arguing that a nation is indeed a blood and soil reality filled with villains belonging to that blood and soil people.

We see thus that when it is convenient for nations to be social constructs for the Cultural Marxist they are but when it is not convenient for nations to be social constructs they are not. If guilt can be inherited then so can belonging. If the white man is uniquely guilty for his putative crimes against humanity then clearly the white man exists as a ontological reality and not as a social construct. If the past can be uniquely measured against white people then it must be the case that heritage and race does matter. But if heritage and race matter than propositional nationhood doesn’t work.

One can not consistently argue that national identity is purely voluntary as answering the question “Who is a European,” while simultaneously treating history as a moral ledger in which only one ethnic people incur guilt … indeed cannot avoid guilt due to their genetic identity.

The Cultural Marxist have a contradiction at the center of their thinking. So, either race/ethnicity is a thing so that racial guilt can be assigned with the consequence that it is not possible to arbitrarily claim that a Hottentot can just claim to be a European just because of magic dirt, or, race/ethnicity is not a thing so that racial guilt can not be assigned with the consequence that our Hottentot can claim to be a European five minutes after being here.

So, to be consistent, the Cultural Marxist has to either give up their rejection of blood and soil, the rejection which produces the whole propositional nationhood bit or they have to give up their insistence that there exists a white people who are uniquely guilty for anything. White people can’t exist to be guilty of anything if being White is just a social construct.

The blood and soil crowd, on the other hand are perfectly fine with saying that belonging to nations has a blood and soil component while being willing to accept the possibility, where it can be proven to their satisfaction, that somehow they are uniquely guilty, as a people, for this or that historical action.

Just so you know though … epistemologically self-conscious Christian Whites will argue that colonialism was a net positive good for non-White people. White people are proud of their colonial ways in which we bore the white man’s burden.

Marchin’ Lootin’ King Day … A Truly Unique American Holiday

Soon after its 1994 release, I read, “The Martin Luther King, Jr., Plagiarism Story,” by Theodore Pappas.Pappas’ manuscript was rejected 40 times from 40 publishers in 40 months before it was finally published. When it was finally published it was sell well received that it had a first edition sell out.

Nobody wanted to hear the truth about Marchin’ Lootin’ King and that explains why Pappas’ manuscript was consistently rejected. The Left so owned the publishing world that Pappas was rejected over and over again for the simple crime of telling the truth.

And what was the scandalous truth?

The truth was that King was a Doctor the way that a guy named Seuss was a Doctor. Pappas demonstrably proved that King was a liar and a cheat as seen in his repeated plagiarism on his thesis papers. King lifted whole paragraphs from books of previous writers. This was later admitted by the University granting the degree but the University refused to revoke the degree. King had become everybody’s token and once one is a token one can’t be touched.

But that was just the tip of the iceberg. Below the tip was the fact that King was a known whoremonger. One of his chief lieutenants (Ralph Abernathy) wrote of King’s extramarital affairs, including the reporting of King having sex with two women the night before he was assassinated in Memphis, Tenn., as well as having a fight with a third hooker that left her the loser of the fight. King was faithful to his wife, Coretta Scott King the way that Bill Clinton was faithful to Hillary.

King was a wretch of a man… both in his behavior and in his convictions. His Christianity was all smoke. He read the supernatural out of the Scripture. Did not believe in the virgin Birth, the resurrection, or any other miracle explaining them as happening outside history though impacting history.

King was in favor of the destruction of his own people. The last person that Blacks should esteem is Marchin’ Lootin’ King given his support for the legalizing of abortion — a legalizing which has disproportionately ravaged the Black community. King was given, by Margaret Sanger the “Margaret Sanger Award” in 1966 and wrote the words that King’s wife uttered in accepting the prize in Marchin’ Lootin’ King’s name;

“Words are inadequate for me to say how honored I was to be the recipient of the Margaret Sanger Award. This award will remain among my most cherished possessions.”

Yet, despite all this known by the powers that be, still those that hate Christ and the White race were able to shove him into the American pantheon, where, by his presence, King contradicts everything that it had previously meant to be a virtuous American. Sen. Jesse Helms (R-NC) did his best to stop this monstrosity but the “great” “Conservative” Ronald Reagan signed the bill into law making the third Monday of every January a anti-Christ holiday known as “Marchin’ Lootin’ King day.” In this act alone Ronnie Reagan should be abominated along with King.

The lifting of the King to the American pantheon was the confirmation of the most recent revamping of the US Constitution. The first revamping was under the Tyrant Abraham Lincoln. The second revamping was a collected effort of the Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt administrations. With Marchin’ Lootin’ King the US constitution is remade again and King becomes the Saint of the Civil Rights movement that accounts for the third revamping of the US Constitution. The US constitution with King and the civil rights movement makes the white man the enemy of the Federal State. What was established in principle with the civil rights movement has evolved into its inevitable outcome of set asides, quotas, which itself has evolved into DEI and WOKEISM. Without Marchin’ Lootin’ King as supported by the Bagel apparatus of the Leftist media as well as all the might of the Federal Government (beginning with Eisenhower) the Marxist Civil Rights revolution never revamps the American Constitution.

King’s pantheon status introduced contradiction into the American mythos. King could not be numbered among the heroes without there being a necessity to push other previous heroes out of the pantheon of America’s hero greats. Since the apotheosis of Marchin’ Lootin’ King, the contradiction has forced others to be demoted. All of them white men. From George Washington to the Spanish conquistador Don Juan de Oñate to Robert E. Lee to Christopher Columbus to Juan Ponce de Leon, etc. the previous monuments to America’s heroes have either been extensively vandalized or have been torn down. People don’t realize this, but all this has been done to make room for Marchin’ Lootin’ King and his Marxist grifters and rabble. Once King was apotheosized all other heroes must be seen as shameful.

King’s holiday is a day of mourning for base Americans. It is a day of mourning for epistemologically self-conscious Blacks. It is a day of mourning for all Biblical Christians because the Marxism that drove the Civil Rights movement has been in the saddle since the success of King. Marxism is the avowed enemy of Biblical Christianity. One of the really sad things is that since the success of the Civil Rights Movement and Marchin’ Lootin’ King the conservative Reformed/Evangelical Church has reinterpreted the Christian faith through the lens of Marxism. This was most clearly seen when conservative Evangelical and Reformed types came together to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Marchin’ Lootin’ King’s 50th anniversary marking his death. In that conference Reformed leaders reiterated over and over again how this vile man was a Saint of God.

This holiday is especially heinous because it is the one holiday of the year where we are especially lectured by the elite in the fields of journalism, Government, and corporate America about the glories of its founder and his mission/vision. We are harangued and lectured how we need to “complete the vision of King.” We are told endlessly about how racist America remains. We are chided for not advancing far enough fast enough. You can bet today you will read article and columns connecting the sainted King with the poor persecuted immigrants being arrested by wicked evil white ICE agents. On holidays like Columbus day we get all kinds of gobbledygook language about it really being “indigenous people day.” On Independence Day we get columns and articles about how wicked our white founders were. On Christmas we get columns and articles about how Jesus isn’t really who the Scriptures say He is. However on Marchin’ Lootin’ King day we get “all hail the power of Martin’s name, let angels prostrate fall.”

In all seriousness, the King celebration is, in reality, a humiliation ritual for white Americans who know their history and who haven’t become mind numbed normies.

With the success of King, the halo of sanctity unto the end of special rights/privilege now finds not only the Black man ensconced in a safety zone of untouchable status but also now all minorities, all women, and all sexual perverts. This is the constituency of the Democratic party that the Republican party will not touch.

Don’t get me wrong. I could see celebrating a day set aside for a Black man like Booker T. Washington who emphasized the need for the Black man to pursue vocational education as an opportunity for economic security which would be more valuable to the Black man than social advantages, higher education, or political office. Washington’s speech was highlighted by his statement;

 “In all things that are purely social we can be as separate as the fingers, yet one as the hand in all things essential to mutual progress.”

Washington was loudly applauded by his audience in Atlanta and yet he was seen as a Uncle Tom by his own people who had determined that they would rather follow a man like W. E. Dubois, and later King who marketed grievance like the ADL markets Jewish oppression.

So, mark yet another Marchin’ Lootin’ King day. The deity lives on in America and the posterity of those that built America continue to serve those who would replace that posterity.

Rev. Joe Spurgeon On Whites Being Replaced; Right Message – Wrong Messenger

Stick with me here. The irony comes at the end.

Rev. Joe Spurgeon (RJS) writes;

“Everyone wants to talk about demographics change but very few are willing to tell the truth about where much of the blame lies.”

Bret responds,

The issue here that Joe is bringing to our attention is the problem the West is having with demographic change. When you peel this back, that problem is that the West (and the US) is becoming less white. That Joe is focusing on White people not replacing themselves is seen in the multiple times he uses the word “White.”

RJS writes;

White Americans do not have a replacement level birth rate. The total fertility rate for white women in the United States sits well below 2.1 children per woman. That means the population is shrinking on its own, before immigration is even part of the equation.

Bret responds,

Here Joe brings out the failure of white people to replace themselves. Clearly Joe thinks this is a bad thing. I agree with Joe that it is a bad thing.

RJS writes,

At the same time, hundreds of thousands of white babies are aborted every year. Roughly a quarter of all abortions in the United States are performed on white women. That is an entire generation being erased before it ever sees daylight.

Bret responds,

Joe once again focuses on the white babies aborted. Joe is clearly zeroing in the collapse of White America. I agree with Joe that this is horrid.

As an aside… it is interesting that though America, demographically, remains 61% white, only 25% of abortions in these united States are done by white people. That means the abortion industry thrives off of the minority community.

RSJ writes,

Add to this the widespread use of birth control (which is itself abortifacient). Millions of white women are on the pill alone, intentionally preventing conception for years at a time. Children are delayed, downsized, or avoided altogether in the name of convenience, autonomy, or lifestyle preservation.

Bret responds,

Again, I completely agree with Joe here.

Joe writes,

A people that kills its children in the womb and refuses to have enough children to replace itself will not survive.

Bret responds,

Keep in mind that the “people” that Joe has been talking about is white people. It is white people who will not survive because they are not replacing themselves. This is the demographic change that Joe wrote of in his opening salvo.

Joe writes,

This is not primarily something being done to white Americans. It is something white Americans are doing to themselves.

Bret responds,

Note again… it is white Americans that Joe’s whole piece is about. Again, I agree with what Joe says here.

RJS writes,

A civilization cannot be sustained on abortion, sterility, and self hatred. If a people wants to endure, it must choose life, marriage, and fruitfulness again.

Bret responds,

Joe talks about (white) people wanting to endure. Joe talks about the need for white people to choose life, marriage, and fruitfulness. I agree.

The kicker here is that Joe writes all this as a white man who has not replaced himself. Joe hasn’t aborted his children. Joe did choose life and Joe did choose fruitfulness. However, what Joe did not choose was the very thing he is lecturing white people on … Joe did not choose replacement. Joe as a white man has not replaced himself. Joe married a non-caucasian woman and had many children who can not be considered replacements for Joe.

So, Joe complains (rightfully) that white people have sinned in not replacing themselves… Joe complains (rightfully) about demographic change, and yet Joe has four fingers pointing back at him as Rev. Joe points at white people for the sin of not replacing themselves.

So, I am to understand that a man who married a non-White woman is now lecturing other white people on their sin of not replacing themselves because of inadequate birthrates?

I want to make something clear here. I get why some people might marry outside their race. I get that there are going to be situations where that happens. I am glad for Joe that he has a radiant wife and many children. Further, I’m confident that all those children are Christian children.

What I don’t get is how such a guy can have the stones to complain that their race of origin is not replacing itself, when in point of fact, Joe has contributed to the demographic change that he is lamenting. If it is sin for white people to pursue death by not replacing themselves then that has to include not only abortion, and abortifacients as causes of white people not replacing themselves, but it must also include, as causative, large numbers of the population marrying outside their race and having non-white children.

The truth that has to be added to all the truth that Rev. Joe Spurgeon brought is that if Whites want to halt the demographic change in these united States they have to cease with interracial marriage because interracial marriage as well as abortion and abortifacients contributes to the demographic change here that Joe rightly laments.

Bottom line here … Joe has given us the right message, but he is the wrong messenger.

Addendum

1.) Someone has argued that white miscegenation compared to white abortion is akin to comparing the Himalayas to a molehill. I concur that abortion and abortifacients are a far larger problem however, consider that 17% of all new marriages in the US are interracial and by 2050, it is projected that 1 in 5 newlyweds in the US will have a spouse of a different race or ethnicity, indicating a continued rise in interracial relationships.

So… the Himalayas to molehill analogy doesn’t really work.

2.) Also on this matter we have to consider that one abortion kills one white child, while marrying outside one’s race prohibits many potential white children being birthed.

3.) Dan Brannan notes on this subject;

Both miscegenation and abortion remove a member of the nation. But one (miscegenation) also adds a member of an outgroup in amongst us. One (abortion) is murder of an individual. The other (miscegenation) is essentially murder of the nation.

Ryan Louis Underwood Unearths A Kinist Quote From Prominent Anglican

“Around the Englishman are others, born of the same race, speaking the same language, living under the same laws, fed from the same soil; In fact, satisfying almost all of the conditions under which a family exists together in its home. Sprung from different parents, localized in different neighborhoods, there is yet one common parent of all these, and one unvarying home. Our country is our general Mother, and her bounds our natural home.

Within those limits, we are like brothers and sisters of a family, not strangers, but native: not guests but members.

Whatever is there, is, in place and degree, for us; for the body of which we are parts, and for us, inasmuch as we are bound up with the body …

As regards the rest of the world, the nation is as one: as regards one another, national greatness, national advantages, national success and failure are common to all its citizens. In all these particular does the mind, true to its original training, recognize and embrace as a great home, the common country of the whole race of which the individual forms a part.

A man finds himself bound to his fellow-countrymen by a common language, which has grown up amidst events, and bears trace of changes, whose effects are still acting on the great brotherhood of the nation.
The history of their country is the history of all.”

Henry Alford – 1810-1871
Anglican Dean Of Canterbury Cathedral
The Nation An Extension of Family
Lectures on the 5th Commandment