Liberty & Intermediate Institutions

“Rulers who wish to attach the loyalty of the citizens unconditionally to the state apparatus do everything in their power to detach them from intermediate loyalties. They are abetted by one of the delusions of Libertarianism, which often unwittingly aids the state in its aim… In asserting total autonomy in those ways, the individualist sets the stage for his complete loss of liberty, for there is nothing to protect him from the Idol State, which is too happy to assist in the destruction of intermediate institutions.”

Hebert Schlossberg

Idols for Destruction

Note one of the implications here is that Libertarians and Collectivists work cheek by jowl in their allegedly opposite work. If Libertarians are successful in their political pursuits the result will be the eventual ascendancy of Collectivism and if Collectivists are successful in their political pursuits the result will be the eventual revolt of the Libertarian. This is because as Schlossberg notes they are each doing the same work of destroying the intermediate institutions so that all that remains is the atomized individual who can only find identity as set against the backdrop of the State.

Libertarians do this by insisting on the “freedom” from all mediating institutions in the name of individual sovereignty, resulting in an individual who can only understand themselves against the background of a sovereign state. Collectivists do this by insisting that all is inside the state and nothing is outside the state, thus insuring that individual can only understand themselves against the background of the state.

Schlossberg underscores this when elsewhere he pens,

“Collectivism and egoism (Libertarianism) are both derived from immanence, both can live only when the limitations of transcendent law are overthrown, both are symptoms of the same disease. If it is lawful for the individual to do as he pleases, why should it not be lawful for the commisar to do as he pleases? If there is nothing to restrain one lawfully, then there is nothing to restrain the other.”

Another implication here is that there is can be no genuine liberty where the intermediate institutions are destroyed. Man can not be free apart from belonging to intermediate institutions like family, church, and nation (as distinct from the state). When these institutions are eclipsed man loses his identity and has only his collective self in the tyrant state wherein to determine his identity and so meaning. True liberty can only prosper where family, church, and nation have interdependent liberties befitting their natural and God-assigned jurisdictions.

Think about where we are now. The Church is now an extension of the State. We see this in the majority of Churches who are now reinterpreting Christianity through the prism of Cultural Marxism, Critical Race Theory, and Wokeification. There really no longer exists an Institutional Christian Chuch whose voice is strong enough to challenge the presuppositions of the God state. Individual churches and voices exist but in terms of cultural infrastructure leverage the church is dead and is owned by the State. The same is true of the family as institution. Individual families exist who understand their appointed jurisdictional authority but like the Church the family’s cultural infrastructure as a means of leverage is dead.  So, the State has succeeded in destroying the intermediate institutions.

And until we rebuild those intermediate institutions, culturally and institutionally speaking, God is dead.

Wherein Feminists and Trannies Have Different Political Interests — The Pervert Coalition is Fracturing

So for over a century feminists have been insisting that the idea of male and female roles don’t really exist and are caricatures of reality. Now, the trannie movement comes along and the men posing as women are incarnations of the very stereotypes that the Feminists have been fighting against for decades. Trannie men, with notable exceptions, seem to go for the “woman as sexual object” angle.  The trannie movement gives us drag queens that are trying to emphasize extreme female sexuality. The trannie movement gave us Bruce Jenner and his cover girl pin-up spread in Vogue magazine — again the very thing Feminists hate. Now via the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, a trannie is portraying women as “sexual.” Feminists who have been fighting against the objectification of women as sexual objects are going nuts seeing trannies communicate that what it means to be a real woman is to be a sexual object.

The Trannies in sports aren’t endearing the feminists either. Here feminists have fought forever for the “right” to compete like men in sports. For decades women fought for title IX which allowed big money to support women’s sports. Finally, women’s sports gains a toehold of attention and now suddenly women’s sports find biological men winning gold, silver, and bronze medals in the winner’s circle. How can feminists be satisfied that their sports are being taken over by men? Feminist and Lesbian Martina Navratilova is not satisifed,

“To put the argument at its most basic: a man can decide to be female, take hormones if required by whatever sporting organization is concerned, win everything in sight and perhaps earn a small fortune, and then reverse his decision and go back to making babies if he so desires.”

“It’s insane and it’s cheating. I am happy to address a transgender woman in whatever form she prefers, but I would not be happy to compete against her. It would not be fair.”

Of course Martina was slammed (pun) for this observation by the Cultural Marxist left. There is some delicious irony here inasmuch as Martina the lesbian is complaining about Martin the tranny.

Then there is the quota competition. Women had a clear field in hiring preferences when competing against men for job positions. Now suddenly women are losing at least some of their hiring slots to tranny men who are now claiming to be women. It is more likely now that a tranny man who is now playing “woman” will get that plumb job in the Corporate hierarchy over the woman who has real female plumbing because a tranny has more intersectionality power than a plain old woman. Proof of this is the recent hire in the Biden administration of the tranny Richard Levine (nee – Rachel) to be assistant secretary of health. A feminist could well look at that appointment and realize that Levine took the job that a feminist may well have filled.

It is clear that Feminism and Tranny-ism are not natural bedfellows. (There is a pun there somewhere.)  Women who demand rights for women to be like men are not natural allies with men who demand the right to be women with the result that they reinforce negative female stereotypes, crush women in sports competitions, and who take potential feminist jobs.

The Virtue of Doubt?

Recently I heard an account where a Pastor was faulted for the certainty he brought with him in delivering his sermons. The comment was made to this good man, “You act as if you can just slap the doubt out of people.”

I am still alternating between laughter and incredulity over this account. Never mind the irony that this person who came to his pastor was certain that his pastor was being overly certain. Never mind the implied desire for incertitude to come from the pulpit on matters of eternal life and death. Nevermind that many Pastors rightly wish indeed it was only as simple a matter as slapping the doubt out of people.  What is the most appalling about this statement is that it came from an Elder.

However, this attitude that hates certitude as coming from the pulpit is merely the spirit of the age. Postmodernism does not allow any minister to insist upon capital “T” truth opting instead for person variable small “t” truth. When one believes in capital “T” truth and one has studied to show himself approved a workman who needeth not to be ashamed then certitude is the coin of the realm. On the other hand, if a member of the clergy is stuck in the slough of pomo then the only certitude that is allowed is the certitude that incertitude is to be prized above all else. Such clergy never give a “thus saith the Lord,” preferring instead to offer, “well, perhaps this is something that might be true for some of us? However, I don’t want to force on you my truth.”

Masters of the certainty of incertitude say stupid things like, “It’s not about the destination. The joy is in the journey.” Pardon me but if it is not about the destination then why are we on this blinkin’ journey? Masters of the certainty of incertitude will never ever tell somebody they are wrong, spank their children, or remain in Churches that have ministers who are certain. They are the very definition of Beta males and female campus ministry workers.

Even back when I was in Corporate America they were training their leaders in this mind. Managers were told not to confront employees but instead to “come alongside.” They were to try and see themselves as “coaches” and “cheerleaders,” and not “bosses.” Bottled estrogen was provided at all these Corporate meetings.

As for me, I want to have the doubt slapped out of me. I don’t want a minister who can only share with me his own incertitudes from the pulpit. I need someone to point the way. I don’t need someone to sit down and cry with me. This is not a call for a lack of compassion, but a recognition that compassion uncoupled from the truth that points to a way out is the compassion of the effeminate.

Now, I quite admit that certitude coming from stupid people is quite the irritant, but at the end of the day when your certain Pastor is not seeking to slap the doubt out of you, your certain Pastor is instead seeking to say that your doubts are OK. Both of these approaches are birthed of certitude but only one of them has the aroma of Christ.

Sen. Tom Cotton Exposes SPLC as Racist Sexist Organization

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6021856661001#sp=show-clips

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) per Sen. Tom Cotton is “a racket.” The way the game works is the 500million dollar endowed SPLC as operating from the Cultural Marxist Left is the attack dog for the Cultural Marxist left assigned the responsibility of labeling center-right organizations as “extremist hate groups.” The SPLC then turns that information to the Cultural Marxist media outlets who then use their platforms to continue the smear all with the purpose of scaring away the donor base of those groups that the Cultural Marxist SPLC and the Cultural Marxist advocacy media.

Watch the 5 minute video and let me know what you think. Interesting that the SPLC ran into a buzz saw that saw the departure of some of its top officials for the very real offenses that they routinely wrongly accuse other organizations. Who would have ever thought that officials at the SPLC would get taken down for charges of racism and sexism? I think that is what is called poetic justice.

My Time In Purgatory — III

In this segment of “My Time In Purgatory,” I’m going to go ahead a wee bit to look at recent developments. However, I am not done with examining the Clown Reformed Church and my time when they had to survive my presence for nearly 25 years.

Following the labeling by the Southern Poverty Law Center (the mother of all euphemisms) of Charlotte Christ the King Reformed as an extremist hate group, the Clown Reformed Church rushed out with their own press release touching all that had happened in 2018. Clearly, the CRC was trying to get out in front of the SPLC story so it wouldn’t splash back on them if it was discovered that at one time the congregation I served for 50 years thought about actually joining the CRC. The Clown Reformed Church press release was filled with the same slander and libel we have come to love and expect from the CRC.

The first error in a cascade of errors ranging from lies to stupidity as from the Press Spokesman – Rev. Smythe Raginwald – was his statement that it was only after the denomination cut me loose as a minister that the congregation I serve itself left the denomination. In point of fact, the Congregation left the Clown Reformed Church in November of 2018. The Denomination did not cut me loose officially until June of 2019. The Church’s leaving the CRC falls in the category of “A better decision has never been made.” My only regret, as the Pastor, is that the congregation didn’t leave in 1995 when I showed up but the congregation that finally left in 2018 was a very different congregation that existed in 1995.

Next in our lineup of dissemblers, the disingenuous, and fabricators is one Rev. Ben Kieber. Rev. Kieber was a chap brought in as an assistant to work in the flagship church of the District. In no short time, Kieber demonstrated his unfamiliarity with loyalty as he connived with another female staff member to have their Senior Pastor tossed for the equivalent of jaywalking.

In the Press Release, Rev. Ben Kieber misrepresents the meaning of “Kinism,” which is commonly done by the enemies of Kinism so that the Cultural Marxists like Kieber may continue to smear the one school of thought which is opposing its Cultural Marxist goal of egalitarianism. Kinism is not a movement. You cannot write a letter and send it to the Kinism Headquarters. Because Kinism is not a movement it is instead a constellation of varying beliefs that are held in different combinations by different “kinists.” As such before one can pontificate on what Kinism is and is not one needs to be specific as to which Kinist he is talking about. There are many individuals who self-identify as “Kinists” who someone as myself, who is Kinist sympathetic, given my own definition, that I would want to distance myself from. What Rev. Kieber seeks to do is to speak in unseemly generalities that do not fit a great number of people who are kinist sympathetic or who might self-identify as Kinist.

Per Kieber my great Kinist crime per his exhaustive in-depth research that was reported to the District Denominational meeting, as reported by the regional and subscription starved Newspaper was that;

According to his (Kieber’s) research, which Kieber shared with the State Journal, Rachel Simone spoke at the Charlotte church in July 2017. Simone is the founder, promoter, and fundraiser for the white nationalist group Suidlanders of the Republic of South Africa.”

That’s it. I was hounded by these piss ant Cultural Marxist Social Justice Warriors because we had a person in the Pulpit reporting on the crimes of the Marxist African National Congress party in South Africa perpetrated against the South African Boers. We sat for 30 minutes listening to this person pleading for help against the atrocities being committed against White farmers in S. Africa and Rev. Ben Kieber presented this as evidence that I was a heretical kinist? Can you say, idiot? I also think it was evil for the Communists to have murdered the Polish Officer Corps in the Katyn forest. By Ben Kieber’s standard that makes me guilty of being a Nazi. Can you say, idiot?

Secondly, Kieber identifies as “Kinist” what until just a few generations ago was considered just standard Christianity.

Kieber offered.

McAtee taught and wrote about Kinism, a theology that holds to a belief that races should be kept separate and that people should not marry outside their race.”

Allow me to plead here for people to purchase the Achord & Dow Anthology, “Who is my Neighbor; An Anthology In Natural Relations,” so they can see for themselves what an idiotic thing Kieber offered above. In the Achord & Dow book, the Cultural Marxism that Kieber and the CRC are trying to sell as normative Christian theology is forever seen as jejune. Christians have always believed that people have a natural and entirely normal love for their own people that results in people groups naturally associating with their own people groups. McAtee’s belief has not so much been that “races should be kept separate,” as it has been that the Cultural Marxists should not be successful in putting all races in a racial blender and hitting the high button. The kind of Marxism that Kieber and the CRC are advocating by attacking my beliefs is as old as Marx, Engels, Lenin, and the boys.

“The aim of socialism is not only to abolish the present division of mankind into small states and end all national isolation; not only to bring the nations closer together, but to merge them….”

Vladimir Lenin
The Rights of Nations to Self Determination — pg. 76

1.) ”What will be the attitude of communism to existing nationalities?

The nationalities of the peoples associating themselves in accordance with the principle of community will be compelled to mingle with each other as a result of this association and hereby to dissolve themselves, just as the various estate and class distinctions must disappear through the abolition of their basis, private property.”

~ Frederick Engels in “The Principles of Communism”, 1847

4.) “… Just as mankind can achieve the abolition of classes only by passing through the dictatorship of the proletariat, so mankind can achieve the inevitable merging of nations only by passing through the transition period of complete liberation of all oppressed nations, i.e., their right to secede. “

Vladimir Lenin 
The Rights of Nations to Self Determination 

5.) “Even the natural differences within species, like racial differences…, can and must be done away with historically.”

 K. Marx’s Collected Works V:103,As cited in S.F. Bloom’s The World of Nations: AStudy of the National Implications in the Work of Karl Marx, Columbia University Press, New York, 1941, pp. 11 & 15-19:

For those like Kieber whose reading comprehension skills are challenged allow me to give you the easy version of these quotes. “Marxism has always advocated for the destruction of nations and races by means of amalgamation.”

My real offense against the Clown Reformed Church was that I was and remain opposed to this doctrine of demons that Kieber and the CRC is pushing. That doctrine of demons is the doctrine that would forever sink God’s racial diversity in a sea of monism in the name of “diversity.”

Now as to the accusation that I don’t believe people from other races should marry I again appeal to Church history to demonstrate that if I am guilty of that then I am guilty along with the Church fathers.

“Love imagines that it can overleap the barriers of race and blood and religion, and in the enthusiasm and ecstasy of choice these obstacles appear insignificant. But the facts of experience are against such an idea. Mixed marriages are rarely happy. Observation and experiences demonstrate that the marriage of a Gentile and Jew, a Protestant and a Catholic, an American and a Foreigner has less chance of a happy result than a marriage where the man and woman are of the same race and religion….”

Dr. Clarence MacCartney
20th Century Conservative Presbyterian Minister

Causes of Separation in 1973 (PCA separates from PCUS) by Dr. John Edwards Richards

  • The Socialist, who declares all men are equal.  Therefore there must be a great leveling of humanity and oneness of privilege and possession.
  • The Racial Amalgamationist, who preaches that the various races should be merged into one race and differences erased in oneness.
  • The Communist, who would have one mass of humanity coerced into oneness by a totalitarian state and guided exclusively by Marxist philosophy.
  • The Internationalist, who insists on co-existence between all peoples and nations that they be as one regardless of ideology or history.John Edwards Richards

    One of the founders of the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA).

  • “The vast majority of good thinking people prefer to associate with, and intermarry with, people of their respective race; this is part of the God-given inclination to honor and uphold the distinctiveness of separate races. But there are many false prophets of oneness, and many shallow stooges, who seek to force the amalgamation of the races.”

    Dr. John E. Richards
    The Racial Problem Facing America (1964)

    The casual reader should not be so foolish as to think that I only have a few quotes to support my position. I have so many quotes from the Church fathers going back thousands of years that it would make Ben Keiber weary just considering having to read all the quotes I have.

    So, Rev. Kieber misses the mark on his criticism of me. I have always believed that while it is not a good idea for people of different races to marry, I have also expressly taught that once such an unwise marriage covenant is entered into the Church should do all it can to support that marriage covenant.

    We are not done with Kieber yet. The man put his foot in it when he volunteered quotes for the regional newspaper hit piece and now Kieber is going to be made to eat both his feet.

    Kieber was quoted in the regional newspaper hit piece that “the denomination’s pastors knew what McAtee was teaching in 2016 and made efforts to address it.”

    This one gives me a belly laugh. Nobody from that god-forsaken denomination ever had one substantive conversation with me about what I had been writing for 20 years. Second, what kind of denomination is it that takes 20 years before it realizes that it has a minister who is putatively teaching rank heresy? I was 20 years in a pulpit they mistakenly thought was theirs and only caught up with my transgressions 2o years later? Talk about incompetence.

As we finish off this installment we look at more statements made by Rev. Smythe Raginwald. Rev. Smythe Raginwald is an Afro-American and leading Social Justice Warrior in the Clown Reformed Church.

Rev. Raginwald said that my beliefs (which to this day have not been given an examination by someone other than Cultural Marxist Social Justice Warriors) were a wake-up call for the CRC. I understand why he would say such a thing. All Cultural Marxists should fear those who are articulating Biblical Christianity. Rev. Raginwald bemoaned the environment where kinism could grow unimpeded. This is the complaint of a Cultural Marxist who believes that God wants all colors to bleed into one. As I’ve demonstrated the Church throughout history has always been conscious about the goodness of God in creating different races.

Here is a quote from a leading Presbyterian of his time. It is typical Reformed thinking;

“If from this we may conclude that ethnic pluriformity is the revealed will of God for the human race in its present situation, it is highly questionable whether the Christian can have part in any program that would seek to erase all ethnic distinctions. That such distinctions may be crossed over by individuals may be granted, but it is at least questionable whether a program designed to wipe out such differences on a mass scale should be endorsed by the Christian. It is this line of argument that the average Christian segregationist uses to back his view. He fears that the real goal of the integrationist is the intermarriage of the races, and therefore the breakdown of the distinctions between them. Many who would be willing to integrate at various lesser levels refuse to do so, simply because they feel that such will inevitably lead to intermarriage of the races, which they consider to be morally wrong. . . .

The mass mixing of the races with the intent to erase racial boundaries he does consider to be wrong, and on the basis of this, he would oppose the mixing of the two races in this way. Let it be acknowledged that a sin in this area against the Negro race has been perpetrated by godless white men, both past and present, but this does not justify the adoption of a policy of mass mixing of the races. Rather, the Bible seems to teach that God has established and thus revealed his will for the human race now to be that of ethnic pluriformity, and thus any scheme of mass integration leading to mass mixing of the races is decidedly unscriptural.

Dr. Morton H. Smith 1923 – 2018
Presbyterian Minister

Rev. Smythe Raginwald managed to complain to the Cultural Marxist newspaper rag that when he came to visit our small church he was “the only Black person there.” This is another knee slapper. Rev. Raginwald could have visited nearly all the Churches in Charlotte and he would have discovered the same thing given that 95.1% of Charlotte’s population is white. Now combine that with the fact that somehow Rev. Raginwald managed to miss observing the other non-Caucasian person who was in attendance at the Church I serve on that morning.

We’ve already dealt, in past entries with Raginwald’s misinformation about the crimes being committed in S. Africa so there is no need to pick that up again. Suffice it to say that there is tons of information out there demonstrating the problem that White Boer farmers are having in avoiding being murdered in S. Africa.

Finally, Rev. Raginwald said Per the regional Newspaper;

Smythe went alone to the service but, he said, ‘if I had taken my wife Karen, who is white, we would have been heretical in the eyes of this pastor.”

Actually, at the time Smith attended the Church already had a mixed-race couple regularly attending for quite some time and neither myself nor anybody in the congregation screamed “heresy.
” We have also had, in the past, families attend who were mixed-race and neither I nor anybody else objected to their presence. It is just an ignorance of epic proportions for  Raganwald to claim that I would have thought he was heretical merely for having a white wife when in point of fact I think him heretical for embracing Cultural Marxist tenets.

In the end, it is not Rev. McAtee who is in error here, but to the contrary, it is Rev. Kieber, Rev. Raginwald, and others from the Clown Reformed Church who have embraced the heresy of Cultural Marxism. If I reject them, I reject them not because of who they are married to nor even because of how torpid they are, but rather because – either self-consciously or not – they have embraced the doctrine of Cultural Marxism. This is unequivocally wrong.