Category: Uncategorized

According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, mask-wearing is:

“A form of disguise or concealment usually worn over or in front of the face to hide the identity of a person and by its own features to establish another being.”

The mask completes the work of the Globalists to turn man into a cog so that all cogs are seen as mere replacement for other cogs. Look at crowds as they are each and all masked. What you gaze upon is a sea of undifferentiated human cogs. The individual and the personal is lost in a sea of sameness. Masking is the perfect egalitarian move.

Even more than the French Revolution Phrygian cap or the Chinese Maoist Revolutionary Mao Suit, the mask communicates the apex of the egalitarian drone. With the wide wearing of the mask an occult transformation has occurred. Man in the image of God has become the Borg in the image of the Sovereign State.

Mask wearing then, when not necessary, is anti-Christ and Pastors who keep writing hallmark tropes on how one is showing Jesus love are doing anti-Christ work. They fail to realize not only what has been said above but they fail to realize that the mask is merely conditioning for one more step into the breech of Government tyranny. Masks prepare the way for mandatory vaccines. These vaccines, like the masks, are violations of the 6th commandment. Ministers who support this stuff are ministering Lucifer more than they are ministering Christ.

If you are a member of a Church which is taking this whole Wuhan virus thing seriously you need to get out of that Church as fast as you can. You are in a Statist Church who worships according to the dictates of Caesar and not the dictates of God.

Dear Pastor,

I have a friend who has a question on cessationism. Here is my question. (Actually it’s his question.) He wanted to know how it is that I make the distinction between a prophet called by God to speak for God to monarchs and to Israel and to the church — as well as to write scripture — which I was saying I thought was one kind of prophet, yet I then also wanted to distinguish the idea of prophecy as it’s described by Paul when he says that there are some who have a gift of prophecy. My friend is wanting to know how I know that Paul was not referring to the idea of ongoing prophecy. I’m clear that there is no ongoing prophecy or new revelation since the closing of the Cannon, but I’m wondering about how to clarify Paul’s meaning of prophecy And it’s ongoing application for the church today?

Clifford

Dear Clifford,

Thank you for the question. Let me know if I don’t give you enough information or if I have not answered the question.

First we would note that the word “Prophet” has a narrow and a broad meaning. Narrowly considered the word Prophet means fore-teller. This is one who predicts or sees the future. This would have been one dynamic of most of the Biblical prophets through the OT and NT until the closing of the cannon. There is a broader meaning of the word that means “Forth-teller.” A prophet by this definition is one who speaks forth the word of God in their speech. The Heidelberg catechism (and Biblical Christianity as a whole) holds that all Christians are Prophets in this broad sense of the Word.

Second, in terms of ongoing prophecy, I would say to your friend that there was ongoing prophecy until the close of the canon. The way we can know that is from Scripture. I Corinthians 13:8 teaches,

“Love never fails. But whether there are prophecies, they will fail; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will vanish away.”

Prophecies, in the sense of fore-telling the future (narrow sense of the idea of prophecy) will come to an end. Tongues will cease. Knowledge (in the sense of charismatic ‘word of knowledge’) will vanish away.

Finally I would point him to Hebrews 1

1 God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, 2 has in these last days spoken to us by His Son….

There is no further need for the various ways that God previously spoke since God has spoke finally (in these last days) by His Son.

And where do we find the Son speaking?

In the Scriptures.

Scripture teaches cessationism and any desire for God to continue to speak only dilutes the importance of His speaking in Scripture for if God continues to give verbal revelation then the verbal revelation that He has given in Scripture is reduced in import. Why look to old Revelation when one has newer Revelation to access?

“A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon –authoritarian means, if such there be at all; and if the victorious party does not want to have fought in vain, it must maintain this rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionaries. Would the Paris Commune have lasted a single day if it had not made use of this authority of the armed people against the bourgeois? Should we not, on the contrary, reproach it for not having used it freely enough?”

Vladimir Lenin

Note that in the Leninist model Terror must be instilled in the population. There can never be too much terror in a Communist Revolution. It is how the wolf Marxists keep the sheep population at bay. When Bella Kohn’s Communist government failed in 1919 Kun reputedly said that the reason the government failed was that there was not enough blood spilled… not enough terror pursued.

One of Kun’s co-Revolutionary’s confirms Kohn’s conviction,

Tibor Szamuely  was Deputy People’s Commissar of War and People’s Commissar of Public Education during the short lived 1919 Hungarian Communist Government. Szamuely wrote,

“Now the power is in our hands. Who wants the old reign to come back, they should be hanged quickly. The one of this kind must be neck-bitten. The victory of Hungarian proletariat till this time required no serious numbers of victims. But now there is the need of bloodshed. We mustn’t be afraid of blood, the blood is like steel: strengthens the hearth and strengthens the proletarian class. Blood will make us gigantean. […] We will exterminate the whole bourgeoisie, if we have to.”

Revolution, in the Communist model, is accomplished by Terror and force of arms and right now the Terror that is being used is the mask. The mask terrorizes the population and fills people with fear. The mask has the same effect as the threat of being visited by the secret police. The mask makes you conscious of your fear all the time and even when you are not wearing a mask and only seeing others wearing a mask you are reminded that terror is stalking you. The mask is the shedding of blood while keeping the sheep alive.

If you are voluntarily wearing a mask you are contributing to the terrorism of your fellow citizen.

And that action, you dumbass clergy, is the very opposite of loving Jesus.

First there was Ella followed by Lee
So began the heirs of clan McAtee
Then followed Edward followed by Bret
The Marxists began to see the growing ominous threat

Next were birthed William and then Gwenevere
And now the enemy became familiar with fear
Followed soon Louis and Ben
The Marxist could see their ultimate end

Next came our two maidens so fair
Winry and Aurelia — “the Marxist’s despair”
And next the wicked meet “the Hammer” and Al
And departs from the villains all remaining morale

And clan McAtee is far from yet done
More arrows will follow to slay Marxist hun
More warriors and shield maidens to fill McAtee ranks
More babies for which the world will one day give thanks

“Woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the Sabbath day; For there shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.” Matthew 24:19f If this “great tribulation” refers to 70 AD (and I’m convinced that it does) then the focus on the 20th century “holocaust” that suggests that particular tribulation is the greatest of all Jewish tribulations is unbiblical. Such a 20th century focus also does the work of minimizing the reason for this “great tribulation” of AD 70 that was found in the just punishment of the Jews for their crime in the crucifixion of the Christ and replaces it with a focus on the putative innocence of the Jews at the hands of those reported to have been Christians. That what God calls “The great tribulation” as recompense for the Jewish crime of the slaughter of their Messiah has been the standard reading of Scripture up until the second half of the 20th century. Many respected exegetes and theologians throughout history married this promised “great tribulation” as consequence to deicide just as they married the self-maledictory oath of Mat 27:25, ‘Then all the people answered and said, Let His blood be on us and on our children.’ with the blood of 1.1 million deaths in AD 70 at the hands of the Roman Armies. Evidence of this connecting of AD 70 with the Jewish self-maledictory oath as standard Christian interpretation is seen in the examples below, C.H. Spurgeon (1834-1892), wrote, ‘For there shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.” Read the record written by Josephus of the destruction of Jerusalem, and see how truly our Lord’s words were fulfilled. The Jews impiously said, concerning the death of Christ, “His blood be on us, and on our children.” Never did any other people invoke such an awful curse upon themselves, and upon no other nation did such a judgment ever fall. We read of Jews crucified till there was no more wood for making crosses; of thousands of the people slaying one another in their fierce faction fights within the city; of so many of them being sold for slaves that they became a drug in the market, and all but valueless; and of the fearful carnage when the Romans at length entered the doomed capital; and the blood-curdling story exactly bears out the Savior’s statement uttered nearly forty years before the terrible events occurred.’ And again in the pages of the Geneva Study Bible, ‘The destruction of Jerusalem was more terrible than anything that the world has ever witnessed, either before or since. Even Titus seemed to see in his cruel work the hand of an avenging God.’ (Commentary on Matthew, p. 412-413). Matthew Henry offers, “The Jews’ curse upon themselves has been awfully answered in the sufferings of their nation.” If this reading is accurate then when we read in Matthew 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. it informs us that the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 was a greater tribulation than what is called today, “The Holocaust.”