Category: Uncategorized

Two Templates Through Which One Might Read Russia-Ukraine

Template #1

Vladimir is an old styled Russian Nationalist who believes in Russia. He understands that Russia is in danger. Birthrates are well below replacement rates. Further, the NWO via NATO keeps hemming Russia in by absorbing or threatening to absorb former countries in the historic sphere of Russian influence. In 2008 Putin’s Russia made NATO’s ability to swallow Georgia impossible by military action. In 2008 NATO passed the Bucharest declaration putting Georgia and Ukraine on path for NATO membership. Putin demanded that the promise from our American President, that NATO would NOT move toward them be honored. The answer was “no,” so Putin invaded Georgia as he had threatened to do.

Now, in 2022, on the 8th year anniversary of the coup that replaced Russian simpatico Yanukovych for a Western sympathetic replacement Putin finally sets matters right by rolling in to Ukraine. NATO poked the bear with Ukraine and again Putin responded as he stated he would. Like him or not, he keeps his word.

In doing so Putin is merely practicing what these united States would be doing by kicking hostile actors out of Mexico or Cuba (wink), thus following the long established Monroe Doctrine. This would all be in keeping with old fashioned real politick. In this template Putin’s actions would find a sympathetic ear from many Biblical Christians in the West who see the West as the current incarnation of New World Order evil and who are hopeful that Putin might be a world leader who might be counted on to oppose the designs of the Great Reset of the NWO. This understanding  sees Eastern Ukraine east of the Dnipro river as being largely Russian in terms of population and so lies in Mother Russia’s orbit.  As such Putin has every right to protect his people against the designs of the Globalist West.

Template #2

Vladimir Putin is a puppet of the New World Order schema. Remember that in order for the Great Reset to go forward the US has to be weakened and leveled so that it can be a satellite of the NWO. In this schema Putin’s actions (as possibly combined with China in a seizure of Taiwan) have the effect of weakening the US thus leveling it so as to fit it in a NWO globalist schema. From a NWO perspective conflict here also has the advantage of continuing to reduce the white global population as white Russians and white Ukrainians kill one another in conflict. This template finds anything that weakens the US as a global power as well as reducing the percentage of white people on the planet to be desirous so that a NWO can more easily arise. In this scenario Putin and Biden are doing the devil’s work. (This scheme finds Biden also being a puppet of the NWO.)

A Word From Eugene Genovese On The Irrationality of Academia

“Today we face the dangerous irrationality of a self-styled postmodernism. It is more dangerous than the pretense of ethical neutrality in social science and historical scholarship because, despite all pretense, it quickly passes into nihilism. Normally, cynicism and fanaticism combat each other and represent, as it were, opposing heresies. Yet, marvelous today, they now march in lockstep. we are being told that since objectivity rests only with a God who does not exist, we should scorn it as the ideology of the oppressors.
 
 

Those who denounce objectivity as a fraud in the service of oppression are offering flagrant mendacity as a Higher Law. And since just about everyone, except non-Hispanic, heterosexual, white males, is today a victim of oppression, we are invited to present our subjectivity — our ‘feelings,’ which usually appear as hatreds — as a substitute for a non-existent truth. I make no apology for the harshness of these remarks. In accordance with the fashion of parading one’s feelings as a contribution to every discussion of every subject, I shall admit to being outraged at hearing endless whines about oppression from American intellectuals — black as well as white, female as well as male. For since they (we) rank among the top one or two percent of the world’s most privileged people, the whines, may fairly be judged as obscene. But then, I suppose, I am merely revealing my own status as an oppressor by invoking an untenable standard of statistical objectivity, when I should be demonstrating my sensitivity to the precious feeling of the insulted and injured. Unfortunately, never having met a human being who did not feel insulted and injured in this vale of tears, my capacity for compassion has been badly stunted. Atheist that I am, I learned that much from Christian teaching on original sin and human depravity, which has been confirmed by all historical experience of which I am aware, even if it is no longer in fashion in mainstream Christian churches.”

Eugene Genovese
The Southern Front; History and Politics in the Culture War

 

New World Order Monism

“The plan was this:  ‘Let us make a name’ (Gen. 11:4), or, a ‘shem’ meaning let us define ourselves, fix and establish our authority so that we are what we declare ourselves to be. Instead of being defined by the image of God (Gen. 1:26-28), man now held that he would be his own creature and creation and would define himself. If man becomes a self-definer, he, then, like a god, names or defines himself. If man becomes a self-definer, he, then, like a god, names or defines everything else. He can then define God, or define Him out of existence, supposedly.

The reason for this resolve was, ‘lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth’ (Gen. 11:4). A basic doctrine of theology is the unity of the Godhead. No god can be truly a god if he is divided within himself. Every humanistic attempt to replace God with a one-world humanistic order leads to efforts to bring all mankind under a common civil government.  This is a theological necessity: the ultimate power cannot be a divided power. Every effort is made to compel human unity in the name of the new faith.”

R. J. Rushdoony 
Genesis — p. 110

1.) When man redefine God or defines him out of existence the inevitable result is the maxim, “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Man apart from God will always build community-order systems that will be define as tyrannical. Men apart from the God of the Bible — whether husbands tyrannizing wives, parents tyrannizing children, teachers tyrannizing students, magistrates tyrannizing citizenry — will always exercise their non God ordained power as usurper and tyrants. Always. It may take time to go from bad to worse but it is inevitable.

2.) The humanistic attempt to replace God with a one-world order leads not only to the efforts we are now seeing to bring all mankind under a common civil government. Such humanistic attempts also seek to bring all mankind under a commonality that includes a universal shared faith, a universal shared race/ethnicity, and a universal shared culture. A unipolar world with a unipolar government (common civil government) cannot successfully exist apart from a unipolar faith, unipolar race/ethnicity and unipolar culture. Even our “new” multiplicity of gender is in service of creating a unipolar gender where the former hard bipolar distinctions of male and female disappear.

3.) Man without God thus seeks a uniformitarian existence where all distinctions are bled out of life. Man becomes Borg. He is a cog in the humanistic globalist machine. He is a worker bee in a hive. Humanist NWO learns that resistance is futile. He will be assimilated.

4.) Since the Endarkenment we have seen this attempt at the commodification of men into a uniform product. During the French Revolution all titles distinguishing rank were lost and everybody addressed one another as “Citoyen.” The Phrygian cap worn by all Revolutionaries — male or female — was the fashion expression that communicated the uniformitarian oneness. In the Revolution of 1918 in Russia it was the universal address of “comrade” that bespoke fallen man’s self-understanding that he shared in the oneness of the humanistic godhood. In 1949 forward in the Chinese Revolution it was the Mao suit that was the fashion statement that communicated that ultimate power cannot be a divided power.

Man without God creates a social-order monism that is an attempt to create a immanent uniformitarian and humanist godhood. We are seeing it everywhere around us.

Wilson on R. J. Rushdoony … Wilson as Wm. F. Buckley

“The basic argument of the book is that Christian Reconstructionism isn’t dead. It has been renewed. It has been simplified. A lot of the rough edges have been removed. A lot of the really controversial claims of the first generation have been either downplayed or denied and as Doug Wilson put it in an interview I did with him; ‘What is being so successful now in North Idaho is not so much Christian Reconstruction 2.0 but Christian Reconstruction 0.5.'”

Gathered from Canon Calls Interview with Crawford Gribben
Author — Survival and Resistance in Evangelical America; Christian Reconstruction in the Pacific Northwest

Canon Calls: Christian Reconstruction in the Pacific Northwest / Crawford Gribben on Apple Podcasts

This makes a point that I’ve been screaming about for some time. Wilson, in his usual attempted clever fashion, admits that he is not advancing Rushdoony. Wilson admits that he has watered down Rushdoony and sanded off the supposed rough edges so as to make Christian Reconstruction more palatable.

But more palatable to whom? What other answer can there be to that but to say that Wilson has made it more palatable to the left. Those on the right side of the left who would never have embraced Rushdoony have been gathered in by Wilson’s watered down version. If Wilson is Rushdoony 0.5 it means he is closer to Mitt Romney than he is to Rush.

The way that I’ve tried to say this in the past is that Wilson is not on the right but rather Wilson is on the right side of the Left.

By reducing the potency of Christian Reconstructionism to 0.5 Wilson is offering up an unstable product. The only way Reconstructionism’s potency could be cut is by denying the anti-thesis and by adding elements foreign to the original expression.

If Wilson is successful in his Rushdoony 0.5 pursuit he will have done for the Christian church what William F. Buckley did for the conservative movement. Wilson, like Buckley, will have successfully locked out that expression of Christianity that the Church most desperately needs in order to foment Reformation. Just as Buckley tamed conservatism by his work of being the gatekeeper of what he thought constituted safe conservatism so Wilson is taming the Church by his work of being gatekeeper of what he thinks is safe Christianity.

Is Alienism Christianity or is Alienism Marxism?

There is a movement afoot in some “Christian” quarters to suggest that the Postmillenialism requires us to see that God builds His Kingdom by the elimination of ethnic and national distinctions. Personally, I see such “thinking” as a kind of Baptized Cultural Marxism, since it is likewise the goal of the Cultural Marxists to eliminate the idea of distinct ethnicity and / or national identity. This can be seen by examining just a few of the words from the Cultural Marxists and their ideological forebears,

“Princes and nations will disappear without violence from the earth, the human race will become one family and the world the abode of reasonable men.”

-Adam Weishaupt, quoted in Paul Johnson, Intellectuals (London: Orion Books Limited, 1993), p. 32.

Capitalism developed the ever more inhuman polarization of the sexes. The cult of making distinctions, which serves only for oppression, is now being swept away by awareness of resemblance and identity.

M. Walser
Uber die neusten Stimmungen im Westen
In: Kursbuch, Bd. 20, 1970, S. 19-41.

”What will be the attitude of communism to existing nationalities?

The nationalities of the peoples associating themselves in accordance with the principle of community will be compelled to mingle with each other as a result of this association and hereby to dissolve themselves, just as the various estate and class distinctions must disappear through the abolition of their basis, private property.”

~ Frederick Engels in “The Principles of Communism”, 1847

“The equality of races and nations is one of the most important elements of the moral strength and might of the Soviet state. Soviet anthropology develops the one correct concept, that all the races of mankind are biologically equal. The genuinely materialist conception of the origin of man and of races serves the struggle against racism, against all idealist, mystic conceptions of man, his past, present and future.”

—Mikhail Nesturkh, Soviet anthropologist, 1959
“The Origin of Man” (Moscow)Mikhail Nesturkh, Soviet anthropologist, 1959:

This from Igor Shafareivich’s “Socialist Phenomenon”

“But with almost perverse consistency, most of the projections of Marxism have been proven incorrect. A better percentage of correct predictions could probably have by making random guesses…. we limit ourselves to three (examples) in order to underscore the typical and in most cases fundamental nature of the errors: the truth proved to be not merely different but in fact the opposite to that which had been predicted.

a.) The national question:

‘National differences and antagonistic interests among various peoples are already vanishing more and more and more thanks to the development of the bourgeoisie, to freedom of commerce, to the world market, to uniformity in the mode of production and in the corresponding conditions of life. The supremacy of the proletariat will accelerate the disappearances of differences.’”

However, the Biblical view of race, ethnicity, and national identity is far different than what is offered by the Cultural Marxists and those Alienist “Christians” who are trying to Baptize the elimination of ethnic markers by embracing the Marxist anthropology “that the genuinely materialist conception of the origin of man and of races is that all the races of mankind are biologically equal.” And of course, in the Marxist world and life view “biologically equal” means mere component parts that can be used interchangeably in the great machine culture that Marxists always turn society into.

“Biologically equal,” for these people means that there is no God ordained differences between the families of men.

In the quotes below we see a different vision than that given by the Alienists in our midst.

“Now the predicates of the covenant are applied in Isa. 19 to the Gentiles of the future, — “Egypt my people, and Assyria, the work of my hands, and Israel, mine inheritance,” Egypt, the people of “Jehovah of hosts,” (Isa. 19:25) is therefore also expected to live up to the covenant obligations, implied for Jehovah’s people. And Assyria comes under similar obligations and privileges. These nations are representative of the great Gentile world, to which the covenant privileges will therefore be extended.”

Martin J. Wyngaarden, The Future of the Kingdom in Prophecy and Fulfillment: A Study of the Scope of “Spiritualization” in Scripture (Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 2011), p. 94.

“More than a dozen excellent commentaries could be mentioned that all interpret Israel as thus inclusive of Jew and Gentile, in this verse, — the Gentile adherents thus being merged with the covenant people of Israel, though each nationality remains distinct.”

“This abiding distinction of the nationalities is also clearly implied by Isaiah. For, though Israel is frequently called Jehovah’s People, the work of his hands, his inheritance, yet these three epithets severally are applied not only to Israel, but also to Assyria and to Egypt: “Blessed be Egypt, my people, and Assyria, the work of my hands, and Israel, mine inheritance (Isaiah 19:25.)”

Thus the highest description of Jehovah’s covenant people is applied to Egypt, — “my people,” — showing that the Gentiles will share the covenant blessings, not less than Israel. Yet the several nationalities are here kept distinct, even when Gentiles share, in the covenant blessing, on a level of equality with Israel. Egypt, Assyria and Israel are not nationally merged. And the same principles, that nationalities are not obliterated, by membership in the covenant, applies, of course, also in the New Testament dispensation.”

Wyngaarden, pp. 101-102.

What the Alienist Christians are missing in their lurch towards amalgamation is that they are in bed with some strange bedfellows. Here is another person they with whom they are sleeping,

“National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism.”

Papa Joe Stalin

Hostility towards the validity of national and ethnic identity tend to rise at various times when it is useful to those in power or as part of political strategy. Such was the straitjacket imposed on thought by Soviet socialism that nationality was understood as “a social construct” that could easily be de-constructed. As Solzhenitsyn observes in his frank way:

“Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed—nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity—too bad for you.”

Many of the Christian Alienists are living in Solzhenitsyn’s pre-camp reality. Like the pre-Gulag Solzhenitsyn the Alienist Christians, invoking Christianity as their proof, have embraced universal humanity. They do not yet realize that what they are invoking in their advocacy of the erosion of nations for the sake of Christ, in the words of Alexander Solzhenitsyn, “will sooner lead to the entropy of the soul… not the unification of humanity.”