Uncategorized – Page 99

Michigan Gov. Whitmer says to Michigan Peasant Class; “Rules for Thee, but not for Me.”

I.) Michigan’s governor, Gretchen Whitmer, came under fire in May/2020 as allegations popped up that her own husband had been trying to flout her strict COVID shutdown rule by cutting in line to launch his boat in Northern Michigan. Whitmer’s husband apparently forgot Whitmer’s request to Michiganians “not to descend on to the waterfront in crowds over the weekend.”

When Gov. Whitmer found out about her husband’s actions she said,

“I wish it wouldn’t have happened, And that’s all we really have to say about it.”

II.) Last month, it was revealed Whitmer took an out-of-state trip in March to Florida, while at the same time urging people to stay home, as COVID-19 cases surged in the state. She had missed her Daddy and wanted to spend some Daddy-Daughter time. When asked about the inconsistency of telling Michiganders to stay at home while she galloped across the country Whitmer said,

“When a family member of mine needs a little help, though, I’m going to show up” even if I have to defy the orders I place on Michigan peasants.

III.) This weekend photographic evidence came to light of Michigan Gov. Whitmer violating her own Covid policies for the Citizens of Michigan as she was photographed yucking it up at a bar in Lansing Mich. with approximately 10 friends… all unmasked and all nearly sitting on top of one another. When queried about this action the Governor said… YET AGAIN…,

“I am human. I made a mistake, and I apologize.”

Coup Leader Biden’s War on WASP’s

Coup leader Joe Biden signed into law on Thursday a bill that is aimed at countering a rise in anti-Asian hate crimes during the coronavirus pandemic, saying the legislation is part of the nation’s first step toward unity.

“I believe, with every fiber of my being, that there are simple, core values and beliefs that should bring us together as Americans. One of them is standing together against hate, against racism — an ugly poison that has long haunted and plagued our nation.”

Joe Biden

Coup Leader

Do not miss what is going on in the quote above. Biden speaks of an ‘ugly poison that has long haunted and plagued our nation.” Now which people group has been around long enough to qualify as contenders for the trophy presented to those who have long haunted and plagued our nation with the ugly poison of racism? It sure as Hades isn’t the black man. Coup Leader Biden is never going to suggest that the black man is guilty of this ugly poison that has long haunted and plagued our nation. And you know that Ole Joe isn’t referring to the Hispanic or the Asian. Pacific Islanders? People from the Indian sub-continent? Intuits from Alaska?

No, Joe has in mind White Anglo-Saxon Christians when he talks about those who have perpetrated racism as “an ugly poison that has long haunted and plagued our nation.” In doing so Coup Leader Biden is reading right out of the Critical Race Theory handbook. White man guilty of being oppressors to the oppressed Asians… to the oppressed Hispanics … to the oppressed blacks. White man guilty for being Christian.

The Government, led by the man who led the 2020 coup is legislating against the majority people group of this nation. This ruling and legislating against the majority people group in America has become a common practice. Consistent with a policy that has been going on for quite some time, we learn from furious lawmakers in Tennessee that Biden has been shipping thousands of illegal aliens into their state using the overnight hours as cover to hide his actions. It seems that coup leader Biden has been flying and busing tens of thousands of illegals into these united States interior from his border facilities since February. He is dropping them off inside many of our cities and towns without notice or explanation.

One person who has been on top of this story for years now is Barbara Corcoran. You can find her website at refugeeresettlement.com She also has a small book that you can order and so learn what a scam the refugee resettlement program has become.

When you take just these two stories together,

1.) Biden covertly guilting of WASPs in signing Asian anti-racist legislation
2.) Biden using subversion to relocate illegals in the American heartland

and combine it with the reality that Executive Order 1395 was signed by Coup leader Biden serving to make equity mandated across the Federal Government what you find is that the Federal Government is now an agency that is doing all it can to enslave, marginalize, impoverish and even destroy the people group (White Anglo-Saxon Christians) who created this nation. Keep in mind that the political principle of equity in the Critical Race Theory lexicon is based upon the idea that white people can and should be legally discriminated against. Biden’s Executive Order 1395 means that white people can not be hired only because they are white. No other reason needed.

White people are under attack from our own Federal Government.

And when war is being waged upon you, you might consider waging war back.

Metaphorically speaking… of course.

Kinism Has Always Been Christian Orthodoxy 101

I have become convinced that one reason the modern Church hates Kinism is that it is everywhere in Scripture and in Church History. Indeed, Kinism up until 1950 or so in this country was stock in trade in the Church and followed the maxim of Vincent of Lérins inasmuch as that it has been believed everywhere, always, by all.

I am convinced this one reason why the modern Marxist church clutches at its ears and screams irrationally whenever someone stands up and says all neighbor love was never intended to be egalitarian. Below we find yet another example from a Bishop in the 17th Century Anglican Church in England.

Alienists Churchmen hate this stuff because like Poe’s “Tale of the Tell-tale heart,” they keep hearing the pounding of the heart of the Biblical Christianity that they think they have killed. However, every time someone makes a cogent case for Kinism, or every time someone demonstrates kinism from the scripture, or every time someone quotes from Church history the Alienist-Marxist goes even further mad hearing the pounding the tell-tale heart.

Enjoy the quote below from Bishop White Kennett;

“But secondly, the same Native Country is another cement of Christian Charity. It must be some instinct in Nature, because the consent of all Mankind to love their own Nation, to value their birthright and the inheritance of their Fathers. When Moses spied an Egyptian smiting a Hebrew one of his Brethren, i.e., his own countrymen; in his tenderness, he delivered the one, and out of too great indignation, he slew the other. And when he went a second time and saw two men of the Hebrews strive together, he said to him who began the assault, ‘Wherefore smitest thou thy fellow? Is he thy brother an Israelite? This may provoke God to make you longer slaves in a strange land.’ Our Blessed Savior seems to have had particular regard to the good estate of his own Nation, while he declared, that he was not sent, save to the ‘Lost Sheep of the House of Israel’; while he wept over Jerusalem, and often visited Nazareth and Bethlehem, tho one would think, nothing could draw him thither but an impulse of natural affection; for he himself was sensible that the ‘Prophet had least Honor in his own Country’. St. Paul was another great example of inbred Love and Zeal for his Native Land, the goodly Heritage of his Ancestors. He was by Birth a true old Hebrew of the Hebrews, i.e., for many generations. He had indeed but little reason to be fond of that Birthright; for he was brought into great Perils by his own countrymen, and he had least to do with them, for his Mission was to be an Apostle to the Gentiles; yet Nature must break through all discouragements; wherefore, Act xxviii.19 tho’ plagued and oppressed by his fellow Jews, he had still a loving eye upon his dear Country, ‘I was constrained (says he) to appeal unto Ceasar, not that I had ought to accuse my Nation of’; and how much less would he have betrayed his Nation? Nay, what a rapture of zeal had he, Rom ix.3 ‘I could wish myself accursed or separated from Christ for my Brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, who are Israelites.’”

Bishop White Kennet (1660-1728)
On Christian Charity — p. 20-21

Defending the Flock

Recently the oldest Law Student in America — Joel McDurmon — took out after a couple of people I love who are part of the congregation I serve. The chap who was fired by Ameican Vision for his SJW turn couldn’t resist a swipe at Arnold and Philip Jagt. The oldest Law Student in America wrote;

“Just a reminder of the racist nonsense you see in the reformed world still. The post (of McAtee) looks benign but view the comments. Mr. Jagt is Arnold Jagt’s son. We’ve posted similar racist comments from him in the past. Arnold runs pocketcollege.com and claims his views on race are no different than Rushdoony’s. The son seems to have imbibed the hate.

The Jagt family attend Mr. McAtee’s kinist church (he may use a different label). Not only do they support Peter Hammond’s views against miscegenation, they also don’t appear to think too highly of blacks in general, and apparently believe there is a black conspiracy to overthrow all whites.”

The Shepherd responds,

1.) McDurmon is a vile man filled with estrogen and bile. This attack on the Jagts is completely unwarranted. There is no “there” there in McDurmon’s accusation. Mr. Jagt’s son is no more racist than Joel is intelligent. Mr. Jagt’s son is an industrious young man who is a machinist of top-caliber ability and who loves Christ understanding that he, like all God’s people, is a sinner saved by grace alone. Excepting my own Son there are very few young men who I would trust more than Arnold Jagt’s sons. They are budding men of God and it riles me to see this serpent in the Church take a whack at them.

2.) Joel completely misses the irony found in the hatred that is required in order to accuse someone of hate … and that with zero evidence.

3.) We must admit that in Joel’s Christ-hating worldview I am a racist … as are the Jagts … as are every biblical Christian that breathed prior to 1950 or so. In light of the publication of Achord and Dow’s “Who is my Neighbor” it takes a determined effort to suggest that there is anything in the least racist or hateful in what Christ’s Church has embraced for 2000 years.

4.) In point of fact, it is Joel who is the racist. Joel hates white Christians who are not Marxists and loves him some minority Marxists.

5.) As we consider Arnold it needs to be shouted that Arnold is one of the most generous men that I know. I personally know of a mixed-race man and his family that Arnold has repeatedly generously gifted with financial help. Tell me … does that sound like the actions of a racist? But Joel doesn’t know this and so he just continues to parade his gargantuan ignorance.

McDurmon shows his non-Christian teeth when he bars them at Arnold and spits out accusations of “racism” against the man and frankly, this pisses me off to the point that did I believe that dueling was Biblical I’d be demanding pistols at ten paces.

6.) Joel probably doesn’t like the fact that his children’s great-grandfather is R. J. Rushdoony. I note this because it really is the case that the convictions of the Jagts on race correspond almost exactly to what Rushdoony believed and wrote. However, with Joel, the son-in-law nut doesn’t fall far from the Father-in-law nut tree.

A.) Joel accuses Arnold of racism
B.) Joel’s Father-in-law (North) accused his Father-in-law (Rushdoony) of racism

It simply is the case that the Jagt’s view on race (and mine as well) echo Rushdoony’s views. There are just tons of quotes from RJR that sustain this observation.

7.) The Church I serve is NOT a Kinist church except inasmuch as Kinism is consistent with Biblical Christianity. The Church I serve is Christ’s Church.

8.) The Jagts and I don’t support Marxists of any stripe or color. That makes us haters in the book of the oldest law student in America.

9.) Peter Hammond is likewise a man of God doing all he can do to save the West from the Marxist like Mcdurmon.

10.) A black conspiracy to overthrow all Christian whites? Probably not. However, there clearly is a global conspiracy to overthrow all Christian whites. I’ll let others figure out what the source is.

11.) If you read the thread in question you’ll notice that Joel practices the point, splutter, and scream “Eek” argumentation methodology. Joel tries to cut somebody so that there is blood in the water that his useful idiot co-laborers can then come and have a shark-fest.

12.) The greatest irony of this whole thread is that someone later says that the Jagts can’t help their racism since their Dutch and as we know all Dutch are racist haters.

It is not only blacks that this family views as lower than them, but all non-Dutch people are a couple of notches below the Dutch people. The Jagts are not only Dutch, they are Dutch on steroids. They get the Kinism of both sides of the Atlantic, and the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. This is a strange family.

LOL.. you can’t make this level of stupid unconsciousness up.

Charlotte Christ the King Church, because of God’s incredible grace, is one of the greatest Churches remaining in America and the Jagts are, along with everyone else in the congregation, part of the reason why.

Joel McDurmon can kiss my Kinist arse.

Identifying Liberal non-Christianity

Protestant liberal thought in its most traditional incarnations emphasized

1.) The universal Fatherhood of God

God is not a Judge to any man. God loves all men indiscriminately. All men have a Democratic claim upon God. There is no eternal distinction between elect and reprobate.

2.) The universal brotherhood of man

Men are all brothers. This means when the implications are teased out that all men are heaven-bound since all men have God has Father and are Brothers.

3.) The infinite value of the human soul

Souls are so infinitely valuable that God would never cast one into hell. Souls are so infinitely valuable that Capital punishment is always wrong. Liberals often believe that they can rescue any soul from a wayward path by re-education.

4.) The example of Jesus

All talk is about the moral example of Jesus that men are to follow. This cunningly leaves out any talk about the juridical and propitiatory work of Jesus Christ on the Cross as the only hope for men’s acceptability with God. One is saved by following Jesus’ example. One is not saved by the Cross work of Jesus Christ. Liberals talk a great deal of “walking in Christ’s steps,” and very little of the necessity of Christ’s death to be right with God.

5.) The establishment of the moral-ethical Kingdom of God on Earth.

In Christian eschatology, God brought in the Kingdom and is bringing in the Kingdom by the finished work of Jesus Christ and the empowerment of the Holy Spirit upon the Saints to live out Christ in all of Redeemed men’s callings consistent with the Revelation of Scripture. In Christian Humanist Liberal eschatology man, quite apart from the work of the Spirit and the instruction of Scripture brings in the Kingdom in keeping with his autonomous sense of oughtness. This means that any Kingdom the Liberal successfully brings in is an anti-Christ humanist Kingdom. The Liberal Kingdom of God has often been relativistic, pluralistic, and non-doctrinal.

6.) Ethics over doctrine and experience over Scriptural authority.

Schleiermacher, one of the chief theological mavens of Liberalism emphasized that the essence of Christian faith is a state of mind called ‘the feeling of absolute dependence’ This absolute dependence was not arrived at by learning the Scriptures and so knowing God but rather this feeling of absolute dependence was an intuitively arrived at immediate self-consciousness of being in relation with God.

7.) Liberal Christian scholars embraced and encouraged the higher biblical criticism of modern Biblical scholarship with its inherent anti-supernatural presuppositions.

You can sniff out a Liberal by being very pointed with questions put to them on the Supernatural. Don’t let them fool you with their poetic and contradictory language. Ask them directly …”Did Jesus Christ who was dead and buried bodily arise alive again from the grave so that post-resurrection photographs of Him with His disciples could be taken?