An Example of the WOKE Reformed Clergy … McAtee contra Barnes

Below is an example of something I posted earlier today. This post was intended as satire to the end of mocking the WOKE crowd. Instead I heard the screams of Rev. Doug Barnes taking exception. It seems that Doug took it not as satire but as another piece of proof of how racist I am.

First is my initial post and then Doug’s repsonse. Following that I will post my response to the good Rev. Barnes;

Bret’s initial post

You know you’re talking to a White Supremacist when you learn that

1.) They are employed full time
2.) They talk about books they’ve read
3.) They paid off their student loans
4.) They have a professional or technical degree
5.) They regularly attend a non-Pentecostal church
6.) They drive with paid up auto-insurance
7.) They have superior credit rating
8.) They’ve never been finger-printed by the Police
9.) They distrust the Government

10.) They remain married after 20 years and their children reflect all the previous

Now clearly, this is all spoken as if it might be posted by someone who is full on WOKE. Therein lies the satire. Personally, I believe everything above is normative. However, in 2002 the Smithsonian Museum told us that these kind of traits were examples of White privilege, White Supremacism, and systemic racism. Everyone (except maybe Doug) laughed then. I figured it would be another laugh for folks.

But Doug charged in to come to the defense of Jesus thinking I was attacking his Jesus.

Rev. Barnes writes,

Hmm … every one of those things is true of me and many of my peers who do _NOT_ embrace the heresy of white supremacism/kinism. Seems to be a flaw in your identification system. Here’s a helpful addendum:

You might be a White Supremacist if:

— You think some people are inherently inferior just because they come from a different branch of Noah’s family.

— You believe the dividing line of race is a legitimate way of predicting intelligence or morality.

— You see no irony in making such claims while claiming to serve the God who commands His followers to be humble servants of all men, thinking little of themselves (1 Pet. 5:6; Mark 9:35; Mark 10:42-45; Luke 14:10-11).

Some excellent passages to consider, over against the proud exaltation of those who are set apart merely by the shade of their skin and the (relatively recent) origin of their ancestors would include: James 4:6; Prov. 3:34; Isa. 2:11-17; Matt. 23:12. Go ahead — look them up, and let them evaluate your heart. OR … harden your conscience by condemning the messenger who brings God’s Word against the pride with which you exalt yourself.

Your choice.

Bret L. McAtee replied to my misdirected fellow member of the clergy,

#1 — does not apply to me — just ask all my Kinist friends who are also not white

#2 — See Charles Murray’s “The Bell Curve.”

#3 — Why Doug, are you claiming to be proud of your humility?

You keep on citing those passages. I do not think those passages mean what you think they mean in the context of this conversation. Unless of course you think that being humble means taking Christianity as a real life death cult.

I’m not sure what you have against the 10 listed above as they are merely what we would expect Biblical Christians to pursue. Or maybe your beef is with just Biblical Christians in general.

Here are some passages you can meditate upon or you can continue to kick against the pricks.

Romans 9:3, I Timothy 5:8, Revelation 21:24, Acts 17:26 (don’t stop half way).

(Oh .. and by the by … those lists were intended to be jokes at the expense of the WOKE crowd. Interesting that you took exception. I wonder what that says about you?)

Listen to Calvin Seminary Professor Martin Wyngaarden from the 1960’s on Isaiah 19 thus suggesting that it is you Doug who are jeopardizing the faith once and forever delivered unto the saints;

Now the predicates of the covenant are applied in Isa. 19 to the Gentiles of the future, — “Egypt my people, and Assyria, the work of my hands, and Israel, mine inheritance,” Egypt, the people of “Jehovah of hosts,” (Isa. 19:25) is therefore also expected to live up to the covenant obligations, implied for Jehovah’s people. And Assyria comes under similar obligations and privileges. These nations are representative of the great Gentile world, to which the covenant privileges will therefore be extended.”

Martin J. Wyngaarden, The Future of the Kingdom in Prophecy and Fulfillment: A Study of the Scope of “Spiritualization” in Scripture (Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 2011), p. 94.

 

“More than a dozen excellent commentaries could be mentioned that all interpret Israel as thus inclusive of Jew and Gentile, in this verse, — the Gentile adherents thus being merged with the covenant people of Israel, THOUGH EACH REMAINS NATIONALLY DISTINCT.”

“For, though Israel is frequently called Jehovah’s People, the work of his hands, his inheritance, yet these three epithets severally are applied not only to Israel, but also to Assyria and to Egypt: “Blessed be Egypt, my people, and Assyria, the work of my hands, and Israel, mine inheritance.” 19:25.

Thus the highest description of Jehovah’s covenant people is applied to Egypt, — “my people,” — showing that the Gentiles will share the covenant blessings, not less than Israel. YET the several nationalities are here kept distinct, even when Gentiles share, in the covenant blessing, on a level of equality with Israel. Egypt, Assyria and Israel are not nationally merged. And the same principles, that nationalities are not obliterated, by membership in the covenant, applies, of course, also in the New Testament dispensation.”

Wyngaarden, pp. 101-102.

Careful Doug how deep you want to go down this rabbit hole. The theologians from Reformed Church history support me and I have a gazillion of their quotes at my fingertips.

Look, Doug, I know you are being earnest and somewhere in your chest there is the conviction that you need to rescue Christianity from my “racist” claws.

Indeed, I do not doubt that you are concerned for my eternal soul. Just as I am for yours and the people sitting under your misdirected ministry.

Doug replied

Bret, I’m not trying to convert you. Just trying to prick the conscience of those listening to your racist folly.

 Bret rounded off the conversation;

Doug, It’s all good. I’m trying to do the same with all those listening to your Cultural Marxist folly.

Is the Great Replacement a Conspiracy Theory?

Recently, the Cultural Marxist Lugenpresse with their Corporate Political allies have been breathless in their ravings about the dangers of the “extreme right and their Great Replacement conspiracy theory.” They go on about this as if they themselves have not openly spoken of their desire to see the White man replaced.

Yet, it indeed has been the case that in the highest halls of power we have heard this desire for a Great Replacement articulated. Here are but two examples;

“This will arguably be the third great revolution in America . . . to prove that we literally can live without in effect having a dominant European culture. We want to become a multiracial, multiethnic society. We’re not going to disintegrate in the face of it.”

President Bill Clinton

1997 Boston Speech

“I’m proud of the American record on culture and economic integration of not only our Muslim communities but African communities, Asian communities, Hispanic communities,  and the wave still continues. It’s not going to stop. Nor should we want it to stop. As a matter of fact, it’s one of the things I think we can be most proud of. Folks like me who are Caucasian of European descent — for the first time in 2017 we’ll be an absolute minority in the United States of America. Absolutely minority. Fewer than 50 percent of the people in America, from then and on, will be white European stock. That’s not a bad thing. That’s a source of our strength.”

Vice-President Joe Bite-Me
2017 Conference Comments

Clearly, if the Great Replacement Theory is a conspiracy it is a open conspiracy. The fact that the Cultural Marxist left can hyperventilate about “The Great Replacement conspiracy,” can only be accounted by the fact that they are counting on the usual hebetude of their viewership.

Indeed, one could easily argue that Great Replacement is at the core of the designs of the NWO and the Great Reset. We see replacement everywhere. Everything distinct is being replaced by everything non-distinct so that the result is a interchangeable cog culture. Distinct races are being replaced by the mulatto and the mélange. Distinct genders are being replaced by the hybrid and the sexual amalgam. Distinct ages, if the pedophiles could have their way, would be replaced by the ageless child pursued for the purpose of bedding.  Distinct cultures are being replaced by the NWO uni-culture. Distinct faiths are being replaced by some retarded version of Bahaism and/or “can’t we all just get along-ism.” Instead of the idea of Great Replacement being a conspiracy theory it is the theme of our epoch and only disingenuous fools with an agenda want to tell you otherwise.

The saddest thing about all of this is that the “conservative” Christian church is leading the way in support of the Great Replacement. Whether by championing the browning of America by its refusal to listen, learn and speak out against our Replacement, or by insisting that if people really love them some Jesus then they will embrace the fact that it is a sin to prefer to worship with people who share a common race, ethnicity, and faith as if Jesus hates it when His worshipers have those matters in common. None of this is to say that it is a sin for a congregation to be multi-racial and/or multi-cultural so long as it is preaching the faith once and forever delivered to the saints. It is only to say it is not sin for a congregation to be uni-racial and uni-cultural as long as it understands that the Kingdom of God is made up of people from every tribe, tongue, and nation in their tribes, tongues, and nations. The “conservative” Christian church is doing more than any other American institution to advance the agenda of the Great Replacement.

In all this we must keep center before our minds that the greatest loss in the continued pursuit of the “Great Replacement” is not the loss of our genetic inheritance, as great a loss as that would be. No, the greatest loss were the Great Replacement to succeed would be the loss of Biblical Christianity for a untold number of generations. It is Biblical Christianity after all that the cultural Marxist proletariat most hate — pulling down the house of the White Man is just the means to that ultimate end.

Thomas Jefferson … A Deist More Righteous Than Your R2K “Minister”

A long time ago, a government enacted a law that fined citizens for “breaking the Sabbath,” and it used language for exceptions (“work of necessity or charity”) echoing Westminster Shorter Catechism Q&A 60 (“works of necessity and mercy”).

“A Bill for Punishing Disturbers of Religious Worship and Sabbath Breakers”—”If any person on Sunday shall himself be found labouring at his own or any other trade or calling, or shall employ his apprentices, servants or slaves in labour, or other business, except it be in the ordinary houshold offices of daily necessity, or other work of necessity or charity, he shall forfeit the sum of ten shillings for every such offence.”

This was surely authored by 17th-century Puritans, right?

Nope. It was the 1786 Virginia legislature, and the bill’s author was Thomas Jefferson—that Unitarian Founding Father the Supreme Court likes to appeal to for striking down such religious laws. Keep in mind that this is the same Thomas Jefferson who in the election of 1800 was pilloried and vilified by the New England clergy who warned during that election cycle that if elected Jefferson would seize people’s bibles. Keep in mind that this is the same Thomas Jefferson who gave us “the Jefferson Bible.” This bible found old Tom cutting out every supernatural account. Keep in mind that TJ was a Unitarian at best and a raving Deist at worst. Then after you keep all that in mind, remember that Thomas Jefferson acted more biblically than your R2K minister.

Now keep in mind here that your local R2K minister insists that the kind of political action that finds legislators passing laws that are born of the Christian faith is a great sin. Legislators, per R2K, are to appeal to Natural law and not Biblical law for their attempted legislating. Can you imagine the heart attack that R2K political super-hero Sen. Ben Sasse would have over this proposed legislation?

“The Great Replacement Theory”

Called “The Great Replacement Theory,” as birthed in Halls of power
It would cover the globe in color, while the Caucasian is devoured
Created in conjunction with the honored and inspired shibboleth
That all those who hate wisdom, have a preoccupation with death

The Great Replacement theory was conceived by Mephistopheles
And delivered to his Illuminati — his somewhat mortal corporate Trustees
It was they who were charged, with creating an expanding global plan
To mix the breeds together so as to create one New World Order Man

And so the high and mighty, those counted exalted throughout the land
Gathered in their covens, to reap a black harvest concocted by black hands
There gathered was Kalergi’s shade, an inspiration to all the rest
There gathered Red-Shields, Rockefellers, and their demon minions of the West

They resolved to put the European down, to cast the white man into Hell
The only question pondered upon was “which was the appropriate spell?
Was it better to create Caucasian wars where white men would be erased?
Or was it better to spread pestilence, and famine for destruction of the race?

Better still they discerned, to kill the European slowly and incrementally expunge
We will open his borders ever wider to the alien while his birthrates steadily plunge
We will drive him into final extinction by his pursuit of erotimania sexual joy
We will work it drip by drip so that he can not distinguish between a girl and a boy

And then in the fullness of time when the European finally decides a child to conceive
We will fill her head with a preference for a marriage bed with a Tanzanian or Japanese
We will convince him that a desire for children that favor him in deportment and appearing
Is really the fruit of a desire for incest, and so a horrid and malevolent kind of queering

This Mephistopheles band of Illuminati who designed the Great Replacement theory
Included a spike in sodomy and pedo to answer “how to replace the white man query”
For good measure they included ginning up the White man’s loathing and his hate
For all his forebears achievement and all the Christian faith that made his fathers great

And so was pursued the project of the Great Replacement task by the Illuminati gay
The project to eclipse the Christian European White man into coffee colored latte
The project to forever wipe out Christendom in favor of Mephistopheles as Lord
The project to swallow the Christian European White man in the swelling pagan hordes

Darren Doane Caught Gaslighting

“I would argue to want you see yourself reproduced is incest.”

Darren Doane
Doane is the Director of “Collision”–the movie about Hitchens and Wilson

1.) Jesus Christ is said to be the express image of God (Hebrews 1:3). Is there something incestuous about the Trinity Darren?

2.) So, by that reasoning our being transformed into the image of Christ has the smell of incest about it?

But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord.      II Corinthians 3:18

For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. 

Romans 8:29-30

3.) God created man in His own Image and set man in the Garden. God therefore is an incest monger by Doane’s “reasoning.”

“We don’t wish to reproduce carbon copies. We wait in anticipation to see what the Creator has fashioned. Otherwise we are backwoods, as some seem to be, looking to produce pure breeds within their line and ending up with sickly incestuous dogs only good at sniffing for birds. We ought not to want to reproduce a skin color but a godly line.”

Darren Doane

Director of Documentary on Wilson & Hitchens

1.) Unless Doane thinks there are people out there who want to reproduce with their mother or sisters he is giving us a red-herring to talk about anybody desiring to reproduce carbon copies.

2.) We are backwoods for wanting to enter into marriage and so reproduce with people who share our race, ethnicity, faith, culture, as well as many commonalities as possible? It is wisdom to contract marriage with someone who has virtually nothing in common with you?

3.) Personally, I’ve never met any blue blood royalties or Appalachian “cousins” who alone could possibly be accused of inbred. Another Doane red-herring. Does Doane really believe that the counsel to “marry within your race” is a case of “inbred?” What a Maroon.

4.) False dichotomy as preferring Godly lines over skin color. One can do both at the same time. Where are all the Godly lines that are coffee latte (remember we are looking for generation upon generation here) Mr. Doane?
Can you imagine the level of absolute lunacy it takes to say something like Doane is saying.

I swear … the disintegration downward into the stupidity void is accelerating exponentially.