Comrade Contraceptive

The big news item this week was King Obama going all dictatorial against “freedom of religion,” as seen in the contraceptive kerfuffle. Comrade Obama and his Commissar Sebelius finally decided, in an example of their infinite royal mercy and condescension to the masses, to relent in their requirement that all Religious institutions would be required to provide free of charge contraception to female employees. The new policy, which has been royally proclaimed from on high, is that the women employed by religious institutions will still receive free contraceptions to protect His Highness’ royal wombs, BUT instead of His Highness’ religious institutions paying for His contraceptions for His Highness’ female citizenry, His Higness’ insurance companies will foot the bill.

What people seem to be missing in this equation is that if religious organizations will be exempted from being required to give contraception to their employees but the insurance companies of those religious organizations will instead be required to pony up to provide those “services,” that simply means that the religious companies will still be providing these “services” as they end up paying more for their premiums in order to get insurance programs that exclude them from not paying for contraceptives. You see, when one lives in an arrangement where the Comrade State owns everything and everybody then playing these kind of shell games are easy to get away with. No sense to upset the Comrade religious institutions when we can get them to compromise their “scruples” by having them pay for contraceptives by pretending that the Comrade insurance companies are the ones paying.

This past week was kabuki theater at its best. Comrade Obama declares from on high that the Comrade State will require birth control contraceptives be given free of charge and the Commissar journalists spread the news. Comrade representatives of the religious institutions strut about and squeal squeal squeal thus pleasing the Comrade rank and file. Comrade Obama grants an accommodation that doesn’t change anything with the result the Comrade Obama is seen as Barack the merciful, and the Comrade Journalists are seen as ever vigilante, and the Comrade representatives of the religious institutions get to tell themselves that they are relevant.

Meanwhile Comrade Planned Parenthood make out like bandits and the Comrade State goes unscathed.

Quotes That Will Trouble “The Escondido R2K ‘Theology’” Crowd — #2

‎”We therefore conclude that the civil government, as soon as it discovers abominable heresies by which the glory of Christ is diminished and the salvation of souls prevented, is in duty bound, yea that it has the office, to wield the sword and to exercise its full authority against those errors which bring divisions among the people and other great calamities, as we have experienced more than once. And if the teachers of false doctrines will not be convinced of their error, nor desist from their preaching, let the government use its power and compel them to refrain from their mischievous work, so that the true doctrine, and the proper worship of God, may be retained pure and unadulterated, that peace and harmony may prevail.”

Martin Luther

‎”There are two governments: the one religious, by which the conscience is trained to piety and divine worship; the other civil, by which the individual is instructed in those duties which, as men and citizens, we are bound to perform”

John Calvin

This one thing I add more; that it is the duty of a christian magistrate, or at leastwise of a good householder, to compel to amendment the breakers and contemners of God’s sabbath and worship. The peers of Israel, and all the people of God, did stone to death (as the Lord commanded them) the man that disobediently did gather sticks on the sabbath-day [Numbers 15:32-6]. Why then should it not be lawful for a christian magistrate to punish by bodily imprisonment, by loss of goods, or by death, the despisers of religion, of the true and lawful worship of the sabbath-day? […] For it is a heinous sin and a detestable schism, if the congregation be assembled, either in cities or villages, for thee then to seek out byways to hide thyself, and not to come from there, but to contemn the church of God and assembly of saints: as the Anabaptists have taken an use to do.

Henry Bullinger, Fifty godly and learned sermons divided into the five decades containing the chief and principal points of Christian religion, ed. Thomas Harding (1849-52 Parker edn; 4 vols, Grand Rapids, 2004), i, 261-2.

Escondido, Radical Two Kingdom “Theology,” is a complete innovation. It is true that one can find the “Spiritual nature of the Church,” in Reformed Church history but the “Spiritual nature of the Church” and R2K are related the same way that a guppy and Godzilla are related.

Birth Control & State Control

It strikes me as an opportune time, in the context of B. Hussein Obama’s entrance into American’s private sex life, to examine the idea of birth control which has the whole nation atwitter.

Certainly, there are many people who realize the irony is a birth control agenda, the consequence of which, makes for a lack of self control. Birth control is a means of sex without consequences, or what has come to be known as “free love.” Birth control, especially for the unmarried, is a way to achieve, apart from self control, the gratifying pleasure of passion divorced from the necessary pledge of commitment and the glad fruit of union. In the words of G. K. Chesterton, birth control is a “name … by which it is possible to filch the pleasure belonging to a natural process while violently and unnaturally thwarting the process itself.” Birth control thus is to take that which is natural and make it unnatural.

Second, there is the irony in the phrase itself. Birth control? Conception control maybe. Conception prevention perhaps. Even conception destruction often. But Birth control? Birth control would be deciding whether or not to undergo water birth or home birth. Birth control is choosing which Obstetrics Doctor one chooses. Contraceptives during sex is birth control the same way that choosing between a Glock and a Smith and Wesson while shopping is gun control.

Next, as I’m reading about this whole B. Hussein Obama contraceptive imbroglio I am taken back to Huxley’s “Brave New World,” where the citizenry in the dystopian statist world engage with sex with one another in the casual way that we may wave at an acquaintance. In all my reading on this subject matter what is brought forth repeatedly is the truth that the casual sex fostered by divorcing sex from conception serves the interest of the totalitarian state as such casual sex is a direct assault on the family. “Free love,” engendered by contraceptive nirvana, breaks down family integrity, either by voiding the formation of family or by sundering the family due to illicit affairs, thus preventing the creation of families to challenge the interests of the state in favor of tribal or familial interests or by throwing broken families on the paternal care of the state. If the state is to steal sovereignty from the family and keep that stolen sovereignty for itself, the state must do all it can to enfeeble the family. State sponsored contraception is one way of doing that. It is kind of ironic that the result of state sponsored birth control is state population control.

Fourth, the contraceptive carnival serves the end of our egalitarian wonderland. Historically, the responsibility of raising children have turned young married men into mature protective men and has drawn out the natural mothering instinct from women. Contraception mutes those realities from being developed as young men opt for the playboy lifestyle well into their late 20’s and young ladies, even if having children, sublimate those mothering instincts due to a blizzard of hateful messages of all things feminine, in preference for a career and daycare for the children they migh have. On this point we turn to Chesterton again who could say with his usual wit, “it (birth control) is mixed up with a muddled idea that women are free when they serve their employers but slaves when they help their husbands.” Families with small numbers of children due to contraception can allow the pretense to continue that there is no such thing as distinctly male and female roles. Men and women are interchangeable parts that have no clearly identified unique mission. Egalitarianism is sustained.

Fifth, I think we need to realize that if birth control actually resulted in fewer abortions you can be sure that the Obama administration would not support state sponsored birth control. In the documentary, “The Monstrous Regiment of Women,” a former Abortion mill owner revealed that she pushed birth control for young women because she had the data that proved that an increase of birth control contraceptives opportunities for young women guaranteed an increase of abortions thus increasing the profit on her bottom line as the necessity of abortions would increase.

Finally, someone needs to point out again the grisly irony that finds the generation that legalized the most demonic form of birth control (abortion) will be the first generation upon which the practice of Senior Citizen control will be practiced. The socialized health care that was just passed in these united States is, in reality, an abortion provision for Senior Citizens. The children of the Roe vs. Wade generation that made it through alive are going to return the favor of “self-control” upon the generation that legalized birth control. However, don’t miss the fact that as it is the state pushing birth control at the beginning of life so it will be the state through their death panels which will be pushing senior citizen control. Seldom has the proverb, “what goes around comes around,” been so clearly seen to be true for those with eyes to see.

Ultimately, a society defined by contraceptives and “free love” is a society that will be controlled by the state in life and death.

Quotes That Will Trouble “The Escondido R2K Theology” Crowd — #1

‎”This argument has been harmoniously received and even become common in the opinions of the schools of orthodox theologians, which state that the magistrate ought to be the keeper of both Tables of the Law. Indeed, he is the keeper, to take care that the business he has been commissioned with is carried out in the same manner which the Lord has commanded him.”

Johannes Piscator

“Argument 4. What the Magistrate is fore-prophesied to be under the New Testament, that he must discharge with all the power God hath given him, and that perpetually, and not by the tie of a judicial and temporary law, which binds for a time only. But the Magistrate is fore-prophesied Isa. 49. 23. and 60. 10 Rev. 21. 26. to be a Nurse-father to the Church under the New Testament, to keep and guard both Tables of the Law, and to see that Pastors do their duty, to minister to the Church by his royal power, yea when the fountain shall be opened in David’s house, that is under the New Testament, he shall thrust through the false Prophet that speaketh lies in the Name of the Lord, Zach. 13. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.”

Samuel Rutherford

“But this is not arbitrary to him, for he is the minister of God, (Rom. 13:4) and the judgment is the Lord’s (Deut. 1:17; 2 Chron. 19:6). And if the Magistrate is keeper of both tables, he must keep them in such manner as God has delivered them to him.”

George Gillespie

“The Magistrate is not merely appointed by God as both the keeper and avenger of the second Table, but certainly also, and especially, of pure religion, with respect to which he keeps an external discipline.”

Philip Melanchthon

‎”Therefore, in regard to this very subject of which we here treat, since we have the clear word and command of God, by which magistrates are ordered to punish blasphemy. And in addition (as we demonstrated above) this is particularly the duty of the Magistrate, to take care that sins against the first Table are avenged”

Theodore Beza

Judaism’s Strange Gods — Entry #1

“Illustrations and reasons of the law of Moses I never take from the Talmud. The oral traditions of the ignorant rabbis …(give) not the sense of the Mosaic writings. Many of the laws of the Pentateuch would make a strange figure indeed, if we were to interpret them as the Pharisees did, whose exposition, according to Christ’s declaration, in many cases served to inculcate doctrines and precepts directly the reverse of what Moses had taught and commanded… even with regard to Jewish antiquities, prior to the Babylon captivity, the Talmud is … an impure source of information … a book … which appeals only to oral tradition can tell us nothing worthy of credit …”

Johann David Michaelis
Professor of Old Testament and Semitic languages
University of Gottingen
Commentaries on the Laws of Moses

There seems to be no end of books that one can access in order to develop an apologetic against some heresy or mutated form of Christianity. Books revealing the flim-flam man and occult background of Joseph Smith and Mormonism. Books revealing the lunacy of the Millerites and Ellen G. White and Jehovah Witnesses. Books exposing Islam, Hinduism, and Armstrongism. You can purchase handy dandy fold out pamphlets that list the ways in which the false religions are heretical. You can find the testimonials of former adherents of false religions writing on how they were saved out this or that heresy or apostasy. However, despite all this glut of information there is comparatively little in the publishing world exposing Judaism for the false religion it is, and this despite that the Christian Scriptures refer to the Jewish faith as a “Synagogue of Satan.”

Part of the reason for this is that with the advent of Dispensationalism, Zionist interests have co-opted and blunted the Christian faith’s witness against the evil worldview and faith system that Judaism is. Indeed, so infected is certain quarters of the Christian Church in the West with Judaism that some ministers teach that those who call themselves “Jewish” don’t need to be saved like other people. (I say, “call themselves ‘Jewish'” because of the large question of whether or not those who insist that they are racially Jewish are indeed racially Jewish. Arthur Koestler’s book, “The 13th Tribe” calls the Jewishness of Jews into serious question.)

Also, there is the reality that the Money Interest which is largely controlled by the elite class who some call “Jews,” likewise controls much of the publishing industry.

Indeed, things are so badly on this score that the West is often referred to as having a “Judeo-Christian” faith when in point of fact no such creature exists. To talk about the “Judeo-Christian” faith is like talking about a chaste whore or a Vampire who is allergic to blood. In brief, the idea of “Judeo-Christian” is a severe contradiction.

However, the lacuna of books and literature dealing with the unseemliness of the Jewish Faith as it contributes to a Christ hating worldview has begun to be filled by Michael Hoffman in his book, “Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit,” and it’s more accessible popular version, “Judaism’s Strange Gods.”

Hoffman’s books is dedicated to exposing Judaism for what it is, seeking to convince the reader that the Jewish faith is just another version of pagan humanism. Hoffman’s exposure of Judaism has him convinced that “this book may be banned, suppressed, and otherwise proscribed and forbidden because of the documentation it bring to light concerning the religion of Orthodox Judaism.”

Because of the unnatural fusion that has occurred between some expressions of Christianity and Judaism that was mentioned earlier Hoffman can only to hope his work can gain traction not only in the face of a hostile publishing industry but also in the face of a hostile Church. With the writing of this book Hoffman has armored up in the midst of those wielding hostile hammers. Understanding that with his book he has placed himself between the hammer of modern Judaism and the anvil of contemporary Christianity Hoffman laments, through the voice of Puritan William Prynne, about how contemporary Christianity is a obstacle to progress in evangelizing Judaics.

“Another reason that so-called Christian ministers, bishops and priests, assist the rabbis in keeping Judaic people in thrall is the ‘Money Engine’: ‘By this history we may perceive what a prevailing engine the Jew’s money is, both to serve into Christian kingdoms, though the most bitter, inveterate, professed enemies of Christ himself, Christians and Christianity, and how their money can induce even Christian princes to perpetrate most unchristian and antichristian actions; and enforce by threats and violence, even converted Christian Jews to renounce their Christianity, and apostasize to their former Jewish errors which they had quite renounced. And do not they still work by the self-same money engine? Preferred by too many Christians, before Christ himself and Christianity.'”

Hoffman’s concern in the book is evangelistic. He has sincere hopes that perhaps there may be those through the writing of this book who may be converted from Judaism to Biblical Christianity. Hoffman realizes that he will be pilloried for being a “hater” and a “anti-semite,” but he rightly asks how loving is it to not challenge a faith system that holds people in a terrible bondage. Hoffman insists that the love of Christ constrains him to rip the scab off the oozing wound that is Judaism with the hope that a healing salve can be placed upon it unto conversion.

“If we teach you nothing else, God grant you the grace to understand that it is the rabbis who are the world’s most flagrant and virulent Jew haters. This is a book of love, reflecting the love of God for all people, Judaic or Gentile, who are hostages to darkness. There are no hidden agendas or motives. All who say otherwise are liars and have for their patriarch, the Father of Lies.”

Shortly into his book Hoffman makes a key distinction that will be seen throughout his book. Hoffman distinguishes between Jews and Judaics. Hoffman labels Jews as those who are genetic descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, but includes also in the definition of “Jew” all those who have placed their faith in Jesus Christ citing I Peter 2:9. However, one must keep in mind here that Hoffman is saying that there are those who are Physical Jews and those who are Spiritual Jews. Some Physical Jews may be Spiritual Jews (Christians) but not all Physical Jews are Spiritual Jews. Hoffman distinguishes Jews from Judaics who he denominates as followers of Judaism regardless of their ethnic heritage. (Doubtless here Hoffman has the Khazars especially in mind.)

Ironically enough, even though percentage wise, very few who claim to be Jews racially are actually racially Jews, the Judaics who inhabit Judaism along with their addlepated hyper Dispensational Christian minister allies insist that Judiacs are saved is by race alone — a race which they do not, in a large number of cases do not even belong.

Like all men, Judaics and Physical Jews alike must be saved by looking to God’s Christ alone in order to be delivered from their Synagogue of Satan. Hoffman’s book is written in hopes that Judaics and Jews might be saved.