McAtee Interacts with Old Toby & His “Having No Legs” Blog — Part II

“… What it sounds like you’re saying is that since the color of your skin is from God, you must preserve it. But would you say the same about the color of your hair? The shape of your nose or ears? The color of your eyes? And I suppose the come-back would be, well, what if they were trying to exterminate your color of eyes or color of hair? But that’s where I refer you back to my previous point: despite some generalizations along those lines, it turns out that isn’t really what they are trying to exterminate. What they are really trying to exterminate is Christianity, and in America, a whole bunch of Christians have had lighter color skin. But there’s nothing inherently white about Christianity, as is likely to continue becoming obvious in the coming decades.”

Old Toby Sumpter
Having No Legs Blog

1.) This repeats the Gnostic error that race is only about the melanin level that a person has, as if race isn’t about every aspect of a person. It is a ignorant statement.

2.) Yes, we get that ultimately the Cultural Marxist crowd are not going after whites but rather are trying to roll Jesus Christ off his throne. Still, Old Tobe we have to ask, “why would they go after white people as proxies for going after Jesus Christ and His dominion?” And the answer to that is that the Cultural Marxist crowd understands something that you are absolutely clueless about (and it is cluelessness that finds you fighting on their side for all practical purposes) and that something is the fact that white people have been, by God’s providence and grace alone, the civilizational carriers of Christianity. Get rid of white people and the goal of rolling Jesus Christ off the throne is now merely a mopping up exercise.

So, to be sure, there is “inherently white about Christianity,” but there is something providentially white about Christianity and the Cultural Marxist gets that while you are busy making “No Duh”  arguments.

3.) The way you are arguing reminds me of a hypothetical situation in the frontier West. The Indians are galloping around a fort that is about to fall. However, in that band of Indians there are also a couple of white Braves who were captured in their youth and are now part of the Indian tribe about to scalp and rape the inhabitants of the Fort. People in the fort are lamenting and crying about the fact that the Indians are about to savage them. But not to fear… Captain Old Tobe is going around correcting those on the cusp of dying, “Hey, you shouldn’t be talking about those Indians out there because I saw a few white Braves out there also.”

Old Tobe Sumpter writes,

“But I’m also grateful for King Alfred and John Knox and George Washington. But the amount of pigment in their skin, the color of our hair, and shape of our noses had nothing to do with that heritage.”

Bret responds,

More Gnosticism. More reducing whom God has made us racially/ethnically to being about merely physical features as if race/ethnicity is dis-connected with the reality of who we are. Understand that Old Tobe here is arguing that genetics has nothing to do with our heritage. Understand also that the genetics that all of us have, regardless of our race/ethnicity is about God’s favor and providence. And while genetics can never save us, it doesn’t therefore mean that genetics have nothing to do with our heritage. If Old Tobe denies this he is denying that whole idea of “Christian families,” and covenant theology. Grace does tend to run in familiar lines and while that grace is not connected to regeneration it is connected to being baptized into the family of God.


McAtee Interacts with Old Toby & His “Having No Legs” Blog — Part I

What they (CRT) are really trying to exterminate is Christianity, and in America, a whole bunch of Christians have had lighter color skin. But there’s nothing inherently white about Christianity, as is likely to continue becoming obvious in the coming decades.

Rev. Old Toby Sumpter
Having No Legs BlogBret responds,

While it is true that there is nothing inherently white about Christianity to say what Old Toby says above is to reveal a tone-deafness on how God, by His grace and providence alone, has chosen to use White people to be the civilizational carrier of Christianity, generally speaking.

Old Toby writes,

“One friend replied in defense of Torba arguing that no one is arguing that ethnicities are totally fixed or hermetically sealed. But as I said in my reply, a whole bunch of his followers aren’t getting the memo.”

Old Toby Sumpter

Having No Legs Blog

Bret responds,

Implicitly this is the charge that many of the followers of Torba and Christian Nationalism are Nazis. Old Toby is saying here that many followers of Torba are hankering for the rise of the super Aryan race again.

And while there may be a miniscule number out there like that I call piffle on Old Toby’s putative point. Old Toby needs this point in order to justify his rabid opposition to Christian Nationalism and the necessity of preserving our ethnic boundaries and so Old Toby makes a mural out of this accusation that many of Torba’s followers secret Himmler fans.

Here’s a memo for Old Toby and his CREC comrades. How about finding some hard evidence that Torba’s fan base are strewn with Nazis before you begin insinuating that is the case?

“And my basic objection is that to allow “whiteness” and “Christian West” to be reduced to the same thing is to allow the categories of critical race theory to win.”

Old Toby Sumpter

Having No Legs Blog

Bret responds,

More utter tripe from Old Toby.

Do we need to remind Old Toby again that things can be generally true without being universally true? Do we have to, every time we talk about something say, “this is generally true” so that people like Old Toby won’t hear as saying “this is universally true.”

It is simply the case that it is generally true, exceptions notwithstanding (are you satisfied Tobe) that “whiteness” and the “Christian West” can be reduced to the same thing. Furthermore, acknowledging that reality does not, despite your lamebrained accusation, mean that the categories of Critical Race theory have won. It merely means that the categories of the white Christian West have won.

I’m telling you folks, the clergy corps of the CREC is not our friend in the battle royale to save the West and to save the people who made the West the West. With chaps like Wilson, Foster, Brito, Sumpter, and Hemmke it is clear that the CREC clergy is on the side of the devil in all this. They should be manfully resisted.

Old Toby writes,

“For example, Larry Elder is the new black face of “white supremacy,” according to the LA Times, and Rep. Ayanna Pressley isn’t interested in any “brown faces” that don’t want to be “brown voices.” Related would be the Supreme Court decision striking down at least some Affirmative Action legislation this last summer, and the full court conservative press against DEI policies in corporate America.”

Old Toby Sumpter

Having No Legs Blog

Bret responds,

So, when we look at the demographic voting patterns for Democratic candidates we see that the black vote is somewhere in the 90 plus percentile. So obviously there is a small minority of blacks, like Larry Elder, Clarence Thomas, Candace Owen, @Keon Garraway, etc. of whom we can say, “see it is not universally the case that whites are alone in this struggle against Cultural Marxism in the West.” So raise a Bronx cheer for Old Toby who has gone all Captain Obvious on us here. But again, none of these example disprove what is generally true and that is as it pertains to the West Christianity and white people while not exact synonyms are more involved than even kissing cousins.

And Old Tobey and the CREC knows this.

Old Tobey writes,

I would also like to point out that a majority of our anti-white elites are, well, whiter than leprous wonder bread. For all of their talk of deferring and empowering and uplifting “people of color”, the leprous whites are still in office, still in power. It’s more complicated than just skin color and ethnicity, and it’s foolish to merely accept some of their superficial claims.

Bret responds,

1.) Since this country is still somewhere around 67% white this observation is not shocking.

2.) Still, it would interesting to look at all these whites Old Tobe is telling us are “whiter than wonder bread” and ask, “how many of these wonder bread whites belong to the 2% of our population who like to pass off as wonder bread white people? I bet that number would shock old Toby.

3.) Still, I’m glad to agree that we have many Judas-goats among us. More than a few of them are in the CREC arguing the way Old Toby is arguing here.

Vivek Ramaswamy On Voting For a Hindu

I asked @VivekGRamaswamy what he would say to Christians who are concerned about voting for a Hindu: “We share the same value set in common…This is a Judeo-Christian nation. I think we need a commander-in-chief who shares those values.”

Glen Beck
Twitter

 
1.) This is NOT a Judeo-Christian nation. How could such a monster exist? How could a nation be both characterized by those who hate Jesus the Christ and those who love Jesus the Christ?
 
This is stupid.

2.) It is literally not possible to own allegiance to different gods (the god of the Hindus and the God of the Bible) and at the same time share the same values. Bearing allegiance to a different God/gods by necessity means having different values.

3.) What we need is a commander in chief who is a descendant of those whom the founders talked of when they wrote the Constitution saying “to us and our descendants.” There were no Hindu Indians at the Constitutional convention(s).

4.) Any Christian who votes for a Hindu, Jew, Humanist, Muslim, or Mormon for any office is committing an act of treason against his Liege-Lord Jesus Christ.

Critical Race Theory #1

Critical Theory

A methodological tool developed by Cultural Marxism that has entered into numerous fields so that we can speak of Critical Legal Theory, Critical Educational Theory, Critical Race Theory, etc.

We will be considering Critical Race theory during this series though that will be necessity bleed into these other areas.

We do so because CRT, known also as Race-Marxism and neo-Marxism and Western Marxism has become the 800 pound guerilla worldview competing against Biblical Christianity in the West.

We will see, eventually, that Race-Marxism is a competing religion with all the components that one will find in any religion.

Beginning we note that Critical Race Theory (CRT) can simply be defined as a ideological/theological theory that presupposes and so is based upon conflict of interest theory that categorizes people into “oppressed vs. oppressor” categories in order to advance a revolutionary agenda whereby power is shifted and so queered away from heteronormativity, white, and Christian people so that sexual perverts, non-Caucasian, feminists, Academics, and anti-Christ people are empowered.

If we were to use the words of Scripture CRT is the organized and allegedly  systematic attempt of the enemies of Christ to call evil good, and good evil; to put darkness for light, and light for darkness; to put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

Continuing to move along definitional lines, it needs be understood that CRT is a ideological/theological movement pushed by activists and putative scholars interested in studying and transforming the relationship among race, racism and power. It is key to understand here that there is no such thing as CRT that is only a philosophy.

CRT advocates embrace Marx’s maxim that

The task is not just to understand the world but to change it.”

So, there is no such thing as CRT that isn’t attempting to overthrow what little remains of Christian norms that have created the West.

We need to keep in mind here that this has long been the plan of the Cultural Marxists (who are the ones who developed CRT as a methodological tool) to transform the West. One of their own said;

‘We will make the west so corrupt that it stinks’.

Willie Munzenberg

CRT is one tool in the Cultural Marxist playbook to the end of “fundamentally transforming” America and the West.

So, CRT is interested in power. As such CRT can be further defined as an activist movement based upon biased study of what it calls “systemic racism” and how that putative systemic racism defines power and creates oppression in social orders.

This leads to the observation that like all Totalitarians CR Theorists are interested in ordering the world according to the vision contained in their theory. Because of this CRT calls everything they want to control “racist” until it is finally under their control.

And here you need to understand that everyone of you here is “racist” just be virtue of being white and there is nothing you can do to shed that reality. So, that fact is another reason why you should be interested in this subject matter. It is the interest of CRT to, as the Scripture teaches to make it so,

Dt. 28:43 “The alien who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower. 44 He shall lend to you, but you shall not lend to him; he shall be the head, and you shall be the tail.

The fact that CRT is interested in doing this — in transforming the world — is seen by their usage of cancel culture, the way they treat minorities who disagree with their agenda (they now refer to them as “adjacent white”) and the rise of fake news. CRT is all about seizing power to implement their agenda.

So, CRT seeks not only to understand power but to rearrange circumstances and society so that they (the pervert, the feminist, the Academic, the aggrieved minority) are the head and white Christians — regardless or not whether white Christians are white or not — are hewers of wood and drawers of water, or failing that just dead.

Now we explore the reality that Critical Race theory or “Race-Marxism” is anchored in a Marxist worldview.

Classical Marxism, or what CRT refers to as “vulgar Marxism” likewise posited a “oppressor – oppressed” conflict theory pushed as a method whereby a revolution could be brought in whereby the oppressed working class would overthrow the oppressor bourgeoisie capitalist class thus resulting in the arrival of Utopia. In Cultural Marxism the pivotal revolutionary point is no longer economic as between classes, but rather in Cultural Marxism the pivotal revolutionary point is now primarily race with perversion, feminism and Academia as co-laborers.

In classical Marxism the working class (proletariat) rises up to enter into revolution against the Moneyed class (bourgeoise) and sets the world aright by bringing in a New World Order of absolute equality among comrades. However, in Cultural Marxism using CRT the new proletariat is not comprised primarily of workers but of minorities first, followed by perverts, feminists, and Academics. The shift then between these two Marxisms is away from Economic Marxism to Cultural Marxism or Race-Marxism if you prefer. CRT takes the position that race should be understood as “the central construct for understanding inequality.” (Ladson Billings & Tate)

You have to understand, that whereas in Classical Marxism property was the chief sin in Cultural Marxism/Race Marxism whiteness is the chief sin and white people and white adjacent people are seen as owning the property of whiteness that they must be stripped of just as in cultural Marxism the property class needed to be stripped of their property. However, in both cases there is a push for equality/equity.

Of course in Biblical Christianity we see;

1.) Conflict of interest theory, the tool of CRT — being the leverage used by the Serpent in the garden where the Serpent convinces Eve that God the oppressor is oppressing Adam & Eve — the oppressed.

2.) Revolution is always the tool of Satan to overthrow God’s order (Babel). Christians should not talk about Revolution but rather use words like Reformation or Counter-Revolution.

So, to summarize, CRT is a Marxist theory, using conflict theory that categorizes all men by oppressor vs. oppressed to the end of bringing in a anti-Christ revolution using the organized muscle of minorities, feminists, perverts, and Academia as the new Marxist proletariat to throw off the white Christian heteronormativity that is a property of all white people as well as non-white people who refuse to embrace the Race-Marxist world and life view having as its ultimate goal to roll Jesus Christ off His throne so as to live in a world where Satan is Lord.

Because of this shift in Marxisms we know have undergone a shift from Leftist politics that centered on the economic concerns of the working class to the politics of identity.

This shift was needed because in the West the power of the classical Marist narrative where the money class as oppressor were oppressing the working class had dissipated in the face of the ever increasing prosperity in the West. It was hard to convince the working class to pull down their own house by pulling down the evil bourgeoise.

The truth of this is found in one of the central Cultural Marxists, Herbert Marcuse. Marcuse, like so many of the founders of Cultural Marxism was a Jew. Marcuse in two of his better known works (One Dimensional Man, and An Essay on Liberation) effectively complained that advanced capitalism had been too successful at producing a prosperous flourishing society and a healthy middle class, with the result that the working class had lost its Revolutionary spirit. Marcuse then asked where to find a new Revolutionary spirit and the answer he pushes is “in the ghetto populations,” notably the black liberation movement. We see then that the radicalization of minorities and students via capturing the Universities was a major plank in reorganizing Marxism in a racial direction finally giving birth to what we today call “identity politics.”

So, Marxism had to evolve and it evolved to latch on to race as the leverage point of oppressor vs. oppressed.

This tactic in the states goes way back but exploded in the 1960s with organizations like the Black Panthers and personalities like Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, and before them W. E. B. Dubois. The Marxists used minorities in America via the vehicle of the civil Rights movement to begin to implement their race-Marxism. However, it was only in the 1990’s when CRT begin to really flex its muscle.

Continuing with this session wherein we define and describe CRT we note that CRT, in light of all that we have so far said, is like colored lenses through which the whole world is examined with the purpose of finding “hidden” racism in what was heretofore considered “color-blind” law so as to create more and more people who understand how oppressed they are thus increasing the institutional and cultural power of CRT. The Gospel of CRT is to herald how oppressed people are so as to awaken them to how their oppressors must be overthrown.

Successful CRT then works to teach people to everywhere see racism on the part of white people. In the CRT religion white people and white adjacents (previously referred to in the past as Uncle Toms) are Lucifer and the CRT Gospel sets minorities, perverts, feminists, and Academics free from the shackles of the devil white people. In CRT the end goal is Utopia a bastardization of the Christian concept of Heaven. CRT is a religion competing with Christianity.

Because CRT is another Gospel it gets into everything from education to politics to art to family life.

Here is an example of CRT getting into family life;

“What we find is that, when contextualized amongst our other modern ethical norms, this preference for our children to biologically belong to us can feel downright ancient—a vestigial remnant of a different epoch, a fossil no longer animated by the same moral intuitions that gave it gravity in the past. In fact, many of the arguments that might be made in favor of this prejudice run precisely counter to other changing attitudes toward parenting, family, and the role of biology in culture.”

It’s a shocking line of thought, but one that has gained a fair amount of mainstream palatability as our outlook on the future devolves.

Another example of how Cultural Marxism gets into family life;

A trifecta of powerful globalist organizations is rigorously executing a plan to teach kindergarteners about sexuality and “empower” children to say yes to sexual encounters, according to agency documents reviewed by The Epoch Times.

Critics say this amounts to children being “groomed” for sex under the banner of human rights and education, while pedophilia is promoted and parental rights are undermined. Experts told The Epoch Times that the push for these programs to be accepted in nations around the world could lead to the practice of having sex with “consenting” children being viewed as acceptable.

Proponents of the programs say they seek to ensure that children’s “rights” to sexual pleasure are protected.

The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the United Nations are advancing children’s exposure to sexuality on two fronts, according to documents.

Examples of CRT in our judicial/legal realm

1.) Appointing Justices because of their race. SCOTUS Justice Jumanji Jackson Brown inability to define a woman.

2.) The prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse

3.) The Canonization of George Floyd

Remember, CRT is committed to the queering (turning upside down and inside out) of all previous Christian and so “white” social order characteristics. Remember also in two of the illustrations above the perverts are part of the new proletariat that is marching through the Institutions.

This is all an expression of our new religion of Cultural Marxism with its methodological tool of CRT.

And the sad thing is that it is not being completely and thoroughly resisted by the Reformed-Evangelical church. In point of fact it is being supported in some of its expressions as seen in this recent comment left on Iron Ink by someone attending a “conservative” “Reformed” “Church” in this area;

“They (some Elders) see themselves as having a bridge to others (CRT tpyes), and see me as someone who will drive pro-CRT people away, and cause division.

It’s why they never did fight CRT, but seek to see the workable components of it. Maybe it’s a pride they are blind to, this faith that they can see a higher and more peaceable way.

I don’t know why they don’t see as we do, there is no compromise with a Marxist.”

Now having said all this we should add that Critical Race Theorists don’t like being constrained by a definition. They themselves avoid definitions because in the avoiding of definition they can shape shift into anything else they might want to be.

CRT proponents will insist that only advocates of CRT can truly understand CRT. If you’re not CRT you can’t critique it because you don’t really understand it.

Another thing we need to understand about CRT is its conviction that racism in the West is systemic. By this they mean that even if there were no white people who were themselves individually racist the social order itself is still racist. This is because, per CRT, the whole social order was set up by those who owned the property of whiteness and therefore the whole social order itself, quite apart from any consideration of current white people, remains “racist.” The only thing that can be done to ameliorate this reality is to tear it down and start all over again. This was the conclusion of Max Horkheimer, another Jew Cultural Marxist, who believed that it is not possible to create substantive change to a system from within the system. The only way substantive change can be done is by a Revolution that tears the whole old system down.

This explains again who CRT must have Revolution. CRT cannot be considered as successful without a Leninist-Maoist type Revolution. The tail must become the head and the head must become the tail.

So CRT is committed to ending the racism that benefits white people as the fundamental organizing principle of Western society. You people sitting here tonight are the prime targets of CRT and its Mother Cultural Marxism.

And frankly it is either destroy or be destroyed. This battle is for keeps and it can genuinely be reduced to the Kingdom of Satan seeking to tear down the Kingdom of God and His Christ.


Doctor Strange and the Multicult of Madness Part I

Over here;

Mid-America Seminary sponsors a podcast having as a guest Dr. Alan Strange. Dr. Strange had decided to do a four part series of the subject of Christian Nationalism.

Now, as it is my conviction that Reformed Clergy have an absolutely tin ear when it comes to this subject (and a host of others) I thought I might give this a listen, doubting from the outset that this podcast was going to encourage me much.

I was right. All I got from Dr. Strange’s podcast was discouragement combined with a list of books, many of which I’ve already read.

Generally speaking, Strange’s main problem is that he keeps talking about “secular” culture as if such a thing existed. Strange even categorizes “secular culture” as being more benign vs. more vicious. Strange doesn’t seem to realize that the more benign version of “secular” culture is just Stephen King’s Kujo as a cute little puppy before he grows up and becomes all vicious. All benign “secular” culture is, is the vicious version just getting its legs under it.

Strange, like so many Reformed clergy does not seem to realize that there is no such thing as “secular” culture. He does not seem to realize that when it comes to culture there is no neutrality. Either a culture reflects Christ and therefore is Christian or it does not reflect Christ and therefore is “secular.” And it really isn’t “secular” since all culture is driven by its theological convictions. Culture is the outward manifestation of a set peoples inward beliefs. The point here is that “benign secular culture,” is never benign but is always being driven by a “I Hate Christ and love some other God” motif.

Dr. Strange begins the podcast by saying;

“My overall assessment — well let me just say this — I’d say it (Christian Nationalism) is a wrong-headed response to many of the cultural currents.”

Dr. Alan Strange
Mid-America Podcast

So, I take it if Christian Nationalism is a wrong-headed response to many cultural currents that anti-Christian anti-Nationalism would be the right response to many cultural currents? I mean, where else are we as Christians to go when it comes to this issue except to Christian Nationalism? Does Strange prefer Christian Internationalism (i.e. — “Christian” Communism)? Does Strange prefer America as “Christian” Empire? It is just nuts that we have so many denouncing Christian Nationalism while not giving us a Biblical alternative.

Dr. Strange goes on to offer;

“We live in a particularly polarized and politicized atmosphere and I don’t think that we want as Christians simply to add to that by embracing this title (of Christian Nationalism).”

Dr. Alan Strange
Mid- America Seminary
Podcast on Christian Nationalism

1.) Look, its hard not to call this cowardice. Why shouldn’t Christians want to add to this polarized and politicizes atmosphere? These people in this culture are coming after us with sharpened knives and Strange’s advice is to not become polarized or politicized? That is damn strange advice if you ask me.

2.) Notice how Strange is scared of the sobriquet “Christian Nationalist.” The phrase has now, by the work of our enemies, become so polarizing that Strange concludes that we must never embrace it. This is the old game of the Marxists that I myself have run into. I’ve been told countless times, “You shouldn’t embrace the term ‘Kinist’ Bret since there are so many bad connotations.” Now, we are being told that the alternate term that people have landed upon, “Christian Nationalist” is also a terms we should flee. This is just stupid. The enemy, whose expertise is polarizing will steal any term or phrase we might like and poison the well. And the laughable thing is, is that it is then our folks who come along and say that because of the enemy’s work of polarizing our language therefore we should give up our language.

As I said… this is both stupid and cowardly.

When are we going to stand and fight?

Oh, I forgot, per people like Strange (and their name is LEGION) it is not Christian to either fight or even be polarizing.

This is so pathetic.

And it is made all the more so by many of the people that Strange recommends that people should be reading?

Kidd?
Mattson?
De Young?

Gag me with a crozier.