Revolutionaries Inside the Church — The Plan & The Implementation

“The French Illuminatus, however, did not fall into the error of his English contemporary (Robert Owen), of alienating public opinion by the repudiation of Christianity; on the contrary, faithful to the directions of Weishaupt Saint Simon in his book Le Nouveau Christianisme, set out to prove that his (Illuminati) system was simply the fulfillment of Christ’s teaching on the brotherhood of man, which had become perverted by the belief in the necessity for subduing the flesh; “therefore in order to re-establish Christianity on its true basis it was necessary to restore its sensual side, the absence of which strikes its social action with sterility.” * It is easy to see how such a theory fits in with the plan of the Haute Vente for general demoralization.

Of course, as Weishaupt had foreseen, the method of identifying Christianity with Socialism proved immensely effectual. The wild-eyed revolutionary waving a red flag will never gain so many converts as the mild philosopher who preaches peaceful revolution carried out on the principles of Christian love and brotherhood. It was this old deception of representing Christ as a Socialist which made the strength of Saint-Simonism, and that, practiced later on by the so-called Christian Socialists of our own country, not only drew countless amiable visionaries into Socialism but at the same time drove many virile minds from Christianity to seek relief in Nietzscheism.

In reality, no two principles could be more opposed than that of Christ, who taught that ” a man’s life consisteth not in the abundance of the things that he possesseth,” and that of the purely materialistic philosophy which urges mankind to strive for one thing only — present welfare and to indulge the grossest sensual passions…

A significant result of this parting company between Socialism and Illuminism was shown in the abandonment of the campaign of militant Atheism that had distinguished the earlier Revolutionary movement, and the readers of Atelier were enjoined to regard the clergy no longer as ‘suspects,’ but as possible allies. ‘The Revolution has only to proclaim itself Christian, to desire only what Christianity command,’ and the clergy will be obliged to unite with it.”

Nesta Webster
World Revolution — p. 110-114

Clearly, the modern Evangelical & Reformed Church, exceptions notwithstanding having been co-opted by the philosophy advanced by Saint Simon and the Socialists now are those who advance the agenda of Communistic Revolutionaries.

This was seen in the latest round of the Church Assemblies. The Southern Baptists elected a leftist plagiarizer to be President while the PCA continued to play footsies with the Side-b gay brigade. Not to be found wanting the OPC molly-coddled their feminists. All of this is merely the continued extension of the Revolutionary mindset that has successfully insinuated itself into what was once considered the orthodox and conservative expression of the Reformed and Evangelical faith.

Any Christian — minister or laymen — who gets crosswise of this new burgeoning Revolutionary “Christian” faith is set upon like a pack of starving hyenas sporting with a dying creature. If you have any doubts just ask one Rev. Michael Spangler of the OPC who just had the hyenas of the OPC rip and tear at him for truthfully calling a feminist spade a ruddy wolf shovel. Failing that you can ask your humble correspondent about how the hyenas got more than their pound of flesh from me as I have been labeled everything from a “racist” to a “misogynist” by ecclesial Revolutionaries who are themselves the intellectual seed of Weishaupt, Babeuf, Buonartti, and Saint Simon who themselves were of their Father the Devil.

This is not the first time we have seen the Revolutionary impulse we are seeing now. Ironically enough, the PCA, which now is a nest of epistemologically self-conscious Revolutionaries originally separated from their Mother church — the PCUS — because the conviction of the PCA founders was that the PCUS had become Revolutionary. Can you imagine the PCA of today agreeing with the words of one of their founders, Dr. John Edwards Richards?

Causes of Separation in 1973 (PCA separates from PCUS)

  • The Socialist, who declares all men are equal. Therefore there must be a great leveling of humanity and oneness of privilege and possession.
  • The Racial Amalgamationist, who preaches that the various races should be merged into one race and differences erased in oneness.
  • The Communist, who would have one mass of humanity coerced into oneness by a totalitarian state and guided exclusively by Marxist philosophy.
  • The Internationalist, who insists on co-existence between all peoples and nations that they be as one regardless of ideology or history.

    Dr. John Edwards Richards also spoke his mind without being disciplined by anybody on other subjects.

    “No human can measure the anguish of personality that goes on within the children of miscegenation… Let those who would erase the racial diversity of God’s creation beware lest the consequence of their evil be visited upon their children.”

    Here is Dr. John Edwards Richards speaking in such a way circa 1973 in a way that would find the PCA Revolutionaries today clawing their ears in maniacal discomfort.

    “The vast majority of good thinking people prefer to associate with, and intermarry with, people of their respective race; this is part of the God-given inclination to honor and uphold the distinctiveness of separate races. But there are many false prophets of oneness, and many shallow stooges, who seek to force the amalgamation of the races.”

    Dr. John Edwards Richards in 1973 was speaking against miscegenation. Today’s PCA Revolutionaries are speaking for the acceptability of their ministers being horny for other men. Can anybody here disagree that the Revolution continues within the previously orthodox denominations and churches?

    And just in case anybody thinks that Dr. John Edwards Richards was unique let’s have just one word from Dr. Morton Smith who likewise was a founder of the PCA.

    The Racial Problem Facing America (1964)

If from this we may conclude that ethnic pluriformity is the revealed will of God for the human race in its present situation, it is highly questionable whether the Christian can have part in any program that would seek to erase all ethnic distinctions. That such distinctions may be crossed over by individuals may be granted, but it is at least questionable whether a program designed to wipe out such differences on a mass scale should be endorsed by the Christian. It is this line of argument that the average Christian segregationist uses to back his view. He fears that the real goal of the integrationist is the intermarriage of the races, and therefore the breakdown of the distinctions between them. Many who would be willing to integrate at various lesser levels refuse to do so, simply because they feel that such will inevitably lead to intermarriage of the races, which they consider to be morally wrong. . . .

The mass mixing of the races with the intent to erase racial boundaries he does consider to be wrong, and on the basis of this, he would oppose the mixing of the two races in this way. Let it be acknowledged that a sin in this area against the Negro race has been perpetrated by godless white men, both past and present, but this does not justify the adoption of a policy of mass mixing of the races. Rather, the Bible seems to teach that God has established and thus revealed his will for the human race now to be that of ethnic pluriformity, and thus any scheme of mass integration leading to mass mixing of the races is decidedly unscriptural.

Dr. Morton H. Smith 1923-2019
For more see: Dr. Morton H. Smith on Christianity, Race, and Segregation

Does anybody out there really believe that these views of two of the founders of the PCA could be successfully held by someone trying to be ordained in any of our “conservative denominations?” No, views like these will find one hearing for calls from the ministerial corps to hang the guilty ordinate wannabee from the highest yardarm. There will be catcalls from the cheap seats of “Neo-confederate,” “Hater,” and “extremist.” The name of Jesus will be invoked and a sudden chant of “love me do” will arise from those who have taken holy orders.

So where does all this end? Why it ends in the continuation of tacking to the Revolutionary left. The SBC, the OPC, the PCA, and others like them will soon be where their comrades of the Christian Reformed Church of North America (CRCNA) are. Remember it was not that many years ago when the CRCNA was cheek by jowl with the PCA and OPC in the conservative NAPARC (National Association of Presbyterian and Reformed Churches). Indeed, the CRCNA was just finally expelled from NAPARC this year after suffering the indignity of being suspended since 1999. (Did anybody notice?) Now, however, the “Conservative” brethren who tossed the CRCNA are just a few years behind their “Dutch” comrades who are hanging ten on the Revolutionary wave. Listen to the surfer dudes of the CRCNA;


“Congregations must also call people who are attracted to the same sex into recognized positions of service and leadership. Having been ostracized for so long, many will need support and encouragement in using their gifts for the good of the body. They should be encouraged to use their unique experiences—including their attraction to the same sex—to help others. The church needs more godly people who are attracted to the same sex to serve as pastors, elders, and deacons….

Congregations must also call people who are attracted to the same sex into recognized positions of service and leadership. Having been ostracized for so long, many will need support and encouragement in using their gifts for the good of the body. They should be encouraged to use their unique experiences—including their attraction to the same sex—to help others. The church needs more godly people who are attracted to the same sex to serve as pastors, elders, and deacons.”

Christian Reformed Church
AGENDA FOR SYNOD 2021 Biblical Theology of Human Sexuality 117-118

This is the future of you clergy staying in the OPC, PCA, SBC, etc. The die is cast. The Revolutionary impulse isn’t something about to happen to you, or that might happen to you if you don’t strap up. In the words of Garet Garret it is “The Revolution that Was.” Because you weren’t watchmen on the walls the Revolutionary expressions of R2K, CRT, Federal Vision, New Perspective on Paul, Cultural Marxism, Side-B sodomy, et. al. have already taken over your denominations.

So what is left to be done for clergy and laymen alike? Pull a Lot and flee for your life and in the words of Donald Thomas Scholz, “Don’t look back.” Let the effeminate soy boys have your denominations. They will die on the vine as the CRCNA has (25% loss in the last 25 years). Cease giving money to your churches so that they can send it up the Denominational food chain. You are only paying for your own burial. Cease sending your children to these damned by God denominational colleges – by doing so you are only communicating your hatred for your children. Do you really want your daughters to be like the Pastor’s wife or your sons to be like the Pastor. (Admit it… you don’t… it’s ok … it’s just you and I talking here.) Quit insisting on sitting under the ministry of these soy boy Clergy – you’re only being processed by all the leftist, nut-less, pinko sermons and Sunday school lessons. Come out from among them and be ye separate.

The visible church is dead and this version of it is not coming back. Good riddance.

The visible church is dead … Long live the Church.

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.