1.) Semantic deception

Use words that the rank and file think they know the meaning of and then fill those words with different meaning so that when you use a word in a particular setting those assembled hear you saying “A” while those in the know understand that you are saying “Z.” On this one remember your Orwell, and his “Ministry of Truth,” and his “Double-think” from “1984.”

Example – The Changing of Christianity from a set core of beliefs and doctrines to a set of feelings, experiences or emotions. The name and title Jesus Christ remain but the doctrinal core of who Jesus Christ is, is deleted and filled anew by talk of “having a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.” Each individual person is left to decide for themselves what that relationship means and who Jesus Christ is for them.

2.) Gradualism

The methodology embraced by the Fabian Socialist, gradualism takes the evolutionary incremental approach to change. In the 1960′s we begin normalizing divorce. In 1973 we begin normalizing sodomy. In 2012, we begin talking about the normalcy of incest.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/11/can-sex-between-brothers-and-sisters-ever-be-normal/?intcmp=obnetwork

3.) Employ the Hegelian dialectic

Create conflict (crisis) with the established norm (Thesis). Raise up a extreme opposing party in that conflict (Antithesis). Provide your solution (what you were going after originally) as the necessary change (synthesis). Call the change “consensus.”

Examples;

Noe-Babelists change agents must abolish local control of education (the “Thesis”) in order to restructure our schools from academics to global workforce training (the “Synthesis”). Funding of education with the property tax allows local control, but it also enables the change agents and teachers’ unions to create higher and higher school budgets paid for with higher taxes, thus infuriating homeowners. Eventually, property owners accept the change agents’ radical proposal (the “Anti- thesis”) to reduce their property taxes by transferring education funding from the local property tax to the state income tax. Thus, the change agents accomplish their ultimate goal; the transfer of funding of education from the local level to the state level. When this transfer occurs it increases state/federal control and funding, leading to the federal/internationalist goal of implementing global workforce training through the schools (the “Synthesis”).

When I was a boy I accidentally applied the Hegelian dialectic to one particular chore quite unknowingly. My Folks “Thesis” was for me to vacuum the carpet. My “Antithesis” was a carpet that was still soiled after I had vacuumed. The synthesis I desired was the carpet is clean without Bret vacuuming the carpet. The crisis I created was by repeatedly vacuuming the carpet in such a way that it remained soiled. The synthesis (consensus) of my folks was to have another sibling vacuum the carpet.

4.) Gain Control of the Information Outlets

This is why the internet is so potentially dangerous because on the internet the truth can be ferreted out with only a little work.

David Rockefeller, in Baden-Baden, Germany, 1991, thanked the major media for keeping secret the elitists’ plan for the world. He said: “… it would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.”

5.) Gain Control of the purse strings

Resistance to change, as brought by those with an agenda against the established theory, theology, ideology, principle, or practice, will be next to impossible if those who are the Change agents control the purse strings of the Institution. The only exception to this might be if those advocating change somehow tapped another sources of wealth.

6.) Gain Control of the Leadership Structure

Once both the information and the purse strings are controlled it is comparatively easy to staff positions with the chosen people, if only because people kiss up to those who can control their future opportunity to advance.

7.) Secure the allegiance of subsequent generations

Again, once 4-6 is accomplished, #7 is comparatively easy.

One aspect of #7 is to keep the rank and file dumb and ignorant often by the use of bread and circuses. Shut down inquisitive minds. Distract people who have probing questions. Marginalize anybody whose probing looks to threaten the reality that the change agents have built and approve of.

Another aspect of #7 is to create an approved public mind. Mold people so that if they are out of step with the the opinion of the Institutional community they will self-correct themselves and bring themselves back in line with approved group think. Use subtle (and when necessary not so subtle) means of reinforcement and punishment in order to reinforce this idea of the public mind (group think).

B. F. Skinner was a psychologist who had monumental influence over Government schools. Skinner followed in the footsteps of W. Wundt, G. Stanley, Hall, E. L. Thorndyke, John Dewey, and many others by helping to psychologize American education in a humanist direction, thus helping to construct our current Psychological culture.

Here are some excerpts from “Skinner’s, “Walden Pond Two.” These excerpts give us insight in what kind of culture Skinners envisioned.

245 — “We not only can control human behavior, we MUST.”
219 — “The New Order”
189 — “Psychologists are our Priests”
286 — “What is love except the use of positive reinforcement?”
278 — “Let us control the lives of our children and see what we can make of them.”

186 — “We can make men adequate for group living … That was our faith.”

134 — “Our goal is to have every adult member of Walden II regard our children as his own, and to have every child think of every adult as his parent.”

135 — “No sensible person will suppose that love or affection has anything to do with blood.”

108 — “History is honored in Walden Two only as entertainment.”
105 — “We are always thinking of the whole group.”
160 — “We are opposed to competition.”
139 — “The community, as a revised family.”

Conclusion?

This fictional account of Skinner’s ideal community is much like the language and laws in use today by the behavioral elite — describing their plans for your children, your schools, your country, your family, and yourself. How do you like your life and behavior managed and chosen for you by an elite who are intellectual pygmies, moral buffoons, above all else Christ haters?