God Is Not Mocked

Text — II Kings 2
Subject — The Character of God
Theme — The character of God as seen in the mauling bear’s incident of II Kings 2
Proposition — …. should remind us of the Holy God we serve

Today is “Sanctity of Life” Sunday. The one day that is set aside yearly to specifically confess this great sin of which we all are partakers and to pray that God might grant us repentance from our wickedness. Of course Abortion, in our time, has served as one of the great markers of the culture wars that is raging in the West.

We should not think however that culture wars are unique to us. Whenever you have people belonging to the same nation who have given their allegiances to different gods there you will find culture wars.

We see some of that in Israel during the times of the post-Davidic Kings. We all remember a high expression of those Culture wars as they raged on Mt. Carmel in I Kings 18 where the solitary Man of God does battle with the 850 representatives of Baal and Asherah. That passage comes to us far more squarely as a Worldview conflict with life and death implications.

However this passage that we are looking at today, I believe continues to give us insights into the worldview conflicts / culture wars during those times in Ancient Israel. I believe an examination of this passage, concentrating especially on the mauling of the youths, will reveal to us that this is not the case of a capricious God who has anger management issues but rather it is a case of a Holy God doing the very same thing He did on Mt. Carmel when He upheld the character of His name for all to see.

We must remember that the character of the times which we are looking at are revealed to us in II Chronicles 36

15 The LORD, the God of their ancestors, sent word to them through his messengers again and again, because he had pity on his people and on his dwelling place. But they mocked God’s messengers, despised his words and scoffed at his prophets until the wrath of the LORD was aroused against his people and there was no remedy

So in order to set the table here we must keep in mind that all of this is happens among God’s covenant people. Israel has been set apart, by God, to be a witness and priest to the nations. In the immediate time frame Israel has miserably disobeyed God and has been dishonored among His people and so among the Nations as well. Israel had been promised great blessings if she would be obedient but similarly great curses if she were disobedient to her calling (Cmp. Dt. 28, Lv. 26:21-22.).

Israel should have already learned that they were uniquely accountable to God as His people. When God’s people rebel, their sin is high-handed because they have more to rebel against. And what we find in this passage is God’s people rebelling.

Secondly, after the showdown between Ahab and Jezebel’s Baalism, and Elijah, (I Ki. 18) Ahab still did not repent. Elijah became a new Moses. He did not run away as many suppose, but walked straight to the same mountain, the same cave, where Moses saw the glory of God. Elijah became the Moses of a new interim covenant with a remnant of believers. That is why, in the passage in question, there are two ‘water crossings’. Elijah as the new Moses has a water crossing that symbolizes Exodus out of Egypt and into the Wilderness. Elisha is with Elijah representing the remnant who have not bowed the knee to Baal. Later, Elisha as the new Joshua, after seeing Elijah ascend as kind of a first-fruits of all that will follow, has a water crossing symbolizing entry into the new covenant land that is to be conquered.

Like Moses whose grave could not be found, Elijah can not be found after his ascension and so Elisha is established as the Elijah’s Joshua who is given a pentecostal type double blessing upon all his work. To change the metaphor slightly Elijah is the Christ who goes ahead and Elisha is the Church who remains behind to do the King’s work and who is doubly blessed to do the work that must be done.

Elisha is working in terms of a covenant already established. This covenant promises blessings for obedience. And Elisha, as God’s conquering representative, is used to bless a place (Jericho — vs. 18) that had formerly known only curse.

Joshua 6:26

“At that time Joshua pronounced this solemn oath: “Cursed before the LORD is the one who undertakes to rebuild this city, Jericho”

Elisha requests a new bowl possibly because a new bowl would not be unclean and he asks for salt. Salt is often associated with the OT sacrifices and so is associated with the cleansing that comes by way of sacrifice. And that is what we find here that the salt provides — A cleansing of the waters and so the land. This becomes a sort of Atonement for the land.

As we noted earlier though, the Covenant promises not only blessings but cursing as well. And it is interesting that we find God’s representative as the one who brings both blessing and cursing.

Here we see Elisha as a Christ figure. Either we will petition him for atonement for the springs out of which our life proceeds or we will be cursed for our mocking behavior. The passage before us reminds us that there is no “third way” with God. Either we will be atoned for or we will be suffer the curse of the covenant.

Now a word or two concerning vs. 23-25

First, remember that all of this is happening in the context of idolatrous Israel. Israel is whoring after other gods. That this is so is seen in the previous chapter where the King of Israel desires advice from the Baal-Zebub, the god of Ekron whether he will live or not from a fall he had. God is none to pleased with this and inserts himself to give counsel to this King that he is going to die.

The land is rife with idolatry. This must be kept in mind to understand this passage.

Second, note that Elisha is headed towards Bethel (23). Keep in mind that Bethel is the hub of this idolatry. Remember your OT History. King Jeroboam, years prior to this, had instituted his own system of worship by setting up two idolatrous shrines with golden calf images when he broke from Judah (See 1 Kings 12.). One shrine was established at Dan, in the far north of the kingdom, and the other was strategically located at Bethel, on the border with the southern kingdom of Judah. Jeroboam also made up his own priesthood from among his own people. All of this Baal paganism in the Northern Kingdom can be traced back to Bethel. Elisha was headed into enemy territory when he was headed for Bethel.

Now between these two facts,

1.) The land is rife w/ idolatry

2.) Bethel is the hub of that idolatry

And between the reality that Elisha is God’s Joshua re-conquering the land visiting covenatal blessings and cursing upon God’s covenant people I don’t think it is a stretch at all to premise that what Elisha runs into is a pack of pagan Seminarians who are mocking God’s covenantal spokesman. What we have here, I would contend, is not a bunch of three year olds teasing a Prophet about his baldness, but rather what we have is a bunch of young adults testing the living God.

The word “youth” in the passage is used to designate people elsewhere in the OT of the ages of anywhere from twelve to thirty years old. These youths … these priests of Baal in training are mocking God’s prophet. To mock God’s spokesman is to mock God. Their mocks come to us as “baldness,” but such a mocking may have had to do with

1) natural loss of hair;
2) a shaved head denoting his separation to the prophetic office; or more likely,
3) an epithet of scorn and contempt accusing Elisha of being a Leper since Lepers had to shave their heads

Suffice it to say that insult ‘baldhead’ was one of “contempt in the East, applied to a person even with a bushy head of hair.”

Their cat-cries to “go up” doubtless refers to their desire to for Elisha to go away the same way that Elijah had “gone up to heaven.” They wanted to be rid of God’s spokesman.

So here we have the ideological kin of the 850 that Elijah executed at Mt. Carmel. You would have thought that they had learned their lesson.

We should note that the bears mauled 42 of the youths which indicates that Elisha was likely facing many more detractors then the 42 who were cursed.

We should also note that being mauled by wild beasts was a sign of covenant curse.

Lev 26:21 “Then if you walk contrary to me and will not listen to me, I will continue striking you, sevenfold for your sins. 22And I will let loose the wild beasts against you, which shall bereave you of your children and destroy your livestock and make you few in number, so that your roads shall be deserted.

So, being torn in two by scavenging birds and wild beasts was a curse of the Covenant that is often repeated throughout the Bible. We see it beginning with the raven sent out by Noah, that fed on the floating bodies until the waters went down. If you remember, Jezebel was eaten by dogs, Saul’s sons were hung high but one of their mothers chased the birds away. Abraham chased the birds away from the divided animals that purified the Land, etc. There are many more examples.

These youths were violating the covenant by mocking God and God, who is patient and long-suffering gave them what He promised. Like those who Elijah dismissed after Carmel, these are dismissed by God. Jezebel’s children shall not stand in the company of the righteous.

Now, today what we get are people running to this passage complaining about a capricious God with anger management problems. But the thing we need to keep in mind is not that the action of God here is surprising but rather that this doesn’t happen all the time is what is surprising. Each of us deserves our own personalized female bear.

But God is gracious and has provided for people a covering in Jesus Christ who took our mauling for us. Christ bore the covenant curses that we might know the covenant blessings and that we might walk in the ways of the covenant in order to glorify Him.

You can be sure of this that God will cut off the wicked completely and finally. They will not stand w/ the righteous. The fact that we still have our own culture wars is indicative of God’s patience and the day of grace that we live in. However, you can be sure that if we will not repent of our wickedness a day is coming when the judgment of God will come upon fall upon the wickedness of our land just as it fell upon the wickedness of the land of Israel.

Author: jetbrane

I am a Pastor of a small Church in Mid-Michigan who delights in my family, my congregation and my calling. I am postmillennial in my eschatology. Paedo-Calvinist Covenantal in my Christianity Reformed in my Soteriology Presuppositional in my apologetics Familialist in my family theology Agrarian in my regional community social order belief Christianity creates culture and so Christendom in my national social order belief Mythic-Poetic / Grammatical Historical in my Hermeneutic Pre-modern, Medieval, & Feudal before Enlightenment, modernity, & postmodern Reconstructionist / Theonomic in my Worldview One part paleo-conservative / one part micro Libertarian in my politics Systematic and Biblical theology need one another but Systematics has pride of place Some of my favorite authors, Augustine, Turretin, Calvin, Tolkien, Chesterton, Nock, Tozer, Dabney, Bavinck, Wodehouse, Rushdoony, Bahnsen, Schaeffer, C. Van Til, H. Van Til, G. H. Clark, C. Dawson, H. Berman, R. Nash, C. G. Singer, R. Kipling, G. North, J. Edwards, S. Foote, F. Hayek, O. Guiness, J. Witte, M. Rothbard, Clyde Wilson, Mencken, Lasch, Postman, Gatto, T. Boston, Thomas Brooks, Terry Brooks, C. Hodge, J. Calhoun, Llyod-Jones, T. Sowell, A. McClaren, M. Muggeridge, C. F. H. Henry, F. Swarz, M. Henry, G. Marten, P. Schaff, T. S. Elliott, K. Van Hoozer, K. Gentry, etc. My passion is to write in such a way that the Lord Christ might be pleased. It is my hope that people will be challenged to reconsider what are considered the givens of the current culture. Your biggest help to me dear reader will be to often remind me that God is Sovereign and that all that is, is because it pleases him.

One thought on “God Is Not Mocked”

  1. Grammar:
    Original: “Like those WHO Elijah dismissed after Carmel, these are dismissed by God.”
    Edit: “Like those WHOM Elijah dismissed” The people are the object receiving the action.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *