What does it mean that a nation founded on the sacred ideas of personal liberty and individual responsibility and where the Government, as a controlling agency, was severely restricted in what it could control, has now become a nation where the citizenry is forced, by the Government, to fund pharmaceutical abortifacients for licentious, irresponsible but sacred whoredom, where the Government, by way of policy, holds minorities as sacred to the point where they can only be the victims of White oppression and never the victims of their own desultory and self-immolating behavior, and where the Government worships at the shrine of perversion, forcing the citizenry to embrace, as a culture, the embrace of sacred sodomy?
What does it mean when a Nation, who once believed that Justice was blind — thus suggesting that Lady Justice was sacred precisely because she saw neither status, condition, or skin, when applying the law, — is now a nation which has advanced a woman to the Supreme Court who could defy the founding sentiment of a blind Lady Justice with the words, “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life?” What does it mean when a Nation who ruled that Dred Scott had no rights as a citizen is now a nation where a son of Dred Scott’s people will not prosecute the New Black Panthers for denying citizens the right to vote? What does it mean when a Nation, which once extended sympathy to Khazars because of oppression against them is now a nation that can not criticize the Kahazars because of their oppression of us?
What does it mean when a Nation was so literate that its farmers could easily follow “The Federalists Papers” as they came out as a series of Newspaper articles but now is so illiterate that newspapers are written for a 7th grade reading level? What does it meant when rural America could listen to the Lincoln vs. Douglas debates go for hours and follow every nuance of freewheeling unmediated debate yet today has a hard time understanding sound bite campaign tripe? What does it mean that we have gone from Jonathan Edwards, Samuel Davies and Archibald Alexander to Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, and Tim Keller?
Ouch! – Grouping Pastor Keller with Joel Osteen? What’s up with that? I’m an NYC OPC guy, and like some of Pastor Keller’s stuff. Nobody is perfect, and I’d say he is surely on the same team as me. Anyway…
As for your questions:
The grass is always greener on the other side, and this is sometimes true when considering “the glory days”. Nevertheless, you obviously have some points.
“What it means” is that in some of the areas you pointed out, we have changed for the worse. Basically we as a nation need God to turn us to him. Christ is the answer. We need sovereign intervention. Hopefully he does so, and through his church. That would be wonderful!
I’ve never tried to enumerate the positive changes in our country that have happened over its history. I’m sure there are many! – I’m still a realist though. Things ain’t looking close to perfect. I’d like to approach life seeing the glass half full anyway.
Here’s one positive: Your blog. That is, the internet and technological innovation. Thank God for the transparency the internet and technology has brought about.
God is good, and on the throne as he will forever be. I’ll continue to trust in him. =)
Greetings Brian.
You’re welcome to Rev. Keller. As long as I witness hemming and hawwing and double stepping like I see here,
I will leave him to others.
Thanks for seeking to answer the questions on the post. I’m sorry I wasn’t clearer that they were intended to be rhetorical questions.
God is Good … God is Great
And with Knox I’ll affirm that while contending for the Crown Rights of King Jesus.
Thanks for stopping and commenting Brian. Preach up Christ tomorrow.