A little good natured humor at Moanin’ Owen Strachan’s expense;
Owen Strachan’s favorite bible story as a little boy?
Joseph & the coat of many colors.
Owen Strachan’s favorite bible story as an “adult?”
Joseph and the coat of many colors.
What’s the difference between Robespierre denouncing Lafayette and Owen Strachan denouncing Bret L. McAtee?
Oh, about 230 years.
Owen Strachan … inveighing against preferring all beef hotdogs since 1983.
Owen Strachan… Insisted, even as a child, that those who don’t like PB and J sandwiches preferring instead only Peanut Butter or Jelly are exhibiting their sinful fallenness.
“Not so sure about that ‘only one way to heaven’ stuff. There is a lot of partiality in that idea.”
Owen Strachan
“It is egregious sin to say it is normative to wear matching shoes every day.”
Owen Strachan
Marriage has found me sleeping with my wife only. Pray for me Dr. Moanin’ Owen Strachan that I might be released from this preference bondage so that I might sleep with other women.
Owen Strachan calls on all Christians to pray for Amanda Gentry who has been making meals for her own kids before making them for anyone else’s kids.
Amanda being convicted cries out… “Pray for me.”
Amanda Gentry also confesses
“Father forgive me.
I packed my husband lunch without even thinking about other husbands’ lunch, that’s the depths of my depravity.”
Amanda Gentry
“In the Confessional Booth w/ Father Owen Strachan”
New on Paramount Online Streaming
File Under: Can you find the contradiction? I bet you can.
“Kinism is the partial (thus sinful) preferring of your own people over others.”
Owen Strachan
Substack Article
Substack Article
“It is not wrong to enjoy your own heritage, culture, and background. Neither is it wrong to prefer your family’s or country’s customs, habits, and traditions, or even—to flip this around—to enjoy them and preserve them at some level.”
Owen Strachan
Same Substack Article a few paragraphs later
“Put positively, (Kinism teaches that) marrying inside your ethnicity is a moral duty or a moral good.”
Owen Strachan
Substack Article
Substack Article
Yes, and we also teach that God is Holy, men and women are distinct, and the sacraments can only be found in the Church.
So shoot us already.
“I mean that the entire (Wolfe) project, unlike the NT, has little to do with the biblical gospel that unites believers & forms the one true holy nation of God (1 Peter 2:9).”
Owen Strachan
This presupposes that the one true holy nation (Church) of God isn’t a nation comprised of many nations. Strachan presupposes that the Church is going to be a globalist NWO body. In Strachan’s vision the way the Church opposes Sauron is by going all Saruman.
The Bible teaches that the Church is going to be a confederated Nation of nations. I know this because the Bible unequivocally teaches that the nations as nations continue to exist in the new Jerusalem.
“The argument made by this group (Kinists) is that failing to build the nation along ethnic lines will lead to societal chaos and even destruction.”
Owen Strachan
Ummm… Owen… Babe… Dude … have you looked out your window recently?
“(This system of thought [Kinism] strenuously opposes the Western liberal tradition and its attempt to create nations around core ideas, not family & heritage.)”
Owen Strachan
Clearly Owen has not read our founding Fathers. Again, the man is a giant idiot. The Founding of America with its Western liberal tradition was never about creating a propositional nation such as Owen Strychnine suggests here.
“Against what the world tells us today from polar-opposite ideologies, we are not divided by blood as believers.”
Owen Strachan
I suppose we likewise are not divided by genitalia as believers either Owen?
“He (Wolfe) makes gospel identity secondary and ethno-cultural identity primary. This is a reversal of the biblical framework, which recognizes our status as Jew or Gentile (covenantal categories first, ethnic categories second), but puts our shared identity in Christ at the foreground. We are “one new man” in Christ (Ephesians 2:15); we are not tribalists or ethno-preservationists.”
Owen “The Idiot” Strachan
Similarly, following “The Idiot’s” example we could write;
“We are one new man in Christ (Eph. 2:15); we are not men or women or gender-preservationists.”
On behalf of all Kinists everywhere I would like to offer gratitude with all sincerity to Owen Strachan, Doug Wilson, Toby Sumpter, Jon Harris, Stephen Wolfe and numerous others who have done Kinist the favor of either so hyper-ventilating about how dangerous we are or having written and spoken in such a way that you are accused of the Kinism that you yourself say you loathe that more and more people are becoming aware of who we are. You folks alone, have raised the Kinist brand and profile in ways that we could have only dreamt. So, from the bottom of our hearts, we thank you and we want you to know what a deep affection we have for you given all your kindness to us.
Love to all,
Pastor Bret
“We are one new man in Christ (Eph. 2:15); we are not men or women or gender-preservationists.”
And of course, when applied to class issues, or issues between masters and servants, which (besides sex and race) is the third basic division amongst fallen mankind, this kind of naivë and/or malevolent “we are all one” rhetoric leads… yes you guess… to Communism.
“We are new people in Christ, we not rich or poor or property-preservationists.”
Why should devout Christian believers selfishly hold onto their private goods? Many shady sects in the history of Christendom have asked that question, and they could even point to some seeming Biblical evidence to support them, like the semi-Socialist early apostolic commune.
Bogomils
Paulicanism
Cathars (Albigensian)
Anabaptists