Wilson’s Interview With Carlson Reveals Pope Doug Is A Neocon

After watching the full interview between Pope Doug the Wide and Tucker Carlson I have some impressions;

1.) Doug absolutely had his head handed to him. If I were Doug I would not have posted that interview because it was so decimating to his cause.

2.) I’ve noticed that Doug seems to melt down before those who he believes has “gravitas.” I remember Doug debating Christopher Hitchens on Atheism on a TV tour and I kept yelling at the screen at Doug because he was letting Hitchens get away with all kinds of stuff he had no business getting away with. Doug was almost tepid … even shy in responding to Hitchens. I noticed the same personality evacuation in Doug’s interview with Tucker. The swaggering Doug Wilson, who has no problem eviscerating those he thinks are beneath him (I know … I’ve been on the receiving end of that attempted evisceration) suddenly melts as if he is intimidated by those he knows can harm him. Maybe it is not that Doug is intimidated. Maybe he is trying to just be careful with someone he knows is dangerous? Maybe he is just being polite? Whatever it is, the Doug Wilson who is in conversation with a Christopher Hitchens or a Tucker Carlson is a different Doug Wilson who is attacking a Bret McAtee or a Michael Spangler.

3.) Tucker apologized profusely for saying at the Charlie Kirk lollapalooza memorial that he hated Zionists. He then went on to say that we should not hate anyone. Doug clearly agreed. I wonder if Tucker would apologize for saying, “I hate Satanists.” There remains a ridiculous strain of thinking in our Christianity that insists that hate is always wrong all the time. It is not. Inasmuch as Zionists are evil (and remember Zionism is naught by Notseeism for Bagels) in that much they should be hated. Now, of course Zionists might be do comparatively good things (Like Notsees). They doubtless love their mothers and treat their children well. However, when we say “I hate Zionists” we are not saying that Zionists never do anything praiseworthy. We are saying that the ideological/theological foundations of the Zionist worldview requires, out of love to God, a determined hatred. To not hate Zionists, or any belief system that dishonors Jesus Christ, is a hatred of the ascended and ruling Jesus Christ.

4.) Doug found himself in the position of defending the Bagel state in its bombing of schools, hospitals, and Christian Churches. Doug found himself in the position of defending Bagels murdering children in the was in the West Bank. Doug tried to blame all that on Hamas and as unfortunate collateral damage. Doug even tried to invoke Augustine on his side. Tucker was having none of it. Tucker insisted that there is all the difference in the world between besieging a city in the OT resulting in the population inside the city being starved out (a point Doug brought up) and pinpointing a dropped bomb to land on top of a Christian church full of refugees. Tucker kept insisting that Israel was making war on the civilian population which is a different proposition then civilians being killed in the context of battle.

Doug also suggested that it was legitimate to drop bombs on Christian churches in Gaza if Hamas has tunnels underneath those churches. Again, Tucker was having none of it insisting that if a Christian nation is the nation that is giving you the bombs which to drop you do not get permission to drop bombs on Christian churches.

5.) Doug insisted that Israel had a grizzly bear by the ears. Tucker agreed. Neither one of them asked the question … “Why did they grab the grizzly bear to begin with?” Remember, the Bagels showed up in Palestine and forcefully took Palestine from the Grizzly Bear. We shouldn’t be surprised if three generations later the Grizzly Bear takes exception to someone holding it by its ears. None of this is to say that Hamas is righteous, or even that Hamas should be given back the land illegally seized from the Palestinians. It is merely to say that if Israel as a Grizzly by the ears it is because they grabbed the Grizzly bear to begin with way back with the return to Palestine… a return of those who, genetically speaking, are likely not even Bagels, at least in their majority.

6.) Tucker clearly is no fan of Evangelical preachers.

“The people who lie the most are Evangelical preachers.”

Tucker Carlson to Doug Wilson.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but the above doesn’t recognize that Reformed preachers are not technically Evangelical and as such the true statement would be “The people who lie the most are Reformed preachers.” Tucker then launched into a diatribe against clergy that have an all paid trip to Israel and then who come back and are all aglow with reporting on the glories of Israel. I couldn’t help but wonder if Doug was sitting there perhaps feeling cut by that remark since his chief Lieutenant, Rev. Toby Sumpter, had, not long ago, arrived back in the States after an all expense paid trip to Israel and arrived back singing the praises of Israel.

7.) Doug Wilson spent more than a few minutes defending the US dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan. Tucker ate him for lunch reminding Doug that the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki was dropped using the largest Christian Church and its steeple as the target focus. The putative Christian US Military did in 9 seconds with the destruction of Japanese Christianity, what the Japanese had not been able to accomplish in the previous 250 years. And that happened despite the fact that the terms of surrender that the Japanese finally signed were the same terms of surrender they had agreed to sign 6 months prior to the bombs being dropped. (See Hebert Hoover’s “Freedom Betrayed.”) What was interesting here is that Doug admitted that his views on this subject have changed, as in years past Doug would have agreed with Tucker. This signals to me, as combined with Doug’s strong support for Israel, that Doug’s worldview has tacked in a neo-con direction over the years. Doug is no longer a reliable voice for Biblical Christianity but has instead reinterpreted his Christianity in a neo-con direction.

8.) Both agreed that antisemitism is evil but neither bothered defining what antisemitism is or gave examples of antisemitism. This is important when we live in a climate where merely saying that “We have no interest in Israel’s wars” is greeted with shouts of “antisemitism.” Clearly, the word “antisemitism” has, in the majority of its usages, merely the purpose of poisoning the well of the conversation. Once that word (or other words like that … “racist,” “bigot,” “misogynist,” “Kinist,” “homophobe,” etc.) is used the person hurling the toxic pejorative automatically wins the conversation unless the person on the receiving end says something like… “you say that like it’s a bad thing,” or, “why thank you but flattery will get not help you in this discussion.”

9.) Tucker mentioned that Israeli cabinet members have said they would like to kill all the Palestinians. What people don’t realize is that this is not an atypical view for those shaped and influenced by the Talmud which teaches that kind of attitude towards not just Palestinians but is a Bagel attitude towards all Goyim. Michael Hoffman in a blurb teasing a podcast on this subject has said;

“To safeguard civilians in occupied Palestine and the Middle East, and for the advancement of human rights and knowledge in defiance of cancel culture, the influence and impact of Talmudic theology on the Israeli government, military and the settlers must become known and challenged by all people of good will. In studying Israeli violence, confining the analysis mainly to “settler-colonialism” seriously limits authentic understanding of the roots of the racist, ethno-supremacist forces at work.”

10.) Doug tried to glibly defend the fact that 90% of US Congressman take money from AIPAC by saying, “they take money from everybody.” Tucker, responded by saying; “Perhaps but if you notice AIPAC doing that you’re instantly called an anti semite.” (Doug also forgets that AIPAC isn’t required to register as being a foreign agent unlike all other foreign agents — another strange perk that Israel gets here.)

Over and over again in this interview Doug tries to defend Israel against Tucker Carlson’s common sense observations touching on how Israel is dominating the US in its policy and in its culture. Doug is a Evangelical neo-con.

11.) Tucker interestingly said;

“Almost all of our foreign policy winds up disproportionally killing Christians.”

This is because the US Government in DC is a main arm of the New World Order and there is no one that the New World Order hates more than Christians.

12.) Doug tries to argue that Israel, unlike the Palestinians, is virtuous enough to be hypocritical about their sins and so deny their brutalities vis-a-vis the Palestinians who just own their slaughters. Tucker disagreed by insisting that what Israel does is to manipulate the US media since they are so dependent upon US aid. In essence Tucker is saying here that Israel is not hypocritical so much as practitioners of the art of distraction via the US media (which the Bagels largely own).

We could go on from here but it is pretty clear throughout the interview Doug was seeking to be an apologist for Israel even going so far as to ridiculously say;