“We further deny the right of the Christian magistrate to engage in persecution, suppression, or the disenfranchisement of citizens on the basis of religion (see the language of WCF 23-3 quoted above).”
Partial Report of the PCA Ad-Interim Committee on Christian Nationalism
1.) Forbidding the Christian magistrate to engage in persecution suggests that it would be wrong for the Christian magistrate to visit consequences upon those who break laws against Mormons practicing polygamy, against Hindus practicing widow burning (Sati), against Muslims practicing honor killings of faithless daughters, against Dearborne Mich, Muslim magistrates for implementing and collecting the Jizya tax upon Christians in Dearborne.
2.) Forbidding the Christian magistrate from suppression would mean that the Christian magistrate could not send illegal immigrants back to their country of origin if they claimed religious exemption since that would definitely be a suppression.
“We affirm that in God’s providence, liberal political orders—of the kind that have shaped America—have secured genuine goods, including protections for religious liberty, limitations on arbitrary political power, recognition of human dignity, and the expansion of certain civil and political rights. Christians should not embrace reactionary alternatives that sacrifice justice, liberty, or charity.”
Partial Report of the PCA Ad-Interim Committee on Christian Nationalism
Yes, the protection of religious liberty has given us Mosques in Dearborne, Mich., incredible fraud in Somali Minneapolis, Roaming Holy Cattle in Frisco Texas, and United Nations citizenry in Lewiston-Auburn Me. to name only a few results of the protection of religious liberty.
Limitations on political power? Like covering up the Epstein files? Like committing to war without Congressional approval?
Recognition of human dignity? Like 1 million aborted babies every year since 1973?
Expansion of civil and political rights? Like the Marxist unconstitutional civil rights legislation?
These guy are wearing blinders.
“Nevertheless, we deny that the ordo amoris provides a warrant for the preferential treatment of one’s own ethnic group ahead of any other. We further deny the assumption that our natural preferences are the same a rightly ordered loves, or that race or ethnicity may, in any way, function as a moral norm directing or defining love for neighbor.”
Partial Report of the PCA Ad-Interim Committee on Christian Nationalism
1.) Translation – The ordo amoris is to be embraced except when we say it is not be embraced.
2.) Of course this is only true for White people. Everyone except white people can give preferential treatment to their own ethnic people group. This was proven by Irwyn Ince’s whole 2025 PCA GA where a dinner and fellowship gathering was advertised specifically for “Black worshipers.”
3.) The ordo amoris applies to Fathers providing for their family but it does not apply on a scale beyond that. If heads of household have extra money to help people the ordo amoris cannot be a tool used to decide who to help.
4.) I wonder how they square this with Paul’s love for his own people stated in Romans 9:1-3?
5.) That last sentence in bold type could only be written by egalitarians. The gist of it is that all peoples must be treated equally. We are not allowed, per the PCA, to prioritize our people group. At least whites aren’t allowed to do that.
This is all to valorize the replacement of white people. This is to the end of making sure that your natural in group always remains an out group.
All this orchestrated confusion will be cleared up very shortly when the Noahide laws passed in 1991 are enforced.