Critical Race Theory as Religion, and the way it Evangelizes

“In CRT every individual is to be induced with CRT. In service of this monomaniacal goal (predicated on a bad article of faith) every institution, particularly those dedicated to the production of culture, must be turned into a tool that raises a critical consciousness of race. The objective is simple. Every convertible person must be converted, and every position of power and influence must be occupied by someone whose consciousness has been awakened. Understanding this mentality makes almost everything Critical Race Theorists do immediately comprehensible, no matter how bizarre. It’s all about creating converts and installing them into positions of power where they will not have accountability (holding them accountable would be racist). They do this by seizing the means of cultural production and repurposing them to evangelize Critical Race Theory.”

James Lindsey
Race Marxism — p. 225

We are living in a time when this evangelism (actually propaganda) is ubiquitous. In the photos that come in our Alma Mater magazines that obviously go out of their way to put the only minority in a sea of white faces in the center of the photograph, to the films and TV which push inter-racial marriage and the Queer agenda, to every government agency and corporate training time with their pushing of White guilt, to 99% of American pulpits and churches implicitly or explicitly teaching that Jesus loves inter-racial churches more than he does churches that are obviously racist because their attendance is 100% white, to the push for inter-racial adoptions because that really pleases Jesus, to the sports world which refuses to hold affirmative action spots for white athletes the way the rest of the world has to follow the affirmative action paradigm in the other direction, to the ACT, SAT, LSAT, and MCAT tests that give one extra points on the test merely because one is a minority, to the law enforcement world where the lie gains traction, despite whole books proving the contrary, that Cops are especially dangerous to minorities, ad infinitum we are propagandized and evangelized into the Critical Race Theory faith.

And if that doesn’t get the job done then there is the economic threat of being visited with Cancel Culture because one doesn’t share the CRT faith. Propaganda thus moves from manipulation to coercion and extortion. Finally, if one refuses to be converted by the above means there is the final option of the modern inquisition where Mao’s maxim is applied; “power flows from the barrel of a gun.”

Oh, and let us not forget the evangelistic aspect that includes the force of law. Here we find the recommendation of one Ibram X. Kendi (born Ibram Henry Rogers) that encourages legislation to work as a evangelistic tool for CRT;

“To fix the original sin of racism, Americans should pass an anti-racist amendment to the U.S. Constitution that enshrines two guiding anti-racist principals: Racial inequity is evidence of racist policy and the different racial groups are equals. The amendment would make unconstitutional racial inequity over a certain threshold, as well as racist ideas by public officials (with “racist ideas” and “public official” clearly defined). It would establish and permanently fund the Department of Anti-racism (DOA) comprised of formally trained experts on racism and no political appointees. The DOA would be responsible for preclearing all local, state and federal public policies to ensure they won’t yield racial inequity, monitor those policies, investigate private racist policies when racial inequity surfaces, and monitor public officials for expressions of racist ideas. The DOA would be empowered with disciplinary tools to wield over and against policymakers and public officials who do not voluntarily change their racist policy and ideas.”

In all actuality this idea is a “anti-white” bill and is part of the goal to make the religion of CRT cover America.

Now, understand that it is the above for which the WOKE preachers are stumping. Every time Sumpter, or Brito, or Clark, or Wilson, or Sey, or Strachan inveigh against Christian Nationalism or Kinism or insist that “race doesn’t really exist,” this is the religion they are pushing.

Now, I freely admit that they may not be epistemologically self conscious about that but that does not negate the fact that they are CRT snake oil evangelists and so are doing the devil’s work.

A Resurfaced Technique From The French Revolution’s Terror Stage

In Revolutionary France during the time of Terror it was called denunciation;

“Denounce the crimes, denounce the criminals, a double award awaits you: the voice of your conscience, for denunciation is a virtue: and a legitimate reward, for the National Convention is just and desires that each virtuous act should be a means by which the sans culotte may improve his lot… “

December 1793 Commission Temporaire
Ad hoc revolutionary authority installed in the city of Lyon after the Federalist revolt

In China during the time of Mao’s Cultural Revolution it was called “Struggle Sessions,” or denunciation rallies. These were were violent public spectacles intended to shame and humiliate people for “wrong think.” These sessions also became opportunities for people to demonstrate their patriotism. It was so bad it was not uncommon for even children to turn in their parents, or spouses to turn in their mate.

Today in America it is called “Virtue signaling.” We see it when CREC ministers (Sumpter, Wilson, Brito, Hemmke, etc.) denounce Kinists. We see it when Dr. Moanin’ Owen Strachan denounces Dr. Stephen Wolfe for Wolfe’s support of Christian Nationalism. We see it when the Steve Hemmke denounces Darryl Dow by writing a pitiful review of a book Hemmke never read, we see it when Rod Dreher denounced Thomas Achord despite Achord’s previous kindness to Dreher’s family. These new struggle session are breaking out everywhere.

What we are finding in our current Evangelical/Reformed version of the struggle session is those who are not sufficiently WOKE, per the standards of their Cultural Marxism and CRT are denounced for their thought crimes. Usually it comes in the version of “Racist,” or “Kinist” or “Anti-Semite.” The effect of it all is to force the modern church culture in the West to align with the worldview of WOKE-ism.

The only way to triumph over this insanity is in the name of Jesus Christ and by His authority to return their denunciations and so denounce them as traitors to Jesus Christ and Biblical Christianity. By the means of the Word of God accompanied by necessary deductions from the Word of God these people need to be stopped from filling out their roles as Soviet Commissars. These thought police must be eliminated.

In the words of John Moody

“We don’t have to be “kind and gentle” to wolves, false teachers, and those betraying the church and openly compromising with the wicked.

Love them like God does, enough “to shatter their teeth” if necessary to stop their evil.”

Doug Wilson Forbids Jew Malice, But Does Not Tell Us What It Is

“Here would be a small sampling of the sorts of things that sometimes fly in our ranks that shouldn’t sometimes fly in our ranks. And even if you don’t agree with my assessments here, this at least can have the benefit of explaining my behavior to you….

Jew-malice: of all the dead ends, of all the cul-de-sacs, of all the dry holes, of all the fruitless trees, of all the clouds without rain, of all the foam on all the waves on all the oceans, of all the gin joints . . .”

Doug “The Gatekeeper” Wilson
Blog & Mablog

Of course this requires the question of what precisely is defined as Jew malice in Doug’s world? Would Doug accuse RJR of Jew malice because RJR doubted 6 Million? Is it Jew malice to recite world history of the contest between Jews and Christians? Is it Jew malice to refer to the Jews as “The Synagogue of Satan” just like Scripture does? How about all those Church Councils in history that made not nice proclamations regarding the Jews? Just exactly how does “Ditches” Doug define this “Jew malice,” because the last thing I want to do is fall out of favor with Dougie.

I mean was Luther guilty of Jew malice? Was Chrysostom? Was Augustine? Was Calvin? I can give you quotes from each of these chaps that I’m pretty sure if anyone else said what those chaps said Doug would be phoning the “Jew malice” constables. I mean, seriously, there is no way Doug would countenance John Calvin. Doug would read Calvin out of Doug’s movement.

Sucks to be Calvin.

So what about it Doug? If you are going to gatekeep the Conservative Christian armada could you please tell us precisely and exactly what counts and doesn’t count as Jew malice. We are all waiting to hear from you on this so we don’t fall out of your Eminence’s favor.

With Apologies to John Lennon — IMAGINE

Imagine there’s no ISIS
It’s easy if you try
No Infidel among us
Around us, no PC lies
Imagine all the Nations
Living for God’s Praise

Imagine there are no Marxists

It isn’t hard to do
No equality BS
And no dialectic too
Imagine all God’s people
Living as postmills

You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
I hope someday you’ll join us
And the World will then be won

Imagine no CRT
I wonder if you can
No envy or malice
The fulfillment of God’s plan
Imagine all God’s people
Conquering all the world…

You may say I’m a dreamer
But I’m not the only one
I hope someday you’ll join us
And the world will be then won

György Lukács, the Frankfurt School & Some of its Tactics & Goals

“The question is, Who will free us from the yoke of Western Civilization?”
 
György Lukács
Cultural Marxist

“I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution. A worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.”

György Lukács
Cultural Marxist

“Münzenberg, along with György Lukács and the founders of the Frankfurt School, had seen what in the West only Madison avenue seems to have learned, that language leads to action — and that control of words and their overtones can be far more effective than hand-grenades or nuclear power to force or or intimidate someone into saying “A” when he really believes “B” and that that is most of the battle. The Tinkers-to-Evers-to-Chance in this were John Dewey, cultural Marxism, and the Frankfurt school.”

Ralph de Toledano
Cry Havoc

“By following Gramsci’s lead Marcuse had managed to find a surrogate for the working class that Horkheimer had been searching for; students and minority groups. Marcuse stated that the student radicals should aim for the radicalization of university departments. Of pivotal importance to this idea was his introduction of the concept employed so successfully by Freud and György Lukács, of so-called sexual liberation as a means of social control.”

Alasdair Elder
The Red Trojan Horse — pp. 62

In post WW II America a political movement that had been around since the 1920’s began to gain leverage in America. In its beginnings it was called “The Frankfurt School,” but as time passed it began to be known as Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, or multiculturalism. The leaders of this movement began to be the gurus on American Universities and with their teachings and their books they began to have influence beyond their numbers. Names like Antonio Gramsci, Herbert Marcuse, Theodore Adorno, György Lukács, Max Horkheimer and Erich Fromm became the Generals leading a student rank and file who would accomplish the long march through the Institutions, seeking to overturn the previous identity of every Institution wherein was heard the footfall of the march. The final goal of this march was the overthrow, shredding, and destruction of every vestige of biblical Christianity that remained in the DNA of the West.

As mentioned György Lukács, was one of the early Cultural Marxists who became Commissar for Education and Culture during the short lived Hungarian Jewish Bolshevik regime that lasted for four months in 1919. Lukács complained when finally thrown out of power that the Red Hungarians mistake was that the didn’t spill blood fast enough. During his time as Deputy to the Commissar of Education in Hungary Lukács was remembered for his action in undermining traditional morality by teaching Hungarian children in government schools debauched sexuality.

In the 1920s, this Hungarian Marxist, György Lukács, set out to address a contradiction within orthodox Marxist dogma: for Marx, a society’s dominant ideology was a “superstructure,” a mere reflection of its more basic economic structure. Thus, the ruling class of capitalists who controlled the money and the means of production also created and controlled its dominant ideas. But a workers’ revolution of the sort Marx predicted could, Marx thought, only come from the subordinated class, i.e., the workers themselves. This question then arises: what will convince workers to revolt when the very ideas in their heads are implanted by their overlords? To answer this question, Lukács, in his History and Class Consciousness (1923), argued for a more subjective conception of class consciousness than the one favored by Marx. Workers (the proletariat) had to have their consciousness raised in order to muster up the appetite for revolution.
In analyzing this we note a contradiction. Marxism is a materialistic worldview. The non-material doesn’t exist. Yet, we see the Marxist Lukács here talking about the necessity to change “ideas.” Ideas are not material, as such, they do not exist.

Now I think the Cultural Marxist right about the necessity to change “ideas” but I don’t think it was consistent with their materialistic worldview. Which might explain why the classical Marxists (now called “vulgar Marxists) did not like the Gramscian neo-Marxists.

The primary goal of the Frankfurt School, of whom Lukács was a member  was to translate Marxism from economic terms into cultural terms. It would provide the ideas on which to base a new political theory of revolution based on race and culture, harnessing new “oppressed” groups (minorities, sexual perverts, feminists) to replace the faithless proletariat. The Frankfurt school was/is committed to smashing the Christian religion, and morals, It would also build a constituency among academics, who could build careers studying and writing about the new oppression. Toward this end, Herbert Marcuse-who favored polymorphous perversion-expanded the ranks of Gramsci’s new proletariat by including homosexuals, lesbians, and transsexuals. Into this was spliced György Lukács radical sex education and cultural terrorism tactics. Gramsci’s ‘long march’ was added to the mix, and then all of this was wedded to Freudian psychoanalysis and psychological conditioning techniques. The end product was Cultural Marxism, now known in the West as multiculturalism and its goal It was the hope of Lukács and the other members of the Frankfurt school to, in the words of fellow Frankfurt School member Willi Münzenberg;

“We must organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink.”