The Great Reset as Babel Redux

Last week we began to look at the Tower of Babel and the agenda behind the building of the Tower of Babel. We noted the desire for man to frustrate God’s intent for man to be fruitful, to multiply and fill the earth. Instead, fallen man decided to coalesce there on the plains of Shinar to build a City of Man with the intent of making a name for themselves.

We noted how this political agenda of making a name for themselves was not absent a religion that supported this project. That religion we saw was embodied in the Tower of Babel which was a Temple Ziggurat. It is not hard to envision that this Temple Ziggurat was at the center of the city they were building thus communicating, by way of the layout of Babel, that pagan religion was at the center of their being.

We noted that this perhaps was the first form of what would be many attempts over the centuries at Globalist Internationalism… that is the desire of man to live in a New World Order in defiance of God’s Order. As we said fallen man will always revert back to the stereotypical sin of fallen man and that is the desire to be God.

In the Scriptures we see this attempt of man to collective man to engod himself in the book of Daniel.

“The reference to the ‘Land of Shinar’ (Daniel 1:2) recalls Gen. 11:2 and the tower of Babel. Hence, Nebuchadnezzar is viewed as ‘the humanistic reviver’ of what happened at Babel.”

Thomas Schreiner
The King in His Beauty — pg. 388


If this is true then Nebuchadnezzar is the 2nd coming of Nimrod. Just as Nimrod sought to build Babel to express the glory of Man so Nebuchadnezzar builds a 90 foot gold image of himself to symbolize his own world-wide dominion. Just as God brought Nimrod’s project low in Gen. 11 so God brings Nebuchadnezzar himself low by touching him with insanity.

We should not deceive ourselves into thinking that this propensity is just an ancient phenomenon. As we noted last week this push to collectivize man such as we see here @ Babel and later in Nebuchadnezzar’s ambitions we have seen repeatedly in the age of the Enlightenment.

Vienna Conference
League of Nations
United Nations

We are living in again today as we read in Klaus Schwab’s 2020 book – “Covid-19; The Great Reset. Before I read this keep in mind that Schwab should be thought of as the Nimrod of our age. He is among the 1% and runs a thing called the World Economic Forum. Try to imagine a get together of all the important people of Babel around a table. That is what the WEF is. These are the types who go to Davos who are members of the Bilderbergers, CFR, and the Trilateral commission. These are the types who want to go all Babel again and remake a New World Order.

How do I know this?

Well, one hint is the Babel UN building in Strasbourg France. There you will find the European Union Parliament building in Strasbourg and the architecture is meant to represent an unfinished building, This building which to the eye looks unfinished is based on the painting of 16th century renaissance painter Peter Bruegel showing the Tower of Babel as the unfinished building it would have been after the denizens of Babel had been dispersed by God’s judgments. The Strasbourg UN Parliament Building looks like it is unfinished and has an uncanny resemblance to Bruegel’s masterpiece. This was not accidental.

Another hint is books being written in 2020 by the intellectual descendants of Nimrod, and the important men of Babel, and Nebuchadnezzar. Klaus Schwab as the 2
nd Nimrod recently wrote,

1.3.3. The return of “big” government

In the words of John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge: “The COVID-19 pandemic has made government important again. Not just powerful again (look at those once-mighty companies begging for help), but also vital again: It matters enormously whether your country has a good health service, competent bureaucrats and sound finances. Good government is the difference between living and dying.”

Here it is for all those who have eyes to see… in the State we live and move and have our being. The builders of Babel could not have said it more plainly … Good government is the difference between living and dying. Not God is the difference between living and dying… not the Lord Christ is the difference between living and dying…. but good government is the difference between living and dying.


Fallen man will seek to arise to the “Most High” and does this either on an individual basis such as Eve did with the fruit or fallen man will do this on a collective basis as we see here with Babel. Babel is just a pronouncement by man, in his collective expression, that he will ascend to the most high.

In both cases fallen man, in taking up God’s prerogatives will seek to dictate the meaning of meaning and so will seek to create his own reality and to provide his own salvation.

We are living in the time of the reorganization of Babel. I will provide more evidence for that but before doing that allow me to quote the Roman Catholic G. K. Chesterton where we find a blind pig finding an acorn.

“Beware of men and of movements that speak the language of Babel. Regardless of whether they are Communists or Fascists, Universalists or Deists, Socialists or Capitalists, Alchemists or Templars, Liberals or Conservatives: beware of their New World Order; beware of their “Peace in our Time”; beware of their New Age; beware of their Fraternal Harmony; beware of their Novus Ordo Saeculorum. It is merely part and parcel of that same Tower of Babel impulse which God cursed so long ago. it is merely a new sprig from the primordial root of humanism: man seizing his own destiny and making a name for himself in the annals of history.”

G. K. Chesterton

And why should all this find its way into a sermon? Well, if you’ve been in Sunday School you know the answer to that. The Calvinist draws a straight line from spiritual freedom to civil freedom. The Calvinist, because he is a spiritual free man, is the most distasteful creature imaginable to tyrants ruling apart from God’s Law.

Here we have been set free by Jesus Christ from the bondage of sin, misery and guilt. This means we are free to do what we could never do before and that is to walk in ever increasing obedience to our great King’s Law-Word. Walking in ever increasing obedience applies not only to our private lives but also to our public lives. In our public lives we will not be brought back into bondage by those Tyrants who would posit salvation as being found in the State. The State’s role is to magnify and glorify God and scripture very clearly limits the size and role of the State. The State’s role is not to seek to be an Babel institution.

We are going to soon be reading our preparatory reading. When we come to the table next week we are reminded that we are the occupants of another Kingdom with another King and another Law order. This Kingdom that we belong to is a Kingdom that is to cover the cosmos before the return of the King. All of this reminds us that we do not live as “everything inside the state, nothing outside of the state.” We are to live in keeping with the commandments of the great King and that means the active opposition to the Nimrods, Pharaohs, Ahabs and Jezebels, Nebuchadnezzars, Herods, Neros, Charles I, Robespierres, Lenins, Stalins, Mao’s and Bidens.

The Church is a great anvil that many a hammer over the centuries has been worn out upon. If the Church will but be an anvil again I’m quite willing for the hammer to fall.

What is happening before our eyes … this pursuit of what is being called “The Great Reset” is nothing but the attempt to rebuild the Tower of Babel. It is nothing but Fallen man’s renewed attempt to “make a name for himself,” by casting off God’s salvation in favor of a salvation that will be provided by the State. It impinges upon Christianity precisely because it is the Kingdom of Darkness seeking to cover the Kingdom of God’s dear son.

The signs of it being at the door are everywhere for those with eyes to see. It is not only a matter of some billionaire writing a book. Listen to the Prime Minister of Canada recently crow about it.

“Canada believes that a strong coordinated response across the world and across sectors is essential. This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change.”

PM Justin Trudeau

You may not realize it but election 2020 – an election the outcome of which is yet to be determined – is about this New World Order called now “The Great Reset.”

“The Great Reset” w/ its moronic theme of “Build back better,” is our new Babel. The Great Reset is the attempt by the global 1% comprised of putatively Jewish Bankers and their Shabazz Goy to institute a global New World Order. It is supported by everyone from that great beast Pope Francis, in Encyclical, entitled “Fratelli tutti” (“Brothers, all”). There Francis calls for greater multilateral cooperation among countries, and urges a reform of the United Nations – so the “concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth.”

In this Great Reset the goal is merely the incarnation of the goals of humanism for centuries. Included in the Great Reset is the idea of a Guaranteed Universal Income which was thumped for in the Humanist manifesto II written in 1973.

Humanist Manifesto II

ELEVENTH: The principle of moral equality must be furthered through elimination of all discrimination based upon race, religion, sex, age, or national origin. This means equality of opportunity and recognition of talent and merit. Individuals should be encouraged to contribute to their own betterment. If unable, then society should provide means to satisfy their basic economic, health, and cultural needs, including, wherever resources make possible, a minimum guaranteed annual income.

TWELFTH: We deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds. We have reached a turning point in human history where the best option is to transcend the limits of national sovereignty and to move toward the building of a world community in which all sectors of the human family can participate. Thus we look to the development of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government.

Really, there is absolutely nothing new in this “Great Reset.” You can find its tired retreaded themes in every push to overthrow God’s Kingdom since Babel. You can find it in every ridiculous novel on Utopia written from time immemorial.

Plato’s “Republic”
Thomas Moore’s “Utopia”
Colonel House’s “Philip Dru; Adminstrator”
Edward Bellamy’s “Looking Backward”
H. G. Wells – “The Modern Utopia”

It’s all there. The same themes. The same idea. The same push to Imagine there are no nations and above us only sky. It’s all there… fallen man’s attempt to throw God off His throne and to provide his own salvation. It’s all there… the idea that all for the state… nothing outside of the State. Call it the Great Reset … call it Marxism, Socialism, Fascism, Fabianism, Syndicalism, it all amounts to much the same as crystallized by Fabian Socialist and Irish Playwright George Bernard Shaw,

“I also made it quite clear that Socialism means equality of income or nothing, and that under socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed
, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live you would have to live well.”

~ George Bernard Shaw

If we love our God and His Christ… if we love our children … if we love our freedom then we have to start embracing the mindset of the dissident and the resistance fighter…. The Christian.

Another quote to show what we are up against,

Covid-19, The Great Reset, Schwab – Malleret, pp. 57-58

“It is of course much too early to depict with any degree of accuracy the
form that the societal reset will take in different countries, but some of its
broad global contours can already be delineated. First and foremost, the
post-pandemic era will usher in a period of massive wealth redistribution,
from the rich to the poor and from capital to labour.”


___

Now keep in mind that we are talking about a violation of the 8th commandment. We are talking about the Government stealing from the non 1% rich and impoverishing everyone else. You can bet the 1% won’t be losing any of their wealth. The result of this will be the elimination of any such thing as a “middle class” so that the outcome will be a have vs. have not world order. The 1% will be the farmers and the rest of us will be the cattle.

Read your history. See how this redistribution model worked in Bolshevik Russia. Read how it worked in Castro’s Cuba. Read how it worked in Mao’s China. Shoot … read how it worked among our Pilgrim fathers when they tried using it as an economic model.

Continuing with Schwab,

“Second, COVID-19 is likely to sound the death knell of neoliberalism, a corpus of ideas and policies that can loosely be defined as favouring competition over solidarity, creative destruction over government intervention and economic growth over social welfare. For a number of years, the neoliberal doctrine has been on the wane, with many commentators, business leaders and policy-makers increasingly denouncing its “market fetishism”, but COVID-19 brought the coup de grâce.

Understand when Schwab writes the death knew of ‘neo-liberalism” what the man is saying is the death knell of the very little of Capitalism that remains in our Economic structures.

It is no coincidence that the two countries that over the past few years embraced the policies of neoliberalism with most fervour – the US and the UK – are among those that suffered the most casualties during the pandemic. These two concomitant forces – massive redistribution on the one hand and abandoning neoliberal policies on the other – will exert a defining impact on our societies’ organization, ranging from how inequalities could spur social unrest to the increasing role of governments and the redefinition of social contracts.”

People forget what the Great Reset has brought in its previous incarnations. They forget Robespierre’s “Committee on Public Safety,” and its love affair with Madame la Guillotine. They forget Stalin’s Gulags. They forget Mao’s “Great Leap Forward.” They forget Pol Pot’s emptying of Phnom Penhand the mass slaughter there.

I remember. In my books I’ve been there. I see the bloody finger of Klaus Schwab and the rest of these anti-Christ vermin behind all these perfumed proposals for their “Great Reset” New World Order.
Ask the authorities of India about Bill Gates work on the Great Reset in India with his “vaccines.” The death count has been staggering. Ask about their plans to implement Trans-humanism. Ask about their plans to eliminate the White Christian people as a people.

Conclusion

The State would be the the Institution upon which the Gods ascend and descend. But as Christians we reject the God-State and continue to insist that it is only in Jesus Christ Crucified, Risen, Ascended and Ruling, that God is to be found. As Christians we will not live by the Law-Word of another King. We will not bow to the pagan Great Reset State just as our Christian forefathers have never bowed to pagan States. We will not be animated by their fear-mongering intended to stampede us into compliance. We will not listen when they propagandize and lie and so speak the language of their father the Devil. We will not inflict ourselves or our children with their vaccine black magic potions laced as they are with fetal cells. We will not obey their illegitimate orders. We will remain faithful and obedient to our Great High King wherein we find life and life abundantly.

Our orders are to fight
Then if we win
or bravely fail
What matters it?
God only doth prevail

The Servants Craveth naught
Except to serve with might
We were not told
To win or lose
Our orders are to fight.

The Strange Persistence of R. Scott Clark — III

Here I continue dissecting Dr. R. Scott’s Clark’s R2K rant against Theocracy.

Clark writes,

“It is no business of the state where I worship or how and the state has no business imposing a religion upon me or in coercing—all taxation is coercion—me into funding another religious sect (I do not use the term sect here prejudicially but neutrally since, as far as the civil magistrate is concerned, all religions are sects).”


Bret responds,


This sounds so noble. It is pure Americana. But let’s look at this closely before we salute this sentiment.


Is it really no business of the state where I worship? What if I worship in a mosque where they tell me that honor killing errant women is pleasing to Allah? Is it of no interest to the state if where I worship teaches that Allah is pleased with marrying 8-year-old little girls to grown adult men? Does the state have no interest when a synagogue is teaching from the Talmud Jesus is in hell boiling in excrement? Does the state have no interest when in worship the congregation is smoking peyote? (see Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith) Does the state have no interest when in worship marriage services are conducted marrying several women to one man? How about worship where child sacrifice is occurring? Does the State have no interest then?


You see, it is just not true that the State has no business where its citizens worship and it is not true that the State has no business in how they worship.

And does Scott really want to suggest that the monies he is taxed now do not go towards religious sects he disagrees with? What about all that money that is going to support the State humanist Churches called “Government schools?”

Next Scott tries to argue that the US Constitution is not a uniquely Christian document and while there is no doubt that the Constitution is lacking in a bold explicit affirmation of Christianity, Scott should not miss this clause,


“If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a law, in like Manner as if he had signed it . . . “


Article I, Section 7Constitution of the United States of America


Sundays excepted is in the Constitution as a nod to Sabbath laws, which in America existed because of its status as a Christian nation. Scott should be careful with his sweeping generalistic statements.


Scott then goes on to insist that the American experiment of a neutral public square and religious pluralism has worked well. Since Scott seldom looks beneath the surface he can’t see how badly this mythic pluralism has been. He can’t see how putative religious pluralism accounted for the bloody civil war where the Unitarian “Christianity” of the North murdered, raped, and maimed its way across the Christian South. Apparently, Scott can’t see how this putative religious pluralism is now ripping the country apart. I can’t force the man to see what his glasses will not allow him to see.


Scott next makes an incredible boner of a statement when he asks,

Is not one purpose of the Bill of Rights to protect our liberty from theocrats and despots?

Actually, “no” Scott that was never to be one of the purposes of the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was drafted in its original intent to protect the Liberty of the States (not individuals) from those in the Federal Government who would seek to fix a uniform Christian Denomination on all the colonies. Most of the States in their State documents were explicitly Theocratic of one stripe or another and the Bill of Rights had the intent of making it clear that the Feds were not to mess with that. The Bill of Rights on this point was drafted with the express intent of protecting the State theocracies from any Federal interference. The States liked their theocracies that Scott so consistently laments.


So, given how wrong Scott is here how can his interpretation of American History be trusted at any other point?


Scott then makes, quite without knowing it I’m sure, the case for Secession when he acknowledges the impossibility of having a state Church in our modern context in America given the presence of so many false churches.

Next Scott with hostile intent violates the 9th commandment by slandering Reconstructionists with the Federal Vision brush. The man has been told constantly that Federal Vision does not equal Reconstructionism and yet he continues with the slander. This is another major reason I really really despise the man’s theology and the fact that people actually listen to this mouth of Sauron.


I may have one more go at Clark. His R2K analysis is so head up his … armpit on postmillennialism it is difficult to keep a civil tongue in my typing fingers. If I have another go at his article it will deal with Scott’s Harley Quinn understanding of Postmillennialism.

Who’s Doing The Stabbing & Who’s Doing The Bleeding?

 “The church is being brought ethical concerns and is responding with epistemological critique. Like a man who tells you he is bleeding, and you ask, ‘How did you come to that conclusion?’”

Rasool Berry
Teaching pastor at The Bridge Church in Brooklyn


I snatched this from a John Piper article explaining why it is wrong to label people who are Critical Race Theorists are Critical Race Theorists. This is an example that Piper used as to why we should not do that. Pastor Rasool, you see, is merely complaining about racism and has no other agenda, and when we rightly label his complaint as an example of CRT then we are guilty of slander. Never mind if the analysis of his complaint is accurate.

The Church indeed is being brought ethical concerns but they are ethical concerns birthed by a mother besides Christianity. The same people who are bringing all these ethical concerns are the same people complaining about “white fragility,” “systemic racism,” and “institutional racism.” The bleeding victim these people find is always non-caucasian and the perp of the crime is always some Christian White chap.

Epistemological critique is exactly what is needed because the complaint of “fallen man bleeding” seems to be always coming from the usual CRT suspects. I heard it ten years ago when I was at a Church conclave and one of the other representatives complained about Climate Change. When I tried to pin the chap with the complaint down he answered in a hostile manner that he knew people in Bangledesh whose crops were suffering and that it was because of the White Christian in the West who wouldn’t take Climate Change seriously. Here was a scenario where a representative of the bleeding man was faulting me for asking me how he came to the conclusion that the Bangladeshi farmer was bleeding. If the Bangladeshi farmer is bleeding it has nothing to do with something that doesn’t exist (anthropogenic climate change). He just wanted me to feel guilty and so support some form of reparations.

The bleeding man, exceptions notwithstanding, right now is the Christian White man and no tourniquet can be applied to staunch the bleeding because the guy doing the stabbing is the one complaining about how he is bleeding and how unfair it is that anyone would dare ask him how he knows he is bleeding. It is a classic example of accusing others of what you are yourself are guilty of.



Of Gubernatorial Thanksgiving Policies, Wuhan, & Liberty

Gov. Logan says that the Constitution doesn’t embrace
Walking around without a cloth mask on your face
In Oregon, you’re facing Thanksgiving prison time
It seems gathering seven in your home is a crime

In California, the Governor demands masks at meals
But in the Governor’s mansion, he does what he feels
In Michigan the resident feminist Governor Gnome
Has dictated that citizens are restricted to home

In Kentucky the accidental Governor Andy Beshear
Is going all Chicken Little by stoking up Wuhan fear
In Pennsylvania Governor Wolf has closed the bars
So bodily fluids won’t travel very far

And what of Pritzker, Murphy and Cuomo
As well as the various Governor Homos?
What of Governor Janet Mills in Maine
Whose Wuhan policies suggest she’s absent a brain

Do you really believe that these Governors care
For your health, long life, and your families welfare?
Or is it that mercenary and wicked globalist elites
Are fattening their wallets by practicing Wuhan deceit?

Whether these Governors are stupid or just evil
It’s past time for a citizenry revolt and upheaval
Time to water Jefferson’s Liberty Tree
Time to remind our Tyrants that we will remain free

Church History for the Romans 13 Crowd & Application for Today

“Do you suppose that the gospel has no principles and guarantees for true liberty in terms of the different relations in state and society? Simply look at those who live in obedience to it. This is not an obedience to the arbitrary will of man, but to the will of God. In the government one honors God’s servant. It is an obedience for the sake of conscience and for the Lord’s sake: “Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, as the servants of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart.” This obedience does not submit to earthly powers in anything that goes against the commands of the Almighty. Those who submit to government for conscience’s sake, would not yield to any government when that very conscience does not allow it.”

Guillaume Groen van Prinsterer

To make this concrete in relation to wearing a mask as mandated by the Government were we to take van Prinsterer seriously as Christians we would have to discontinue wearing masks since wearing a mask goes against the commands of the almighty. Wearing a mask is sin for those who are healthy because it violates the 6th and 9th commandments. The 6th commandment because mask wearing is self-injurious and the 9th commandment because in wearing the mask we are propagating the lie that is the fake pandemic narrative.

Similarly, shutting down our business for a fake pandemic is sin because it violates the 8th commandment if only because we are allowing ourselves to be stolen from by the Government.

We would also insist that not gathering for Worship on the Lord’s Day because the State has demanded we stay at home is a violation of the 1st and 4th commandments in the context of a fake pandemic narrative. The 1st commandment because we in obeying the State we have put the state before God as God and the 4th commandment because we are refusing to remember the Sabbath.

In all these cases (Mask wearing, shutting down our businesses, and refusing to worship in Biblical Churches that are open for worship on the Lord’s Day) we are going against the commands of the almighty.