The Christian’s Relation to the Law

Dealing with a Christian who insists that we no longer have any relation to God’s Law.

_______________

Look … Christ did not redeem us so that we might walk contrary to His Law-Word. The Law’s intent is not so that by the keeping of it we can be saved. We can’t keep it as it is needed to be kept. That is why Christ came as our covenant head. Our Lord Christ fulfilled the law in our stead and because of the righteousness accounted to us we are counted Law keepers. Similarly, our covenant head, the Lord Christ, bore our penalty in our place on the Cross that our indebtedness to the Law is fulfilled as we are united to Christ.

BUT now that the law has been fulfilled for us in Christ’s law-keeping and penalty bearing we now walk in terms of God’s law. We delight in God’s law now, not as means of gaining something we do not have. We delight in God’s law now, as a consequence of being given something we could not earn or merit.

Law and grace do doth sweetly comply (agree). We can not posit Grace against law. God’s law for the Christian is gracious and God’s grace unto the Christian was due to Christ-honoring all that the law required.

So, now we study God’s law in order to more fully delight in God’s grace.

Some will contend that we have been delivered from the law and so interpret that to mean that we have nothing to do with the law. This is an unfortunate error in interpreting and thinking. The aspect of the law that we have been delivered from is the condemning aspect of the law. Because we are in Christ we are delivered from the law’s condemnation. There is, after all, therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. However, deliverance from the law’s condemnation is not equal to the idea of no longer having anything to do with the law. This is why the inspired Apostle can say that; “The law is Holy, Righteous, and Good.”

Also, consider, how could we possibly define sin that we desperately want to avoid without the law? How could we possibly know what behavior, thinking, attitudes please our great Liege-Lord apart from His Law-Word?

Praise God for His kindness to usward as expressed by giving us His Law-Word. Praise God that the Lord Christ was and remains the embodiment and incarnation of God’s Law. To properly love God’s law is to love Christ. Correspondingly a lack of love for God’s Law-Word is a lack of love for Christ.

Twin Spin From Theologian James Orr

“He who with his whole heart believes in Jesus as the Son of God is thereby committed to much else besides. He is committed to a view of God, to a view of man, to a view of sin, to a view of redemption, to a view of the purpose of God in creation and history, or to a view of human destiny found only in Christianity.”

James Orr
Christian View of God and the World — p. 4

Orr tells us here that believing in Jesus without having a biblical theology proper, biblical anthropology, biblical hamartiology, biblical soteriology, biblical teleology, (and we might add) biblical epistemology, biblical axiology, biblical ontology, don’t really believe in the Jesus of the Bible.
And herein is found the trouble with the modern Church in the West. Most of the clergy in our Reformed churches today are absolutely deaf and dumb clueless about these matters. They are not self-conscious in the least about these matters and so they end up teaching a Jesus that is a stranger to the Jesus who rules the Cosmos at the Father’s behest.

“If I were asked in what I think the distinctive peculiarity of twentieth-century Christianity will lie, I should answer that it is not in any new or overwhelmingly brilliant discovery in theology that I look for it. The lines of essential doctrine [except for eschatology as he had just admitted –BLM] are by this time well and surely established. But the Church has another and yet more difficult task before it if it is to retain its ascendancy over the minds of men. That task is to bring Christianity to bear as an applied power on the life and conditions of society; to set itself as it has never yet done to master the meaning of “the mind of Christ,” and to achieve the translation of that mind into the whole practical life of the age — into laws, institutions, commerce, literature, art; into domestic, civic, social, and political relations; into national and international doings — in this sense to bring in the Kingdom of God among men. I look to the twentieth century to be an era of Christian Ethic even more than of Christian Theology. With God on our side, history behind us, and the unchanging needs of the human heart to appeal to, we need tremble for the future of neither.”

James Orr
The Progress of Dogma — pp 353-354 (1897)

Here Orr anticipates the rise of Van Tillian presuppositionalism, Rushdoonian Reconstructionism, and Bahsenian Theonomy all sharing Orr’s insistence that all of life must be brought under the Lordship of Jesus Christ in very concrete ways. Interestingly enough, this plea by Orr was echoed over 100 years later by French Reformed theologian Pierre Courthial in his book, “The Day of Small Beginnings.” In that book Courthial argues that the Church must have a return to a consensus on the application of God’s law to all of life.

I hope that Courthial was more correct in his anticipation for the immediate future than Orr was.

Long Lost Stanzas From “O Little Town Of Bethlehem” Recovered

O corrupt town of Washington
How always thou art sly
Within thy halls move feckless creeps
Whose lips know naught but lies
And in thy dark room’s counsels
The re-occurring blight
The chains and tears combined with fears
Are put in law tonight
 
 
How stealthily, how stealthily
The freedom gift we were given
Now departs from our hearts
That legacy from heaven
No ear may hear it leaving
But in this world of sin
Where men will fight against the night
The Dear Christ is with them

Revolutionary Humanism; Out of Chaos, Order Comes

Genesis 1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. Then God said …

One way that Christianity differs from Religions and philosophies that posit that man evolved from primeval chaos is that Christianity finds chaos being structured by order so that chaos is structured from and by the God of order.

The implication of this is that for Biblical Christians when confronted with the breakdown of social order, there is a call to return to order (God’s law) to answer the questions of breakdown and revolution and so provide solution. Not so for the Religions of chaos. For the philosophies and religions of chaos, order can only be achieved by returning to chaos. Chaos in a social order is thus healed only by more chaos and Revolution. This is seen perhaps most expressly in the Mardi Gras where chaos reigns. R. J. Rushdoony explains Mardi Gras;

“The Mardi Gras is a lineal descendant of the old pagan chaos cults whereby a religious revival meant not turning to God as it does in the Christian faith, but turning to chaos, because for the cults of chaos, the source of all things was not God. They did not believe in God, but primeval chaos, and so you sought a revival periodically, annually, you had to revive society by ritual acts of chaos. Now, in Rome, it was a Saturnalia whereby a condemned convict became the king in the early days of Rome and possessed the queen, whereby everything went. Incest, cannibalism in some societies, but not in Rome. Everything that was normally forbidden was practiced. Now, the Mardi Gras is precisely a modern form of the old chaos cults, the Saturnalia…”

As a small example of this return to chaos thinking, several years ago, I attended a school board meeting that was discussing the need for sex education in the classroom. The problem that was being addressed was the increase of out-of-wedlock pregnancies and STDs among students and the solution that was being offered was to teach the students how to have “safe” sex. You see, the problem was one of chaos and the answer being offered was a return to chaos to solve the problem of chaos. It didn’t matter that I had sundry studies demonstrating that teaching “safe sex” in government schools leads to an increase in out-of-wedlock births and STDs. This is because, at a presuppositional level, the modern humanists believe that order comes from chaos and so more chaos is the answer to chaos. Out of chaos order comes.

Of course, this is the whole theory behind the boneheaded theory that is evolution. Evolution presupposes that out of chaos order comes. Evolution teaches that chaos in development leads to the order of a new species.

Van Til called this process “integration downward into the void,” with the void representing chaos. Fallen humanist man will always embrace more chaos and Revolution to deliver him from chaos because fallen humanist man believes that out of chaos order comes.

This explains our daffy culture. Sodomy becomes a problem and the solution we embrace is Transgenderism. Chaos needs more chaos so that order will come. Marriages as an institution begin to go all chaotic and so we embrace sodomite marriage in order to “stabilize” marriage. Family breakdown is everywhere and so we redefine family to include two Lesbians and their in vitro fertilized “offspring.” Integration downward into the void. Chaos breeds a return to chaos in hopes that order will emerge.

Our expectation needs to be, short of God-given Reformation that we will continue in the West to go from chaos and revolution to chaos and revolution.

The Fifth Commandment & Kinism’s Problem With Alienism

Exodus 20:12 “Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord your God is giving you.”

The fact that we are told to “Honor thy Father and Mother,” implies that there are native relationships that have priority over non-native relationships. This is the essence of the kinist argument for its position. It is fitting that I take special care for my kin as opposed to the stranger and the alien. Indeed, forfeiting care for my people so I can care for those, not my people is a direct violation of the 5th commandment.

Neither does conversion negate the reality of these native relationships and our responsibilities to them. All because I become a Christian doesn’t mean I no longer have a unique relationship and responsibility to my native people.  We  see this in Romans 9 where the converted St. Paul can still speak of his unconverted brethren

“For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my kinsmen, those of my own race…”  Romans 9:3

The reality that St. Paul still acknowledges that these native relationships existed did not keep him from also recognizing the importance of his bond with those who were, with him, “in Christ.” In point of fact, he will refer to fellow Christians also as “his brothers,” thus sustaining that the family relationships are of the highest value. If being a “brother” wasn’t a special and unique bond then the word “brother” would’ve never been used to refer to fellow Christians. In the same vein Jesus said;

“For whoever does the will of God, he is my brother and sister and mother.”

But because of this Jesus didn’t deny his unique relationship to his own mother providing for her, in keeping with the 5th commandment and the unique responsibility of the 1st born son, protection, and a home even while on the Cross.

26 When Jesus saw his mother there, and the disciple whom he loved standing nearby, he said to her, “Woman, here is your son,” 27 and to the disciple, “Here is your mother.” From that time on, this disciple took her into his home.

The idea as promulgated by many of the Alienists that somehow becoming a Christian releases one from their unique relationship to their kin, clan, and nation. It is not a great deal different from when Jesus faulted the Pharisees;

10For Moses said, ‘Honor your father and your mother’ and ‘Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.’ 11But you say that if a man says to his father or mother, ‘Whatever you would have received from me is Corban’ (that is, a gift devoted to God), 12he is no longer permitted to do anything for his father or mother.

The contact point in Alienism and the passage above is that both seek to relieve themselves of the natural obligations that obtain to kin. The Alienist is often found saying that if my family isn’t Christian then they really aren’t my family anymore. This is blended brains for thinking.

Also this alienism strikes this author as nothing short of Gnosticism. Here is an example of what I am talking about in a recent social media thread I read as coming from a garden variety Alienist;

 “Hopefully by “your people” you mean Christians, otherwise yes there is something wrong with that (prioritizing your blood family).  God calls men from every tongue and nation, so nations are not wicked, but our true kin is those in the family of faith, those who are part of the body of Christ, not unbelievers who happen to be of the same family, nation, or ethnicity or color as us.”

Do you see the Gnosticism?  The corporeal relationships that God places us in are not ‘true kin.’ Our true kin is the kin we have because we are spiritually in Christ. We are such a “new man” in Christ that the creational categories we were created with (genetics, family relationships, maleness, femaleness etc.) all are no longer real categories. The old has passed. The new has come.

This is not only Gnosticism but it is also an example of holding to the idea that “grace destroys nature,” as opposed to what the Reformed have always taught that “grace restores nature.” The Alienists consistently believe that when grace visits someone it destroys who God made them creationally in favor of who they are spiritually.  They take the “new man” language, which is supposed to designate a spiritual category and they apply it to corporeal realities. It is as if they say, “I am a new man in Christ therefore all the corporeal things that were once true of me no longer need to be considered.”For Alienists, it is as if, after one becomes a Christian, all previous blood ties no longer matter. If they were consistent they would say that after conversion their maleness or femaleness doesn’t matter.

Look, I perfectly understand that there are times when a believer will have to forsake their family for the cross. I get that and agree with that. However, it is a bridge too far to routinely say that who we are corporeally no longer matters once we are in Christ and since that is so Christians no longer have to consider family ties.