Thomas Jefferson … A Deist More Righteous Than Your R2K “Minister”

A long time ago, a government enacted a law that fined citizens for “breaking the Sabbath,” and it used language for exceptions (“work of necessity or charity”) echoing Westminster Shorter Catechism Q&A 60 (“works of necessity and mercy”).

“A Bill for Punishing Disturbers of Religious Worship and Sabbath Breakers”—”If any person on Sunday shall himself be found labouring at his own or any other trade or calling, or shall employ his apprentices, servants or slaves in labour, or other business, except it be in the ordinary houshold offices of daily necessity, or other work of necessity or charity, he shall forfeit the sum of ten shillings for every such offence.”

This was surely authored by 17th-century Puritans, right?

Nope. It was the 1786 Virginia legislature, and the bill’s author was Thomas Jefferson—that Unitarian Founding Father the Supreme Court likes to appeal to for striking down such religious laws. Keep in mind that this is the same Thomas Jefferson who in the election of 1800 was pilloried and vilified by the New England clergy who warned during that election cycle that if elected Jefferson would seize people’s bibles. Keep in mind that this is the same Thomas Jefferson who gave us “the Jefferson Bible.” This bible found old Tom cutting out every supernatural account. Keep in mind that TJ was a Unitarian at best and a raving Deist at worst. Then after you keep all that in mind, remember that Thomas Jefferson acted more biblically than your R2K minister.

Now keep in mind here that your local R2K minister insists that the kind of political action that finds legislators passing laws that are born of the Christian faith is a great sin. Legislators, per R2K, are to appeal to Natural law and not Biblical law for their attempted legislating. Can you imagine the heart attack that R2K political super-hero Sen. Ben Sasse would have over this proposed legislation?

“The Great Replacement Theory”

Called “The Great Replacement Theory,” as birthed in Halls of power
It would cover the globe in color, while the Caucasian is devoured
Created in conjunction with the honored and inspired shibboleth
That all those who hate wisdom, have a preoccupation with death

The Great Replacement theory was conceived by Mephistopheles
And delivered to his Illuminati — his somewhat mortal corporate Trustees
It was they who were charged, with creating an expanding global plan
To mix the breeds together so as to create one New World Order Man

And so the high and mighty, those counted exalted throughout the land
Gathered in their covens, to reap a black harvest concocted by black hands
There gathered was Kalergi’s shade, an inspiration to all the rest
There gathered Red-Shields, Rockefellers, and their demon minions of the West

They resolved to put the European down, to cast the white man into Hell
The only question pondered upon was “which was the appropriate spell?
Was it better to create Caucasian wars where white men would be erased?
Or was it better to spread pestilence, and famine for destruction of the race?

Better still they discerned, to kill the European slowly and incrementally expunge
We will open his borders ever wider to the alien while his birthrates steadily plunge
We will drive him into final extinction by his pursuit of erotimania sexual joy
We will work it drip by drip so that he can not distinguish between a girl and a boy

And then in the fullness of time when the European finally decides a child to conceive
We will fill her head with a preference for a marriage bed with a Tanzanian or Japanese
We will convince him that a desire for children that favor him in deportment and appearing
Is really the fruit of a desire for incest, and so a horrid and malevolent kind of queering

This Mephistopheles band of Illuminati who designed the Great Replacement theory
Included a spike in sodomy and pedo to answer “how to replace the white man query”
For good measure they included ginning up the White man’s loathing and his hate
For all his forebears achievement and all the Christian faith that made his fathers great

And so was pursued the project of the Great Replacement task by the Illuminati gay
The project to eclipse the Christian European White man into coffee colored latte
The project to forever wipe out Christendom in favor of Mephistopheles as Lord
The project to swallow the Christian European White man in the swelling pagan hordes

Darren Doane Caught Gaslighting

“I would argue to want you see yourself reproduced is incest.”

Darren Doane
Doane is the Director of “Collision”–the movie about Hitchens and Wilson

1.) Jesus Christ is said to be the express image of God (Hebrews 1:3). Is there something incestuous about the Trinity Darren?

2.) So, by that reasoning our being transformed into the image of Christ has the smell of incest about it?

But we all, with unveiled face, beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord.      II Corinthians 3:18

For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. 

Romans 8:29-30

3.) God created man in His own Image and set man in the Garden. God therefore is an incest monger by Doane’s “reasoning.”

“We don’t wish to reproduce carbon copies. We wait in anticipation to see what the Creator has fashioned. Otherwise we are backwoods, as some seem to be, looking to produce pure breeds within their line and ending up with sickly incestuous dogs only good at sniffing for birds. We ought not to want to reproduce a skin color but a godly line.”

Darren Doane

Director of Documentary on Wilson & Hitchens

1.) Unless Doane thinks there are people out there who want to reproduce with their mother or sisters he is giving us a red-herring to talk about anybody desiring to reproduce carbon copies.

2.) We are backwoods for wanting to enter into marriage and so reproduce with people who share our race, ethnicity, faith, culture, as well as many commonalities as possible? It is wisdom to contract marriage with someone who has virtually nothing in common with you?

3.) Personally, I’ve never met any blue blood royalties or Appalachian “cousins” who alone could possibly be accused of inbred. Another Doane red-herring. Does Doane really believe that the counsel to “marry within your race” is a case of “inbred?” What a Maroon.

4.) False dichotomy as preferring Godly lines over skin color. One can do both at the same time. Where are all the Godly lines that are coffee latte (remember we are looking for generation upon generation here) Mr. Doane?
Can you imagine the level of absolute lunacy it takes to say something like Doane is saying.

I swear … the disintegration downward into the stupidity void is accelerating exponentially.

SCOTUS Claims Divine Speech

“But when the government speaks for itself, the First Amendment does not demand airtime for all views, after all, the government must be able to ‘promote a program’ or ‘espouse a policy; in order to function.”

Stephen Breyer
SCOTUS Justice

9-0 ruling — Boston City Hall vs. Shurtleff

1.) Thus proving my long held contention that the Federal Government serves as the God of the Gods, taking upon itself the privilege of having all final words. The FEDS are God speaking and when God speaks nobody is allowed to promote a counter program or espouse a counter policy.

2.) This in turn proves that the FEDS support an established religion. That established religion is Statism. If the State cannot be gainsaid then the State is the god of the government and the god of social order. Freedom of religion is a myth where the State is God.

3.) If the FEDS allow some groups to speak they must allow all groups to speak but if the FEDS themselves speak then their word is the word of God.

Destroying Christianity, Christendom, Christ’s Lordship without Attacking Christianity, Christendom, Christ’s Lordship

“Narrative is central to cultural identity. The story of a nation as told by its members, and handed down to posterity, is determinative of its character, purpose, and continued existence. A folk without memory or love of their own history will not identify with their own saga. And if not, neither will they feel any particular onus to perpetuate their civilization.

The Frankfurt school and its Culture of Critique are, of course, infamous for having struck at this very thing. Conscious of the fact that Christendom could not be overthrown by frontal assault by arms nor theology, our enemies resolved to strike at the narrative of our civilization — the historic conception and expression of our Faith.”

Ehud Would

1.) Some people will rise up to defend their narrative and to rend and tear those who would attack and seek to destroy their precious narrative. That is what we are seeing with the ongoing Roe protests. SCOTUS is fixing to strike this portion of narrative / saga down and the left is rising up to defend their narrative. Would that Christians were as passionate about their narrative/story being attacked as the Left is passionate about defending their narrative from being undone.

2.) Of course what follows the destruction of the various incarnations of the prevailing narrative/story via the destruction of statuary, changing out of Institutional names, removing of art, lowering and removal of flags, etc. the next inevitable step is the removal of the descendants of the people responsible for the abundant wreckage of narrative change that has been pursued. A people who do not have a narrative incarnated are a people who themselves will not last long in terms of existence.

3.) Note the language of “frontal assault,” being abandoned by the Cultural Marxists in favor of a back door approach to tear down Christendom. Lucifer and his minions understood that they could never get away with directly attacking the Lordship of Jesus Christ, with directly attacking Christendom, with directly attacking Biblical Christianity. As such they went for the narrative knowing that if they pulled down the narrative they would at the same time pull down the Lordship of Jesus Christ, Christendom, and Christianity. This accounts for the Cultural Marxist attack on White People and their narrative. Attack White people by attacking their narrative, redefine Christianity along the way so you can continue to plead as you destroy the narrative that ‘Hey, I’m a Christian too,’ and seek to pile on the guilt upon those few white Christians who will not be moved. Voila … the end of Christendom, Christianity, and the historic carrier of the previous two … White People.

If one can view all this dispassionately (I can’t) it has been really quite brilliant the way we have been undone.

And it is the Christians who are ultimately to blame for all this with the chief amount of blame being shouldered by America’s clergy for the past two – four generations.