Coup Leader Biden’s War on WASP’s

Coup leader Joe Biden signed into law on Thursday a bill that is aimed at countering a rise in anti-Asian hate crimes during the coronavirus pandemic, saying the legislation is part of the nation’s first step toward unity.

“I believe, with every fiber of my being, that there are simple, core values and beliefs that should bring us together as Americans. One of them is standing together against hate, against racism — an ugly poison that has long haunted and plagued our nation.”

Joe Biden

Coup Leader

Do not miss what is going on in the quote above. Biden speaks of an ‘ugly poison that has long haunted and plagued our nation.” Now which people group has been around long enough to qualify as contenders for the trophy presented to those who have long haunted and plagued our nation with the ugly poison of racism? It sure as Hades isn’t the black man.  Coup Leader Biden is never going to suggest that the black man is guilty of this ugly poison that has long haunted and plagued our nation. And you know that Ole Joe isn’t referring to the Hispanic or the Asian. Pacific Islanders? People from the Indian sub-continent? Intuits from Alaska?

No, Joe has in mind White Anglo-Saxon Christians when he talks about those who have perpetrated racism as “an ugly poison that has long haunted and plagued our nation.” In doing so Coup Leader Biden is reading right out of the Critical Race Theory handbook. White man guilty of being oppressors to the oppressed Asians… to the oppressed Hispanics … to the oppressed blacks. White man guilty for being Christian.

The Government, led by the man who led the 2020 coup is legislating against the majority people group of this nation. This ruling and legislating against the majority people group in America has become a common practice. Consistent with a policy that has been going on for quite some time, we learn from furious lawmakers in Tennessee that Biden has been shipping thousands of illegal aliens into their state using the overnight hours as cover to hide his actions.  It seems that coup leader Biden has been flying and busing tens of thousands of illegals into these united States interior from his border facilities since February. He is dropping them off inside many of our cities and towns without notice or explanation.

One person who has been on top of this story for years now is Barbara Corcoran. You can find her website at refugeeresettlement.com She also has a small book that you can order and so learn what a scam the refugee resettlement program has become.

When you take just these two stories together,

1.) Biden covertly guilting of WASPs in signing Asian anti-racist legislation
2.) Biden using subversion to relocate illegals in the American heartland

and combine it with the reality that Executive Order 1395 was signed by Coup leader Biden serving to make equity mandated across the Federal Government what you find is that the Federal Government is now an agency that is doing all it can to enslave, marginalize, impoverish and even destroy the people group (White Anglo-Saxon Christians) who created this nation. Keep in mind that the political principle of equity in the Critical Race Theory lexicon is based upon the idea that white people can and should be legally discriminated against. Biden’s Executive Order 1395 means that white people can not be hired only because they are white. No other reason needed.

White people are under attack from our own Federal Government.

And when war is being waged upon you, you might consider waging war back.

Metaphorically speaking… of course.

Kinism Has Always Been Christian Orthodoxy 101

I have become convinced that one reason the modern Church hates Kinism is that it is everywhere in Scripture and in Church History. Indeed, Kinism up until 1950 or so in this country was stock in trade in the Church and followed the maxim of Vincent of Lérins inasmuch as that it has been believed everywhere, always, by all.

I am convinced this one reason why the modern Marxist church clutches at its ears and screams irrationally whenever someone stands up and says all neighbor love was never intended to be egalitarian. Below we find yet another example from a Bishop in the 17th Century Anglican Church in England.

Alienists Churchmen hate this stuff because like Poe’s “Tale of the Tell-tale heart,” they keep hearing the pounding of the heart of the Biblical Christianity that they think they have killed. However, every time someone makes a cogent case for Kinism, or every time someone demonstrates kinism from the scripture, or every time someone quotes from Church history the Alienist-Marxist goes even further mad hearing the pounding the tell-tale heart.

Enjoy the quote below from Bishop White Kennett;

“But secondly, the same Native Country is another cement of Christian Charity. It must be some instinct in Nature, because the consent of all Mankind to love their own Nation, to value their birthright and the inheritance of their Fathers. When Moses spied an Egyptian smiting a Hebrew one of his Brethren, i.e., his own countrymen; in his tenderness, he delivered the one, and out of too great indignation, he slew the other. And when he went a second time and saw two men of the Hebrews strive together, he said to him who began the assault, ‘Wherefore smitest thou thy fellow? Is he thy brother an Israelite? This may provoke God to make you longer slaves in a strange land.’ Our Blessed Savior seems to have had particular regard to the good estate of his own Nation, while he declared, that he was not sent, save to the ‘Lost Sheep of the House of Israel’; while he wept over Jerusalem, and often visited Nazareth and Bethlehem, tho one would think, nothing could draw him thither but an impulse of natural affection; for he himself was sensible that the ‘Prophet had least Honor in his own Country’. St. Paul was another great example of inbred Love and Zeal for his Native Land, the goodly Heritage of his Ancestors. He was by Birth a true old Hebrew of the Hebrews, i.e., for many generations. He had indeed but little reason to be fond of that Birthright; for he was brought into great Perils by his own countrymen, and he had least to do with them, for his Mission was to be an Apostle to the Gentiles; yet Nature must break through all discouragements; wherefore, Act xxviii.19 tho’ plagued and oppressed by his fellow Jews, he had still a loving eye upon his dear Country, ‘I was constrained (says he) to appeal unto Ceasar, not that I had ought to accuse my Nation of’; and how much less would he have betrayed his Nation? Nay, what a rapture of zeal had he, Rom ix.3 ‘I could wish myself accursed or separated from Christ for my Brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, who are Israelites.’”

Bishop White Kennet (1660-1728)
On Christian Charity — p. 20-21

Defending the Flock

Recently the oldest Law Student in America — Joel McDurmon — took out after a couple of people I love who are part of the congregation I serve. The chap who was fired by Ameican Vision for his SJW turn couldn’t resist a swipe at Arnold and Philip Jagt. The oldest Law Student in America wrote;

“Just a reminder of the racist nonsense you see in the reformed world still. The post (of McAtee) looks benign but view the comments. Mr. Jagt is Arnold Jagt’s son. We’ve posted similar racist comments from him in the past. Arnold runs pocketcollege.com and claims his views on race are no different than Rushdoony’s. The son seems to have imbibed the hate.

The Jagt family attend Mr. McAtee’s kinist church (he may use a different label). Not only do they support Peter Hammond’s views against miscegenation, they also don’t appear to think too highly of blacks in general, and apparently believe there is a black conspiracy to overthrow all whites.”

The Shepherd responds,

1.) McDurmon is a vile man filled with estrogen and bile. This attack on the Jagts is completely unwarranted.  There is no “there” there in McDurmon’s accusation. Mr. Jagt’s son is no more racist than Joel is intelligent. Mr. Jagt’s son is an industrious young man who is a machinist of top-caliber ability and who loves Christ understanding that he, like all God’s people, is a sinner saved by grace alone. Excepting my own Son there are very few young men who I would trust more than Arnold Jagt’s sons. They are budding men of God and it riles me to see this serpent in the Church take a whack at them.

2.) Joel completely misses the irony found in the hatred that is required in order to accuse someone of hate … and that with zero evidence.

3.) We must admit that in Joel’s Christ-hating worldview I am a racist … as are the Jagts … as are every biblical Christian that breathed prior to 1950 or so. In light of the publication of Achord and Dow’s “Who is my Neighbor” it takes a determined effort to suggest that there is anything in the least racist or hateful in what Christ’s Church has embraced for 2000 years.

4.) In point of fact, it is Joel who is the racist. Joel hates white Christians who are not Marxists and loves him some minority Marxists.

5.) As we consider Arnold it needs to be shouted that Arnold is one of the most generous men that I know. I personally know of a mixed-race man and his family that Arnold has repeatedly generously gifted with financial help. Tell me … does that sound like the actions of a racist? But Joel doesn’t know this and so he just continues to parade his gargantuan ignorance.

McDurmon shows his non-Christian teeth when he bars them at Arnold and spits out accusations of “racism” against the man and frankly, this pisses me off to the point that did I believe that dueling was Biblical I’d be demanding pistols at ten paces.

6.) Joel probably doesn’t like the fact that his children’s great-grandfather is R. J. Rushdoony. I note this because it really is the case that the convictions of the Jagts on race correspond almost exactly to what Rushdoony believed and wrote. However, with Joel, the son-in-law nut doesn’t fall far from the Father-in-law nut tree.

A.) Joel accuses Arnold of racism
B.) Joel’s Father-in-law (North) accused his Father-in-law (Rushdoony) of racism

It simply is the case that the Jagt’s view on race (and mine as well) echo Rushdoony’s views. There are just tons of quotes from RJR that sustain this observation.

7.) The Church I serve is NOT a Kinist church except inasmuch as Kinism is consistent with Biblical Christianity. The Church I serve is Christ’s Church.

8.) The Jagts and I don’t support Marxists of any stripe or color. That makes us haters in the book of the oldest law student in America.

9.) Peter Hammond is likewise a man of God doing all he can do to save the West from the Marxist like Mcdurmon.

10.) A black conspiracy to overthrow all Christian whites? Probably not. However, there clearly is a global conspiracy to overthrow all Christian whites. I’ll let others figure out what the source is.

11.) If you read the thread in question you’ll notice that Joel practices the point, splutter, and scream “Eek” argumentation methodology. Joel tries to cut somebody so that there is blood in the water that his useful idiot co-laborers can then come and have a shark-fest.

12.) The greatest irony of this whole thread is that someone later says that the Jagts can’t help their racism since their Dutch and as we know all Dutch are racist haters.

It is not only blacks that this family views as lower than them, but all non-Dutch people are a couple of notches below the Dutch people. The Jagts are not only Dutch, they are Dutch on steroids. They get the Kinism of both sides of the Atlantic, and the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. This is a strange family.

LOL.. you can’t make this level of stupid unconsciousness up.

Charlotte Christ the King Church, because of God’s incredible grace, is one of the greatest Churches remaining in America and the Jagts are, along with everyone else in the congregation, part of the reason why.

Joel McDurmon can kiss my Kinist arse.

The Purpose of Critical Race Theory … and its Origins

Recently, I made the point that one of the purposes of Critical Race Theory is so that the putative oppressed have the means to go from alleged oppressed status to an oppressor status. Indeed, I would insist that is the main reason for the existence of Critical Race theory is to empower the weak so that they can dominate the strong. I do not believe the CRT has very much to do with “justice” or righting previous wrongs.

In response to this one of my more articulate and educated readers responded by writing,

bruh

 

If i’m covered in 10 layers of oppression I assure you i’m not advancing in anybody’s world. Where is this black, female, gay, handicapped, poor, under-resourced person that is “ruling” over whites??????

 

stupid **6ix9ine voice

One has to keep in mind that Cultural Marxism has replaced the proletariat class with the oppressed class and has replaced the bourgeoisie with the oppressor class. The reason for this switch is the Frankfurt School (Cultural Marxists) realized that the working class (proletariat) was never going to accomplish the long march through the Institutions since they themselves realized that they could be upwardly mobile in the Christian and Capitalist system. The Frankfurt school realized that they needed a new proletariat to accomplish Revolution and that this new proletariat had to be based not on an economic foundation but on a cultural foundation. That which needed to be attacked was not so much the economic bourgeoisie as the cultural gatekeepers. Christian culture was the object of destruction.

Like in classical Marxism the intent is for the proletariat (oppressed) to eventually overthrow the bourgeoisie (oppressor). In Cultural Marxism, the tool that is used to achieve that overthrow is Critical Race theory. The difference is that now whereas in the past the proletariat was the worker class, the current proletariat is comprised of minorities, feminists, LGBTQI, disabled, and under-resourced persons who have bought into the myth that they are victims of white Christian normies. Likewise, the current bourgeoisie class is now comprised of epistemologically self-conscious white Christian normies who refuse to embrace the Marxist narrative combined with a small handful of epistemologically self-conscious minorities who likewise refuse to embrace victim status. Minorites like Voddie Baucham, Candice Owens, Michelle Malkin, Thomas Sowell, and others are paying a huge price by standing up to the race pimps and new proletariat class. Similarly, white Christians who refuse to bow are being routinely bloodied by the hatemongers and racial gargoyles.

Now it is reasonable to ask where do we find the alleged oppressed class benefiting by their oppressed status as Mr. 6ix9ine inquires above. The examples are abundant;

1.) The alleged oppressed class benefits from their oppressed status by having SAT points automatically added to their SAT scores simply because they are part of a putative victim class.

2.) The whole quota system that is now characteristic in this country has been implemented with the vision of fixing centuries of oppression. Numerous white Christian males need not apply for promotions, terminal degree programs, or career positions because they are being displaced by members of the new less qualified Marxist proletariat.

3.)  The recent massive stimulus relief package proposes to pay billions of dollars to Black farmers while leaving white farmers to go pound sand simply because they are white.

4.) All of this that is pursued by the FEDS is accomplished from taking from white Christian Peter to transfer wealth to proletariat Ximinez. In the process, the whole former notion of a meritocracy has been eclipsed in favor of the bromides of Critical race theory.

Now, these are considered “hate facts” but facts they remain. It is an absolute truth that the purpose of CRT is to displace white Christian males with the new proletariat.

This kind of thing has been pursued in the past. When the Freedman’s Bureau was established in 1866 its purpose was clearly to accomplish what CRT is being used today to accomplish — and that is to keep Christian white people impoverished with high sounding language about how blacks were going to get ahead by Freedman’s bureau policies. Instead what happened is that both blacks and whites were impoverished while the FEDS and those sucking off the FED teat were enriched.

The dirty but not-so-secret truth in these pursuits is that these pursuits seldom advantage the hoi polloi that they are supposed to advantage but they are good at lining the pockets of the race pimps and grievance mongers — the professional bitch class.

Of course, all of this is very Nietzschian. Nietzche taught that the socially weak upon becoming aware that they would never overcome the strong by strength instead opted to seize the day by pursuing the transvaluation of all values. By this method, the weak play the Lilliputians to the strength of the strong Gullivers except in this version the Lilliputians tie Gulliver down not by cords but by grievance legislation. No Christian could ever agree with Nietzsche’s solution of the Ubermensch but we can agree that Nietzsche’s prognosis of the transvaluation of all values has descended upon us.

Now to all this the oldest Law Student in America, Mr. Joel McDurmon replied with his usual depth and clarity;

“apparently believe there is a black conspiracy to overthrow all whites.”

I do not believe that there is a black conspiracy to overthrow all whites. I believe that any such conspiracy has been cobbled together by a mind that has for millenniums hated Jesus Christ and Christianity and those who have been the primary civilizational carriers of Christianity. I believe this is Lucifer’s conspiracy as implemented by those who are of their Father, the Devil. The Cultural Marxist proletariat are themselves just the victims though they think that they will achieve bottom rail on top by all this tomfoolery.

 

 

Observations on Mike Horton’s Determination to Surrender Christianity — Part I

In a recent presentation on our favorite Christian heretic site that screams everyone else is a heretic, The Gospel Coalition, gives us an interview that includes the precious insights from a little-known “theologian” named Mike Horton.

I take some time here exposing Horton’s lack and my own frustration with Horton’s lack. Keep in mind that Horton is training young men for the Gospel ministry and that what he says here is going to in turn be said in pulpits all across America.

“Islam is not an external threat in the United State to Christianity but Christian Nationalism is a Christian heresy. It is, therefore, an internal threat both to the message and the witness of the Church.”

Mike Horton

1.) I dare Mike to come to Dearborn or Hamtramck Michigan and say that first part about Islam not being an external threat to the US.

2.) Are we to wait till Islam becomes an external threat to the US before we understand that as Americans and Christians Muslims are other than us and so should be restricted from coming here?

3.) Certainly, some forms of Christian Nationalism could well be a threat to the message and witness of the Church of Jesus Christ but to say in a blanket fashion that Christian Nationalism is by definition a threat to the Church is just bull fecal matter coming out of the mouth of a Christian heterdox.
4.) We should expect someone who touts the heresy of R2K to accuse orthodoxy (and Christian Nationalism practiced in a Biblical fashion is God’s model for social orders) of being heretical.

Horton also, in the “Christian Nationalism” podcast denounces the Crusaders for splitting the skulls of infidel while confessing “Christ is Lord,” saying that in that context the statement “Christ is Lord” is not faithful.

Horton thus shows, once again, that he is an idiot and knows nothing about History. The Crusades were a defensive war against a centuries-long unanswered Muslim offensive that had, by the power of the Scimitar, conquered and vanquished the Christian message, faith, and civilizations across the formerly Christian N. African Littoral, into Christian Europe, and across the formerly  Christian Middle-East. For Horton to suggest that it was wrong for the Crusaders to defend Christianity, the Gospel, and Christendom by splitting the skull of the infidel while chanting “Iesus Christus Dominus Est” demonstrates that Horton’s Christianity is a suicide pact. Maybe Horton would have preferred the Crusaders to chant “We love you and God loves you also.”

Horton here also violates the 5th commandment (as well as the 9th commandment) by running down his fathers in the Faith — the Crusaders.

As we move on in this interview we find this gem of an exchange;

Moderator: Let me ask a clarifying question, Mike. Would you say that Nationalism itself is a threat to the Gospel or only Christian Nationalism?
Horton: “If Nationalism is the idea that we have to be Americans more than anything else then yes it is a threat to Christianity. We are Christians more than anything else which means we are united not only here but with our brothers and sisters around the world and that is our first family.

BLMc responds,

1.) Clearly, Biblical Nationalism would never prioritize one’s home over one’s faith if that was the ultimate choice. To prioritize our homeland when in error over Christ would be idolatry. No Christian who advocates for Biblical Nationalism would ever place Christ over family and home when family and home are against Christ.

2.) I would say our first family is our blood family who is united with us in Christ. Horton posits a dichotomy between nation and faith that at times might exist but certainly isn’t necessarily the norm. St. Paul in Romans 9:3 gives us an example of what I am talking about.

“For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my people, those of my own race…”

Here Paul says of his blood kin what he says nowhere else about other Christians who are not his blood kin. Obviously, there is a kind of Nationalism we see here coming from St. Paul — a Nationalism that Mike desires to summarily dismiss as being heresy.

3.) Horton keeps decrying Nationalism but allow us to ask what other social-order form does Mik recommend? Internationalism? Marx would be happy. Empire? Empires don’t have that great of a Historical track record — especially if you belong to a people on the bottom of the Empire. The social order Mike wants because of his R2K theology is some form of pluralism or multiculturalism. Horton’s R2K forces him to denounce nationalism because R2K presupposes a social order common realm where peoples from all different faiths and origins are cheek by jowl.

4.) Fortunately, Biblical Nationalism doesn’t mean being an American before being a Christian. Biblical Nationalism, contra Mike, doesn’t mean “My country right or wrong but still my country.” That is more “Murica Bear-ism and not Biblical Nationalism.

Elsewhere Horton suggests that Christian Nationalism by necessity inverts the Old Testament by viewing Israel as presaging America as opposed to pointing to Christ. While certainly, that might be true of some versions of non-Biblical Christian Nationalism it is by no means true of all  Christian Nationalism that is Biblical.

Horton is already showing a habit of taking Christian Nationalism in its worst expression and making that the norm so that all Christian Nationalists are, in Horton’s book, “Murican Bears.”

Horton in this interview talks about how heresy is parasitical upon the Christian faith. He says heresy twists the Christian faith. Of course, he is correct but I find myself listening with jaw agape wondering if this man understands nothing of irony. Horton and his whole R2K school of “thought” is a parasite upon the Christian faith and here his Horton talking about heresy as parasitical on the Christian faith.