“Woke,” “wokeism,” “wokeness,” “wokery,” “Cultural Marxism,” “political correctness” are deceptive nomenclatures employed for concealing the facts about the Jews and the Frankfurt School.
The Frankfurt School, disproportionality staffed by Jews, adapted Karl Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was twofold. First their goal was to reshape the subconscious of Western (white) men and women and thus create a new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds, even to the point of supporting positions that would eventuate in the destruction of the Christian faith and the Christian White man. This brings us to the second goal of the Cultural Marxist which was, in the words of Cultural Marxist, Willi Munzenberg;
“We must organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat”
They achieved this via their long march through the Institutions. Cultural Marxism, via the messaging of Government schools and Universities, Media outlets of all varieties, and the “Christian” church championing a false Christianity using false guilt in order to re-orient the hoi polloi concerning right and wrong and good and bad. Together they created the new Western Soviet man by instilling in Western man a false consciousness that might be rightly called, “A Will For Death.”
Cultural Marxists (the rank and file of the Frankfurt School) encourage Zionism, abortion, birth control, divorce, LGBTQ, “carrier women,” with its attendant feminism, drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family via sexual promiscuity and perversion, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. All of this is derivative of and reflective of what the Cultural Marxist’s preach:
1.) White reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
2.) Christian White culture is oppressive and bad and that which breaks up and destroys Christian white culture is good.
Cultural Marxism is the driving ideology that explains the death of the West. If Biblical Christianity is that cultural faith that was turned away from, the Frankfurt School, with its Cultural Marxism, is the cultural faith that was turned to and embraced. Most of your conservative Christian clergy that you will meet today have reinterpreted their Christianity through a Cultural Marxist grid. People like Doug Wilson, James White, Kevin DeYoung, Jeff Durbin, Andrew Sandlin, R. Scott Clark, Mike Horton, J. V. Fesko, David Van Drunen, T. David Gordon, and many many more, to one degree or another, given their opposition either to a decidedly Christian Nationalism or their support for Zionism, or their support and/or encouragement of prolific miscegenation, are all drinking from the well of Cultural Marxism. If this continues the continued steep decline of these united States will continue apace. If this continues the Christian faith and the Christian Church will be found only in remote and tucked away places.
One thing I don’t understand- how did marxism work on the churches as an institution and individual believers when it’s only a worldview? In my thinking, it’s winning because Christians weren’t convinced of marxism in their minds, but because we’ve lost the will to fight, but marxism attacks our minds, not our will.
R2K guys, they have a will to fight a bit, they fight Christians to their right, but only with weak articles and sleepy emotive sermons.
It’s not so much marxism won, but Christians shrank and those with the most energy are filling the vacuum.
I’d say comfort made us soft, we became uncertain in our beliefs, and the uncertainty disables our will power and marxism takes advantage of it. Eg, “that Apple of equality is surely something good, eat and be as kind as God.”
Hello Kurt,
Marxism won out because Christians sent their children to Government schools. When those children eventually came back to the Church (if they did come back) they came back and reinterpreted Christianity through a Marxist grid and so the Church likewise became infected with Marxism. The clergy likewise were never presented Marxism as a worldview and so had/have ZERO ability to recognize it and label it in themselves or in the Church. Cultural Marxism is the air we breath and the water we drink. It takes a whole ton of work to get out of the cultural milieu in order to identify it.
Just as I imagine our weakness carried out in the 50s by Christians shrinking and running from McCarthy and the red hearings, just so, I’m seeing conservatives shrink back against the deportations due to their feelings at photos or videos (ie, they obey the media narrative). Why do Christians believe winning a fight should be easy? Because of Jericho? Casting out of demons in an instant? Those things did happen, but we have a destructive aversion to winning ugly and messy.
Hey, you got a trans or gay kid? The Christian formula is have an elder have a one hour conversation with the kid, tell the parents you are praying for them, the parents tell the kid we are all sinners and they love them very much, then live as normal with the only plan being that the gay/trans issue disappears by itself as the parents l8ve terrified that the relationship would end or a bridge be burned. Same thing, substitute gay for marxism.
This is spot on.
Thanks Kurt.
P.S. — I have seen this play out over and over again in families.
“If this continues the Christian faith and the Christian Church will be found only in remote and tucked away places.”
You might have written: “If this continues the Christian faith and the Christian Church will [continue to] be found only in remote and tucked away places.”
“The great ideal of Judaism is not that Jews shall be allowed to flock together one day in some hole-in-the-corner fashion for, if not tribal, at any rate separatist objects; but that the whole world shall be imbued with Jewish teachings, and that in a universal Brotherhood of Nations—a greater Judaism in fact—all the separate races and religions shall disappear.” -Jewish World, London 1883.
Fr. Leonard Feeney, quoted in ‘The Jewish Plan to Destroy Christianity’, The Point, Nov. 1956
Great quote Ron.
Sadly enough your observations are correct.
In the second paragraph you wrote of the “destruction of the Christian faith and the Christian White man”. Part of the problem today is that most evangelicals (among whom I was raised) would contend that there is not and never was such a thing as “the Christian White man” -just individual White men who chose (via free will) to become Christians, the same as any color of man might do if he were so inclined (or rather, if he inclined himself to cooperate with common grace instead of using his human will to frustrate the will of an omnipotent God)…
The typical modern Christian thinks God does not deal with nations, but only with individuals, with the exception of the ethnic Jews who get a pass to reject him and violently repossess Palestine from which he vomited them out, and who still get carnal (and maybe even spiritual) favors from God to the literal end, favors that overmatch those given to the martyrs of Jesus Christ from Stephen down to the Reformation. It would be comical if it were not so wildly heretical.
The Arminian rejects the significance of his race, by claiming God does not deal with nations, and rejects the significance of his family/recent ancestors, by claiming a non-existent free will and a rejection of the covenantal nature of salvation in a Godly line. He has become just an individual, floating in a sea of multi-colored individuals, with no past, no special connection to kin, with each individual serving as their own god/means of redemption. It is a devilish system.
This is really good Joe.
Thanks for making the connection between Arminianism and Alienism. I might expand on this.
The pagan origins of atomistic individualism lie in (well, duh) the atomistic materialism of Democritus and Epicurus. The humanistic worship of “free will” that can be seen among Arminians could be seen as its “Christian” component or counterpart, or a way to baptize individualism, which in itself is not a very pious worldview, with Biblical-sounding jargon.
The first time a Christian population came under (proto-) Cultural Marxist rule was in the 1790s revolutionary France:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dechristianization_of_France_during_the_French_Revolution
French Christians lived under effective “dhimmitude” during those years, as the government was able to tolerate the existence of those believers who bowed down deeply enough to the new system (while those who did NOT, could be outright genocided, like in the rebellious (or counter-revolutionary) Vendée province):
“In July 1790 the National Constituent Assembly published the Civil Constitution of the Clergy that stripped clerics of their special rights—the clergy were to be made employees of the state, elected by their parish or bishopric, and the number of bishoprics was to be reduced—and required all priests and bishops to swear an oath of fidelity to the new order or face dismissal, deportation or death. French priests had to receive papal approval to sign such an oath, and Pope Pius VI spent almost eight months deliberating on the issue. On 13 April 1791, Pius denounced the constitution, resulting in a split in the French Catholic Church. Over 50% became abjuring priests (“jurors”), also known as “constitutional clergy”, and nonjuring priests as “refractory clergy”.”
I know what you mean here Viisaus but Cultural Marxism didn’t come along until the early 20th century with Antonia Gramsci and the Frankfort school. However, what happened in France looked a great deal akin to what the Frankfurt school developed later.
Some of these French priests who swore loyalty to the new order could become such devoted defenders of the Jacobin cause that even Josef Stalin (who became an apostate former seminarian himself) could admire them:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninety-Three
“Ninety-Three (Quatrevingt-treize)[1] is the last novel by the French writer Victor Hugo. Published in 1874, three years after the bloody upheaval of the Paris Commune that resulted out of popular reaction to Napoleon III’s failure to win the Franco-Prussian War, the novel concerns the Revolt in the Vendée and Chouannerie – the counter-revolutionary uprisings in 1793 during the French Revolution.
…
In Paris, Danton, Robespierre and Marat argue about the threat, while also sniping at each other. They promulgate a decree that all rebels and anyone who helps them will be executed. Cimourdain, a committed revolutionary and former Roman Catholic priest, is deputed to carry out their orders in Brittany.
…
Joseph Stalin read Ninety-Three as a young seminarian in Georgia and the character of Cimourdain, a former priest, “made a deep impression” on him.[3]”