A Word To Kinists
1.) Let’s be clear here. What Stivason, following Poplin, would have us to believe is that races should intermix and not remain in their allotted boundaries set up by God. This follows the clearly articulated belief system of the Marxists and cultural Marxists, who have likewise articulated this very same belief.
2.) It does not necessarily follow that all because someone believes that races should not intermix and should remain in their allotted boundaries therefore the person believing that premise also believes in racial superiority. That is a non-sequitur by both Stivason and Poplin.
3.) What could be the case instead is that Kinists believe that superiorities and inferiorities are present in all the particular races and as that is so those superiorities and inferiorities should be respected.
4,) Notice how we begin with Kinism and soon enough we learn that Kinism is a synonym with race realism. This is contrary to the ARP report which defines Kinism and race realism very differently at the beginning of the report. It seems these chaps can’t get their definitions down.
5.) The Apostle Paul clearly thought the Jews were superior to other peoples. Listen to how he speaks,
What advantage then has the Jew, or what is the profit of circumcision? 2 Much in every way! Chiefly because to them were committed the [a]oracles of God.
In having the advantage over the Gentile Paul is saying that the Jews were previously superior because they had the oracles of God.
