Dr. Strange and the Multicult of Madness — Part V

“Inside our personal information bubbles, our assumptions, our blind spots, our prejudices aren’t challenged, they are reinforced and naturally, we’re more likely to react negatively to those consuming different facts and opinions – all of which deepens existing racial and religious and cultural divides.”

Barack Obama

Here we return to the final installment critiquing Dr. Alan’s Strange’s excoriating of Christian Nationalism (CN).

I open with the quote above because Strange at the 12:17 mark of his third installment on the subject says much the same thing. I can’t help but find it interesting that a putative conservative Reformed theologian agrees with a Marxist like Obama on critiquing the reading habits of Americans.

1.) It seems that Strange is trying to pry Christian people away from having convictions that he personally doesn’t like and so he says, “read from sources that don’t agree with you.” Now, I don’t have a problem with reading broadly. Indeed, I often read my enemies because in such a way I can more easily disembowel their arguments. However, this isn’t why Strange (or Obama) want you to read outside those who agree with you. Strange wants Christians to read outside of those who agree with them because only in such a way will people be pried away from positions that Strange doesn’t like.

I would encourage people to read broadly but only after they have anchored themselves in a Christian World and life view.

2.) Strange insists that “we have to put politics in its place,” but he does so via his own political jeremiad that insists that everyone salute his politics. Strange’s politics insist that Christians should not prioritize politics. The problem here is that the enemies of Christ has politicized everything. It is the enemies of Christ who have politicized life, sex, and death. As Christians are we not to respond to this pagan politicization by entering into the political sphere by pushing back? The enemies of Christ have taking politics as their theology and by the means of politics they seek to cover the globe with their anti-Christ theology. For Christians, at this time, to put politics in its place the way Strang envisions is to surrender the whole ball of wax. The consequence of Strange’s version of “putting politics in its place” is to be forced back into the catacombs. The consequence of Strange’s version of “putting politics in its place” is the final hegemony of polluted pietism in the place of a muscular Christianity that walks uprightly in the public square. The consequence of Strange’s version of “putting politics in its place” means that Jesus Christ takes a back seat to whatever god or gods is/are running the public square. I submit to you that Strange, however well intended the man may be, is issuing a call to treason against Jesus Christ.

3.) Strange pulls, the now tired claim, that CN is just WOKEism on the right as if ideas of CN or race didn’t long predate the rise of WOKEism. This claim, now made by many, is just idiotic.

4.) Strange makes a typical R2K move by insisting that Christians must return to the “spirituality of the Church,” where spirituality means “surrendering to the anti-Christ forces” in the culture wars. Strange, it seems to me, will only be happy when Christianity is not a force at all in the public square, when Christianity will be restricted to what happens during Worship on Sundays, when Christianity is publicly irrelevant. The man is petrified by the notion that Christianity may become once again militant.

Look, at the end of the day, the Christianity that Dr. Alan Strange is hawking is a different Christianity from the likes of John Knox or Puritan Pulpiteers in colonial American history. It’s not a Christianity in which I am interested. I find it to be cowardly and dishonoring to the Lordship claims of Jesus Christ.

Andy Sandlin’s Cryptic WOKEism

“The great divisions among humanity are never racial (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White), sexual (man, woman), economic (rich, poor) geographic (urban, rural), intellectual (educated, uneducated), or national (West, East), but ethical (covenant-keeper, covenant-breaker).

The great strategy of rebellious man is to posit the division anywhere but the ethical.”

P. Andrew Sandlin
Legend in his own mind
 

The fact that the great division, religiously speaking, is between covenant breakers and covenant keepers in no way diminishes other distinctions as Andy’s post implies. The fact that these very really distinctions are turned into divisions is indeed the consequence of sin as sin introduces a conflict of interest motif vis-a-vis a harmony of interest motif that one finds in the Christian faith. However, this does not mean that the distinctions turn into irrelevant realities upon conversion. Upon conversion men remain men and women remain women. Upon conversion the different races remain the different races and the different socio-economic classes remain the different socio-economic classes. One doesn’t get extra IQ points simply because one converts and so distinctions remain between the education and uneducated.

Because this is all true we would have to say that the great strategy of the stupid and rebellious man is to try and make these distinctions go away by blaming those who take these realities seriously as being rebellious. Most Kinists believe that one day the whole world, or at least much of the world will be converted. However, even in that happy day men and women will be distinct, the races will be distinct, geographic origins will still matter, IQ differences won’t disappear and national differences will remain. And all that is true when the ethical anti-thesis goes into abeyance because all men gladly bow to Christ as Lord of Lords.

Kinists understand these distinctions exist. Kinists understand that religiously speaking the great division is ethical. However, Kinists do not go all Gnostic by suggesting that grace destroys nature.

In the end what Sandlin is ultimately denying is the theological meaning intrinsic to Creation, not to mention missing that Scripture regularly sets forth principles and laws as predicated upon Creational realities. This is something these never to be wise men do with alarming frequency. They can’t understand the distinction between creation and redemption.

Critical Race Theory #1

Critical Theory

A methodological tool developed by Cultural Marxism that has entered into numerous fields so that we can speak of Critical Legal Theory, Critical Educational Theory, Critical Race Theory, etc.

We will be considering Critical Race theory during this series though that will be necessity bleed into these other areas.

We do so because CRT, known also as Race-Marxism and neo-Marxism and Western Marxism has become the 800 pound guerilla worldview competing against Biblical Christianity in the West.

We will see, eventually, that Race-Marxism is a competing religion with all the components that one will find in any religion.

Beginning we note that Critical Race Theory (CRT) can simply be defined as a ideological/theological theory that presupposes and so is based upon conflict of interest theory that categorizes people into “oppressed vs. oppressor” categories in order to advance a revolutionary agenda whereby power is shifted and so queered away from heteronormativity, white, and Christian people so that sexual perverts, non-Caucasian, feminists, Academics, and anti-Christ people are empowered.

If we were to use the words of Scripture CRT is the organized and allegedly  systematic attempt of the enemies of Christ to call evil good, and good evil; to put darkness for light, and light for darkness; to put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

Continuing to move along definitional lines, it needs be understood that CRT is a ideological/theological movement pushed by activists and putative scholars interested in studying and transforming the relationship among race, racism and power. It is key to understand here that there is no such thing as CRT that is only a philosophy.

CRT advocates embrace Marx’s maxim that

The task is not just to understand the world but to change it.”

So, there is no such thing as CRT that isn’t attempting to overthrow what little remains of Christian norms that have created the West.

We need to keep in mind here that this has long been the plan of the Cultural Marxists (who are the ones who developed CRT as a methodological tool) to transform the West. One of their own said;

‘We will make the west so corrupt that it stinks’.

Willie Munzenberg

CRT is one tool in the Cultural Marxist playbook to the end of “fundamentally transforming” America and the West.

So, CRT is interested in power. As such CRT can be further defined as an activist movement based upon biased study of what it calls “systemic racism” and how that putative systemic racism defines power and creates oppression in social orders.

This leads to the observation that like all Totalitarians CR Theorists are interested in ordering the world according to the vision contained in their theory. Because of this CRT calls everything they want to control “racist” until it is finally under their control.

And here you need to understand that everyone of you here is “racist” just be virtue of being white and there is nothing you can do to shed that reality. So, that fact is another reason why you should be interested in this subject matter. It is the interest of CRT to, as the Scripture teaches to make it so,

Dt. 28:43 “The alien who is among you shall rise higher and higher above you, and you shall come down lower and lower. 44 He shall lend to you, but you shall not lend to him; he shall be the head, and you shall be the tail.

The fact that CRT is interested in doing this — in transforming the world — is seen by their usage of cancel culture, the way they treat minorities who disagree with their agenda (they now refer to them as “adjacent white”) and the rise of fake news. CRT is all about seizing power to implement their agenda.

So, CRT seeks not only to understand power but to rearrange circumstances and society so that they (the pervert, the feminist, the Academic, the aggrieved minority) are the head and white Christians — regardless or not whether white Christians are white or not — are hewers of wood and drawers of water, or failing that just dead.

Now we explore the reality that Critical Race theory or “Race-Marxism” is anchored in a Marxist worldview.

Classical Marxism, or what CRT refers to as “vulgar Marxism” likewise posited a “oppressor – oppressed” conflict theory pushed as a method whereby a revolution could be brought in whereby the oppressed working class would overthrow the oppressor bourgeoisie capitalist class thus resulting in the arrival of Utopia. In Cultural Marxism the pivotal revolutionary point is no longer economic as between classes, but rather in Cultural Marxism the pivotal revolutionary point is now primarily race with perversion, feminism and Academia as co-laborers.

In classical Marxism the working class (proletariat) rises up to enter into revolution against the Moneyed class (bourgeoise) and sets the world aright by bringing in a New World Order of absolute equality among comrades. However, in Cultural Marxism using CRT the new proletariat is not comprised primarily of workers but of minorities first, followed by perverts, feminists, and Academics. The shift then between these two Marxisms is away from Economic Marxism to Cultural Marxism or Race-Marxism if you prefer. CRT takes the position that race should be understood as “the central construct for understanding inequality.” (Ladson Billings & Tate)

You have to understand, that whereas in Classical Marxism property was the chief sin in Cultural Marxism/Race Marxism whiteness is the chief sin and white people and white adjacent people are seen as owning the property of whiteness that they must be stripped of just as in cultural Marxism the property class needed to be stripped of their property. However, in both cases there is a push for equality/equity.

Of course in Biblical Christianity we see;

1.) Conflict of interest theory, the tool of CRT — being the leverage used by the Serpent in the garden where the Serpent convinces Eve that God the oppressor is oppressing Adam & Eve — the oppressed.

2.) Revolution is always the tool of Satan to overthrow God’s order (Babel). Christians should not talk about Revolution but rather use words like Reformation or Counter-Revolution.

So, to summarize, CRT is a Marxist theory, using conflict theory that categorizes all men by oppressor vs. oppressed to the end of bringing in a anti-Christ revolution using the organized muscle of minorities, feminists, perverts, and Academia as the new Marxist proletariat to throw off the white Christian heteronormativity that is a property of all white people as well as non-white people who refuse to embrace the Race-Marxist world and life view having as its ultimate goal to roll Jesus Christ off His throne so as to live in a world where Satan is Lord.

Because of this shift in Marxisms we know have undergone a shift from Leftist politics that centered on the economic concerns of the working class to the politics of identity.

This shift was needed because in the West the power of the classical Marist narrative where the money class as oppressor were oppressing the working class had dissipated in the face of the ever increasing prosperity in the West. It was hard to convince the working class to pull down their own house by pulling down the evil bourgeoise.

The truth of this is found in one of the central Cultural Marxists, Herbert Marcuse. Marcuse, like so many of the founders of Cultural Marxism was a Jew. Marcuse in two of his better known works (One Dimensional Man, and An Essay on Liberation) effectively complained that advanced capitalism had been too successful at producing a prosperous flourishing society and a healthy middle class, with the result that the working class had lost its Revolutionary spirit. Marcuse then asked where to find a new Revolutionary spirit and the answer he pushes is “in the ghetto populations,” notably the black liberation movement. We see then that the radicalization of minorities and students via capturing the Universities was a major plank in reorganizing Marxism in a racial direction finally giving birth to what we today call “identity politics.”

So, Marxism had to evolve and it evolved to latch on to race as the leverage point of oppressor vs. oppressed.

This tactic in the states goes way back but exploded in the 1960s with organizations like the Black Panthers and personalities like Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, and before them W. E. B. Dubois. The Marxists used minorities in America via the vehicle of the civil Rights movement to begin to implement their race-Marxism. However, it was only in the 1990’s when CRT begin to really flex its muscle.

Continuing with this session wherein we define and describe CRT we note that CRT, in light of all that we have so far said, is like colored lenses through which the whole world is examined with the purpose of finding “hidden” racism in what was heretofore considered “color-blind” law so as to create more and more people who understand how oppressed they are thus increasing the institutional and cultural power of CRT. The Gospel of CRT is to herald how oppressed people are so as to awaken them to how their oppressors must be overthrown.

Successful CRT then works to teach people to everywhere see racism on the part of white people. In the CRT religion white people and white adjacents (previously referred to in the past as Uncle Toms) are Lucifer and the CRT Gospel sets minorities, perverts, feminists, and Academics free from the shackles of the devil white people. In CRT the end goal is Utopia a bastardization of the Christian concept of Heaven. CRT is a religion competing with Christianity.

Because CRT is another Gospel it gets into everything from education to politics to art to family life.

Here is an example of CRT getting into family life;

“What we find is that, when contextualized amongst our other modern ethical norms, this preference for our children to biologically belong to us can feel downright ancient—a vestigial remnant of a different epoch, a fossil no longer animated by the same moral intuitions that gave it gravity in the past. In fact, many of the arguments that might be made in favor of this prejudice run precisely counter to other changing attitudes toward parenting, family, and the role of biology in culture.”

It’s a shocking line of thought, but one that has gained a fair amount of mainstream palatability as our outlook on the future devolves.

Another example of how Cultural Marxism gets into family life;

A trifecta of powerful globalist organizations is rigorously executing a plan to teach kindergarteners about sexuality and “empower” children to say yes to sexual encounters, according to agency documents reviewed by The Epoch Times.

Critics say this amounts to children being “groomed” for sex under the banner of human rights and education, while pedophilia is promoted and parental rights are undermined. Experts told The Epoch Times that the push for these programs to be accepted in nations around the world could lead to the practice of having sex with “consenting” children being viewed as acceptable.

Proponents of the programs say they seek to ensure that children’s “rights” to sexual pleasure are protected.

The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the United Nations are advancing children’s exposure to sexuality on two fronts, according to documents.

Examples of CRT in our judicial/legal realm

1.) Appointing Justices because of their race. SCOTUS Justice Jumanji Jackson Brown inability to define a woman.

2.) The prosecution of Kyle Rittenhouse

3.) The Canonization of George Floyd

Remember, CRT is committed to the queering (turning upside down and inside out) of all previous Christian and so “white” social order characteristics. Remember also in two of the illustrations above the perverts are part of the new proletariat that is marching through the Institutions.

This is all an expression of our new religion of Cultural Marxism with its methodological tool of CRT.

And the sad thing is that it is not being completely and thoroughly resisted by the Reformed-Evangelical church. In point of fact it is being supported in some of its expressions as seen in this recent comment left on Iron Ink by someone attending a “conservative” “Reformed” “Church” in this area;

“They (some Elders) see themselves as having a bridge to others (CRT tpyes), and see me as someone who will drive pro-CRT people away, and cause division.

It’s why they never did fight CRT, but seek to see the workable components of it. Maybe it’s a pride they are blind to, this faith that they can see a higher and more peaceable way.

I don’t know why they don’t see as we do, there is no compromise with a Marxist.”

Now having said all this we should add that Critical Race Theorists don’t like being constrained by a definition. They themselves avoid definitions because in the avoiding of definition they can shape shift into anything else they might want to be.

CRT proponents will insist that only advocates of CRT can truly understand CRT. If you’re not CRT you can’t critique it because you don’t really understand it.

Another thing we need to understand about CRT is its conviction that racism in the West is systemic. By this they mean that even if there were no white people who were themselves individually racist the social order itself is still racist. This is because, per CRT, the whole social order was set up by those who owned the property of whiteness and therefore the whole social order itself, quite apart from any consideration of current white people, remains “racist.” The only thing that can be done to ameliorate this reality is to tear it down and start all over again. This was the conclusion of Max Horkheimer, another Jew Cultural Marxist, who believed that it is not possible to create substantive change to a system from within the system. The only way substantive change can be done is by a Revolution that tears the whole old system down.

This explains again who CRT must have Revolution. CRT cannot be considered as successful without a Leninist-Maoist type Revolution. The tail must become the head and the head must become the tail.

So CRT is committed to ending the racism that benefits white people as the fundamental organizing principle of Western society. You people sitting here tonight are the prime targets of CRT and its Mother Cultural Marxism.

And frankly it is either destroy or be destroyed. This battle is for keeps and it can genuinely be reduced to the Kingdom of Satan seeking to tear down the Kingdom of God and His Christ.


Memorial Day Poem — 2013

The Parade is on the cusp, a thankful nation shows its care
The Vets are now arriving, our heroes in wheelchairs
They were the men who fought in the Wars “over there”
Now basking in adulation for defeating the foreign threat
Lift a glass and have a toast to the 20th century vet

They delivered all mankind from the evil foreign Hun
Today Stockholm burns, London bleeds, and Paris is undone
New World Order, then created, by bayonet in Battles like Verdun
Now safe for Hajib, Mosque, and Minaret to reside in the West
And safe for Bankster tribal interests to swallow up the rest

Safe for the elimination of borders in favor of a New World State
Safe for the rise of the mud-men the Money power will create
To serve as slaves on the grounds of the New World Order estate
So salute the Dough-boys, and G.I. Joes, they kept the world Free
So that the their grand daughters could be property of savages from Fiji

Raise a cheer, and throw ticker-tape on this grand Memorial Day
Boys of Normandy swarmed the beaches, so their grandsons could be Gay
They fought the Bulge, and Coral Ridge so we could turn Christ away
In favor of a mélange hybrid faith for the living damned
And suitable for turning all the West into one Global London-istan

Remembering this Date in 1964

60 years ago today a man who received both his Masters and Ph.D. by massively plagiarizing, who was a serial adulterer, and whose chief lieutenants were known Communists gave his “I Have a Dream” Speech in Washington DC. (Yes, that speech was plagiarized as well. As was his famous “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.”)

A few months later on January 6, 1964, Martin Luther King Jr. (real name — Michael King) had experienced a long day. He spent the morning seated in the reserved section of the Supreme Court, listening as lawyers argued New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, a landmark case rising out of King’s crusade against segregation in Alabama. The minister was something of an honored guest: Justice Arthur Goldberg quietly sent down a copy of Kings account of the Montgomery bus boycott, “Stride Toward Freedom,” asking for an autograph. That night King retired to his room at the Willard Hotel. There FBI bugs reportedly picked up 14 hours of party chatter, the clinking of glasses and the sounds of illicit sex–including King’s cries of “I’m f–ing for God” and “I’m not a negro tonight!”

Martin Luther King was having sex with three White women, one of whom he brutally beat while screaming the above mentioned quotes. Much of the public information on King’s use of church money to hire prostitutes and his beating them came from King’s close personal friend, Rev. Ralph Abernathy, in his 1989 book, “And the walls came tumbling down.”

Judging King on the content of his character we can only conclude that he was a beast.

But y’all go ahead and celebrate him and his pukey speech.