Christian Nationalism For Dummies

A friend of mine sent the below as an attempt to make more understandable my previous post on Christian Nationalism. He felt that sometimes I can suffer from prolixity and grandiloquence and so lack clarity for the average reader.  This is my friends attempt to make what I wrote on Christian nationalism accessible for the average reader.

Christianity vs Marxism; The Preservation of People Groups and Nations aka Christian Nationalism

Christian Nationalism is the preservation of familial, tribal, and national distinctions as authored by God. This is in direct opposition to Marxism whose tenants seek to destroy family, tribes, and national distinctions; to blur all distinctions in favor of “equity” vis a vis the leveling of all of society.

A Christian nationalist respects and seeks to preserve all tribes and tongues, including his own, for the greater cause of God’s glory and the sharing of the gospel, the salvation of God’s people. A Marxist seeks to erase and destroy all distinctions and ties from the center out, ie from the family to the extended family, to the broader kinsmen, and finally to the nation. Marxism does this for what they call the “greater good” but when one delves into the “greater good” one finds only equity (ie leveling) of the masses who become slaves to the elite; therefore the glory and power of a few rule the leveled masses.

Just as conservationists seek to preserve a creature in danger of extinction, so the Christian nationalist seeks to preserve the distinctions of nations and people groups, especially those in danger of being smudged out by the Marxist agenda. It is the Christian’s high respect for the order of God’s creation that drives this. The Christian Nationalist doesn’t seek to only preserve his own people group but seeks also the betterment and preservation of all people groups. To call a Christian Nationalist a person of hate is to turn upside down the differences between Christianity and Marxism because, in reality, it is Marxism that hates distinctions of people groups and nations. Marxism hates this so much, it seeks their destruction.

The question then becomes, who can be a Christian nationalist? The answer is simple; all Christians and their people groups. Now, we get down to the tense nitty-gritty. Yes, a Christian Caucasian can be and should be a Christian Nationalist. Yes, a Hispanic Christian can be and should be a Christian nationalist. Yes, a Christian with high amounts of melanin in his skin, ie a person whose skin color is commonly understood as black, can be and should be a Christian nationalist.

So what if these people groups are all in a single created nation, such as the United States of America? What then? Do they each seek to preserve their own people group? The simple answer is yes but must be qualified. What has to be understood in this context is the Biblical understanding of “stranger”. In the old testament, the Israelites were commanded to be kind to the strangers among them, for they had been strangers in the land of Egypt. Many Christian leaders, informed by Marxism, point to that and say we should welcome all strangers (aliens, immigrants, illegal immigrants, and so on) into our nation without reserve. But the biblical understanding was that these “strangers” were to honor the law and order of Isreal and respect their host nation. So they (the stranger) were to be treated well, but they were also to subscribe to the laws of the land hosting them. Surely they could preserve their lines of descent of their own people groups, just as the Israelites did in the land of Egypt. But they were to abide by and under the laws of Israel, just as the Israelites lived under the rule of Egypt. So we see then that people groups within nations may preserve their distinctions….nay they should preserve their distinctions according to biblical order….while at the same time abiding under and accepting the laws of the land they live in. It also must be said that the call to preserve distinctions is not a call to remain separate and aloof. Men can be friends without sinking their racial and ethnic distinctions into a bland miasma. At least that is what Muhammed Ali thought.

Marxists would have us believe that to preserve our own people group is selfish, and hateful to another people group. That is laughable, how can one, who is in death throes, help another? He must first help himself in order to reach out to another. For example, when flying in an airplane, the instructions given, should an emergency arise and oxygen be needed, to FIRST put the oxygen on yourself and then help your children or people in the seat next to you. That only makes sense. So why, in the atmosphere we currently live in, are we denigrated for seeking to preserve our own kinsmen (of course, while showing respect and honor to kinsmen outside of our people group)? Why is this wrong? Well honestly, if one looks at what Marxism is really doing, who Marxism is really currently attacking, and who Marxism is seeking to destroy, it is predominantly the white Biblical Christian as well as Biblical Christians of other people groups. As such currently it is the white Christian when they seek to preserve their people group, who is described as a hater simply because he is seeking to survive and preserve his people. Would a white Christian advocate for the preservation of another people group who was being destroyed? By all means! In the Marxist eye, preserving people groups is wrong because it does not fit their agenda of blurring distinctions, promoting equity (a leveling of society), and abolishing Christianity because it (Christianity) is in direct opposition to the Marxist agenda, and to the Marxist religion. If we seek to acclimate to the Marxist agenda, we destroy ourselves. Do not think that eventually, the leveling won’t attack other people groups who are being used as bully pulpits to further the Marxist agenda. Likewise, if the Marxists seek to coexist with the Christian religion, one or the other will succumb. A house divided against itself cannot stand. You are not a hater if you are a white Christian seeking the survival of other white Christians and therefore (remember the oxygen mask) by extension other Christian people groups of color. You are not a hater if you are a black Christian seeking the survival of other black Christians and therefore by extension other Christian people groups. You are not a hater if you are a Hispanic Christian, seeking the survival of other Hispanic Christians and by extension other Christian people groups. We cannot seek only for our own preservation as Christians, but we must seek for the preservation of our own first whether it be black, white, yellow, French, Italian, English, Spanish, Mexican, Asian, etc. Each Christian people group has a duty before God to honorably seek to preserve their people within their nation. In the end, we are all seeking to preserve biblical Christianity by beginning at home.

McAtee Has a Few Question for Klaus Schwab Concerning the Great Reset

“We can’t continue with an economic system driven by selfish values, such as short-term profit maximization, the avoidance of tax and regulation, or the externalizing of environmental harm. Instead, we need a society, economy, and international community that is designed to care for all people and the entire planet.”
 
Klaus Schwab
Describing “Stakeholder Capitalism”
That Great Reset Economic plan which replaces Shareholder Capitalism
 
1.) “Selfish values” by whose standards? Why isn’t Schwab’s value against what he styles “selfish values,” just a selfish value on Schwab’s part, and if it is why is Schwab’s selfish value to get rid of putative selfish values a value that must be forced on all of us?
 
2.) Note that the “selfish values” that must be eliminated are the values of a countless number of individuals in favor of the selfish values of Schwab and his World Economic Forum.
 
3.) If in shareholder capitalism we are acting to avoid Government tax and regulation in our spending habits why would we want to embrace a different governmental system that will give us stakeholder capitalism that promises we won’t have to act to avoid Government tax and regulation because, per its own promise, we won’t own anything? Why should I avoid one Government arrangement that picks my pocket for another Government arrangement that steals my pants?
 
4.) Whose standard will be used to adjudicate what it means to care for all the people and the entire planet? Will I be consulted so that my standards are the standards used to adjudicate what it means to care for all 7 billion people on the entire planet or will it be the case, as I suspect, that it will be the standards of some sulfur soaked demonic whore like Schwab who will provide his Marxist standards as those standards which are used to adjudicated what it means to care for the whole planet?

Rev. Brian Lee Getting Out of His Lane

America’s original sin is rebellion. No matter how justified you might believe the American Revolution was, it ultimately comes down to the claim that the authority of the King was unjust, and therefore no longer worthy of submission.

Rev. Brian Lee
United Reformed Church Minister
Historically Challenged

The only thing this quote tells me is that Rev. Lee has never studied American History. The Colonists did not rebel against the Crown but rather drew a line in the sand regarding the Crown’s violating their Charters (Political Covenants) with the Crown. If anyone was rebelling in the run-up to the American war for Independence it was the English Crown.  The worst that can be said about the Colonialists is that they were rebelling against the English Crown’s rebellion.

The English Crown was rebelling against the Political Covenants that spelled out the responsibilities and privileges of both sides entering into political covenant via the Colonial charters. This is why, in the Declaration of Independence, the list of grievances is present. The Colonialists were saying to the Crown, “You have rebelled against our Political Covenants and because of your rebellion and breaking of the covenants we no longer, as before God, are required to keep our commitments to our responsibilities as articulated in the original covenant documents.”

 

Of course,  Rev. Brian Lee doesn’t know this, and just like all the historically illiterate he sees America’s original sin as being rebellion and goes on to warn against our rebelling against the Masked, and social distanced mandates and pleads with Christians everywhere to kiss the arse of all wicked magistrates as they require us to break the 6th and 9th commandment, (and often the 8th) be wearing face diapers. Lee has more respect for the word of Magistrates than he does the word of God.

It is interesting that Lee would do this, since as an R2K lover, he is of a crowd who is forever saying that, “Ministers need to stay in their lanes.” This means that Ministers, per the R2K crowd, shouldn’t talk about history (among other things) since that is not their lane. But here is Brian Lee doing just that — recklessly careening into the lane of Historians and writing about something he doesn’t know Jack Squat about.

Lee may intend well (who doesn’t?) but his theology at this point is anti-Christ.

You Will Have To Fight For Your Old Normal

Imagine all that Stalin, Hitler, and Mao did to make their social orders command and control social orders. Now realize that what you are currently living through in the Great Reset is more of a move towards social order control than the three of them combined could have ever dreamt of in their wildest dreams. What we are living through RIGHT NOW makes Orwell (1984, Animal Farm), Huxley (Brave New World), Bradbury, (Farenheit 451), Vonnegut (Harrison Berergon), and every other dystopian view of the future look like child’s play.

We are living, through the attempt to regulate via a command and control system, the standardization of the whole freaking world — including human beings. Via the mRNA treatment (erringly called vaccines) human beings are set to be standardized by a biological operating system being downloaded and encoded in their DNA. This standardization of human beings is much the same type of thing when the record industry standardized itself by agreeing that all LP’s would run at 45 rpm. What you are living through right now intends to turn each and every one of you into universal cogs that can be changed out to serve the same purpose.

What we are living through right now is man’s assault on God part gazillion. This is fallen man’s attempt to ascend to the most high. This is fallen man’s final storming of heaven. Man will, via the high command of the Elites, be his own god, and humans, by the design of elites will use other humans as just another planetary resource like copper, or oil, or natural gas.

Your whole future as a free man and woman depends upon you resisting the State and its every command — from face diapers to social distancing, to gathering restrictions, to a refusal to be treated with the mRNA operating system download, to business openings to whatever the State brings down. You must resist. If you don’t resist your future will be one of the hewers of wood and drawers of water.

There is no returning to normal unless you refuse this “new normal” This new normal is completely contrived and unnecessary. This new normal is committed to a universal income, social credit personal control, and surveillance existence. As the Great Reset meme goes, “You will own nothing and be happy.”

2018 James White & Anabaptist Reasoning As Fighting Against Cultural Marxism

“Concepts of “whiteness” or “blackness” are DESTROYED by the radical equality of every sinner’s need and Christ’s perfect provision. Our identity is NOT determined by our ancestors—we have been transferred out of the kingdom where such relationships rule and divide.”

Dr. James White 
Twitter feed –05 May  2018

Now it is entirely possible that Dr. White has changed his views since 2018 on this subject. One can always hope but as this quote stands it is difficult to understand how White’s position is an improvement upon Duke Kwon’s view which White is seeking to overturn.

The Reformed position has always been that grace restores nature but here White is telling us that grace destroys nature. Once someone is converted they may well be no longer left-handed…. they will not need to deal with familial traits like anger. It seems once coming to Jesus, God makes us a blank slate for Jesus to write on.

While no one would disagree that our identity (either unconverted or converted) is not absolutely determined by our ancestors. No one would disagree that once being in Christ our identity is altered. Our affections are changed incrementally. Our evaluating situations are incrementally changed. Our thinking is changed incrementally. However, one does disagree that after conversion we become a human being unrelated to the human being we were before conversion.

To see how utterly foolish White’s quote is, consider what it looks like when we just alter it slightly with an alteration perfectly legitimate;

“Concepts of ‘maleness’ or ‘femaleness’ are DESTROYED by the radical equality of every sinner’s need and Christ’s perfect provision. Our identity is NOT determined by our sexuality —we have been transferred out of the kingdom where gender identity rules and divides.”

If this ideology were followed before this generation, there would only be one race today: meaning it is new theology.  Christians have had two thousand years to eradicate all the race distinctions: how are we just getting around to it? This is Anabaptistism redux. This is James White type logic.

But we are not done.

“We cannot look back upon ethnic histories when speaking of our relationship within the one body of Christ.”

James White
Anabaptist Extraordinaire

Why could we not equally say,

“We cannot look back upon family histories when speaking of our relationship within the one body of Christ.”

If we said that it would be Taps for covenant theology. Methinks White is being consistent here with his anabaptist presuppositions.

Or what about saying,

“We cannot look back upon our gender histories when speaking of our relationship within the one body of Christ.”

There is more from Dr. Gnostic

“The renewal that is the reality of true Christians is one that obliterates social, ethnic, and historical connections.”

So… when I am saved, per White, my relationship with my Mother and Father are obliterated.

How can this man not realize the Gnostic tarbaby which he as embraced?

We end with this one from Dr. White,

“We who are opposing this very American, very sociological, but (we believe) very unbiblical movement (Cultural Marxism) do so because we see it requiring a new paradigm, a new way of interpreting the entire gospel message.”

James White

Honestly, if White is the Dudley Do-right coming to the rescue of the fair damsel in distress that fair damsel is hosed no matter if the evil Snidely Whiplash (Duke Kwon) keeps her in his possession or whether Dudley Do-right “saves the day.”

There are very few good guys in the Reformed church today.