Over here;
Vox Day answers a letter defending Rev. Doug Wilson. It is a magnificent response. Still, despite that I can’t help but wanting to have my own go at this letter defending the Pope of Moscow.
Doug’s Defender (DD) writes to Vox Day,
Firstly, I acknowledge your critiques of Doug, and recognise that he has some enormous Boomer tendencies.
McAtee responds,
Is this like acknowledging that FDR was a cripple? I mean, Captain Obvious much?
DD writes,
But.
He has a growing appeal to disaffected young evangelical men (of whom I belonged).
McAtee responds,
Nobody can disagree with that sentence above. However, Doug should be to disaffected young evangelical men what marijuana was to druggies in the day, and that is only a gateway drug to the real narcotics. Doug is the wine cooler that opens the way someday to Tennessee Sipping Whiskey. If one doesn’t move beyond Doug, one remains stunted in their Christianity.
DD writes,
He spearheaded an enormous push towards Classical Christian schooling, founded on Western Civilisation (including the Greco-Roman underpinnings).
McAtee Responds,
Not to be too technical, but you do realize, don’t you, that the Greco-Romans were pagans? Classical Education has some real merit but unless it is reinterpreted through a Biblical Grid all it produces is pagans who now how to argue. I’ve seen my share of graduates from the Moscow Greystoke Manor who embody my observation.
DD writes,
It’s a huge movement, that is reintroducing the youth to the Good, Beautiful, and True.
McAtee responds,
If that is true, than certainly enough, these youths will see that Wilson and the CREC is still not that for which they are looking. If these youths are getting a taste of the good, the true, and the beautiful than soon enough they will push on from the holding tank that is not quite the good, the true, and the beautiful that is the CREC.
Imagine if you will a large room of painting canvases all set next to one another. The very first painting canvas is covered with a very watery red. The very last painting canvas is covered with a bold fire-engine red. All the canvases between the first one and the last one are canvases that each are a little more red then the previous one but a little less red then the next one in the series. Pope Doug and the CREC represents the entry level red canvas. It has introduced you to the idea of “red.” However, if you are really captivated by Red you will push on from the entry level red and eventually you’ll look back at the entry level red and see that it really isn’t that red at all.
DD writes,
They have cleaned up church liturgy, and recaptured theological maximalism, with many offshoot ministries pushing phrases like ‘Rebuilding the New Christendom.’
McAtee responds,
Cleaned up church liturgy and taken us back, in many cases, to a liturgy that goes back to smells and bells. Further, your CREC has taken up the cursed cause of Ecclesiocentrism and the fact that you may not even know what that word means, means that you have miles to go before you sleep.
And in terms of Wilson’s vision of “Rebuilding the New Christendom,” let me just say that if Wilson is successful in doing so, then I’ll be praying that the New, New Christendom will soon come to replace Wilson’s version because Wilson’s “New Christendom,” looks an awful lot like the old Liberalism of 1950. Tell me, please, how is Wilson going to build a New Christendom while holding on to the idea of “principled pluralism?”
DD writes,
This is all important foundational work to waking up Christians. It has led to me creating a homeschool co-op teaching the Classical method, and we are exposing our children to the glorious things that the Christian West has to offer.
McAtee responds,
And now someone has to come along and shore up the cracks on Wilson’s foundational work. I promise you there is something much larger than a pea under all those mattresses.
If you want your children exposed to the glorious things of the Christian West make sure you teach them about Lepanto, the Crusades, Jon Sobieski, Jan Valjean, etc.
DD writes,
Ministries like G3 ministries are on the warpath against ‘kinism’ which has significant sway over the Reformed Conservative movements.
McAtee Responds,
Have you been sleeping? Wilson’s warpath against Kinism makes the G3 look like a bunch of boy playing cowboys and injuns.
DD writes,
Guys like Doug want more mainstream appeal, so they have opted to go soft on the racial issue. They have ousted guys like Thomas Achord, which shows they mean business.
McAtee responds,
It’s clear to everybody who has eyes that Pope Doug is going for the neo-con/New York Times crowd.
And you think “outing guys like Thomas Achord” is a recommendation for Wilson and his peeps? This is like saying that Sherman should get a medal for raping and pillaging his way to Atlanta.
DD writes,
But it is worth noting that there are more guys like Thomas Achord in these organisations who will eventually start speaking out. The time doesn’t seem to have come for that yet.
McAtee responds,
And Pope Doug is the one we are all supposed to be waiting on to give the signal when the time has come for all that? Trust me… the time will never come because Doug is merely a gatekeeper interested in pushing his brand.
DD writes,
I’m sure you’re aware that racism is perhaps one of the most unforgivable sins in the Evangelical church and will get a robust and powerful reaction from the Evangelical base (especially the Boomers). He is pushing young men in the right direction, and Christian Nationalism, as promoted by Stephen Wolfe, is gaining significant traction.
McAtee responds by quoting Vox Day,
“Stephen Wolfe’s Christian Nationalism is fake nationalism. It’s a religious form of civic nationalism that substitutes Christianity for US citizenship. He’s just another gatekeeper.”
“Not to be too technical, but you do realize, don’t you, that the Greco-Romans were pagans?”
One of the most relevant things that traditional Christians could do to prevent angry young Alt Right men from seeking refuge in paganism would be by pointing out the PAGAN elements or ingredients of Liberalism and Leftism. All too many Rightist Christians just sort of passively accept slanders like “Christianity is the grandmother of Bolshevism,” and do not counter-attack and prove the heathen character of shitlib cultural rot.
To take just one big, obvious example: the nature of modern “Last Man,” the repulsive unheroic waste product of civilization, who lacks any higher ideals beyond material comfort, that Nietzsche brutally satirized:
http://4umi.com/nietzsche/zarathustra/0
… is not really due to Christianity. True Christian is always capable of heroism. But one obvious pagan source for “Last Man” is Epicureanism, that infamous gospel of material comfort from antiquity, that the Enlightenment thinkers revived (Thomas Jefferson outright called himself an Epicurean).
Alt-Right young men should be made to understand that by no means does ALL paganism stand for defiant, warlike heroic attitude: instead of Wotan, most post-Christian people will follow Epicurus instead, and seek pleasurable oblivion instead of trying to fight impossible odds (as they might well seem to soft worldlings).
The Thomist intellectual Benjamin Wiker has in his books documented the “Epicurean” character of Liberalism in detail, like in this work for example:
https://books.google.fi/books/about/Moral_Darwinism.html?id=n27AG9eyq3gC&redir_esc=y
Wiker also explained how the spirit of Epicurus can easily infiltrate churches, as carnal-minded people learn how to mouth some gospel phrases to promote their agenda:
https://www.newoxfordreview.org/documents/the-christian-the-epicurean/
“But the lines of demarcation are blurred by those numerous nominal Christians who are really Epicureans in the Lamb’s clothing. Liberal Christians use the language of love and compassion to advance the sexual license of the Epicurean. Or they use Christ’s words against judging others to advance the cause of abortion. Or they draw from Christ’s suffering the Epicurean lesson that suffering is not redemptive but simply evil, and is to, be avoided by suicide and euthanasia. Furthermore, by making God so merciful that we needn’t fear His justice, and by consigning Hell to the realm of myth, they duplicate the effect of Epicurus’s position. These are the Liberal Christians, and though the Christian and the Epicurean inhabit different universes, they may be sitting side by side Sunday morning in the same pew.”
Or as this Greek Orthodox fellow put it:
https://www.ellopos.net/politics/kalomoiros-papacy.asp?pg=2
“It would be naiveté, therefore, if one were to believe that the pacifist disposition that characterizes humanity today proceeds from love. These words about love are hypocrisy and self-deception. This desire for peace proceeds from loss of ideals, from fear, and from love of comfort. It is the desire to be left in peace to enjoy the good things of this earth. It is the conventional co-operation for acquisition of goods which each person separately would not be able to acquire. It is a universal understanding upon something which has become the passion of the whole earth: sensualism and materialism. It is a product of necessity.”